If you mean Jesus or Yahshua by the phrase "Christ was "perfected", then I'd have to say you have a foreign understanding of scripture. Jesus was, is, and always will be perfect. He wasn't imperfect in eternity before He was born to a body of flesh, nor was He imperfect in the form of a servant, being without sin, and He certainly didn't become less than perfect in His resurrection. Since there is no time when He was imperfect there is no time for Him to be perfected. Sometimes in scripture the word perfect is used where the word complete would be more appropriate. While living in a fleshly body, Jesus could've been called incomplete as He was dispossessed of His glory and sought its restoration (as in His request to the Father in His "priestly prayer" in John's gospel.) I've heard this kind of doctrine from a cult member hawking books in the PA bus terminal years ago. What are you selling?
"Complete" is good. But I am selling nothing.
However, you have obviously missed the point: If there were no imperfection, then Christ would have had no reason to come; and if we were not to be His body and His bride, then we would have no reason to become perfect as our Father in heaven is perfect; and if were are not to be One with Him, haven fallen into imperfection and captivity, then we would not need a Savior and have no part with Him.
So, then, it is not Christ as the Head and Husband who needed to be perfected, but His body and His bride...which inseparable, in Him, were lost. History, therefore, is His story and revelation, and ours.
I am not sure just what you refer to, but if you are saying that perfection were not needed by Jesus, then you are deceived, for He said" "
My strength is made perfect in weakness."