See revelation was given to John not any other man by revelation, the only way to understand revelation is well by revelation, to whom God reveals.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
See revelation was given to John not any other man by revelation, the only way to understand revelation is well by revelation, to whom God reveals.
I was simply denying your claim that no man understands Revelation, which is impossible for you to know.See revelation was given to John not any other man by revelation, the only way to understand revelation is well by revelation, to whom God reveals.
No man does. If any man did, they would be able to layout God plan, do you see it written anywhere.I was simply denying your claim that no man understands Revelation, which is impossible for you to know.
Is Daniel understandable? Matthew? Mark?... Where in the Bible does it say that Revelation is impossible to understand? The word "revelation" itself means "revealing."No man does. If any man did, they would be able to layout God plan, do you see it written anywhere.
Parables, and Symbols. They cannot understand the vision, for they do not honour God in His Law. The Law and the Testimony always go together.Is Daniel understandable? Matthew? Mark?... Where in the Bible does it say that Revelation is impossible to understand? The word "revelation" itself means "revealing."
Yep exactly, every one gets a part and together if men but would the whole puzzle would be put together, but revelation come from Heaven not by reading or studyIs Daniel understandable? Matthew? Mark?... Where in the Bible does it say that Revelation is impossible to understand? The word "revelation" itself means "revealing."
I'm sorry but I can't make out your statement. Maybe a little punctuation would help.Yep exactly, every one gets a part and together if men but would the whole puzzle would be put together, but revelation come from Heaven not by reading or study
Why is it so diificult to understandI'm sorry but I can't make out your statement. Maybe a little punctuation would help.
You're just making up stuff.Why is it so diificult to understand
every one gets a part, and together, if men .....
Or was it this bit
but revelation come from Heaven not by reading or study
You're just making up stuff.
@2nd Timothy Group Indeed. I use and appreciate the KJV, but properly speaking inerrancy belongs to the originals.The original manuscripts may be inerrant, but not modern-day translations. We need to be realistic in this understanding. :)
You're just making up stuff.
If God can use an ass I am sure He can use Benny Hinn. Did you not read my post.
Nah i dont need to defend my self, what from. I just mentioned benny Hinn so what... really time and the seasons, there for you to see. Its no skin off my nose. You know when Jesus sent prophets and men into the world, even Jesus Himself, its not up to them to make people listen its up to the people to decide wheter they want to hear. As I said you are not my problem. Made a post all I did.That was my first thought when I saw the following:
But why would God who wants us to believe his message to us use a huckster that many do not trust/believe to deliver that message?
Makes no sense at all. It's as if you are defending yourself with the first thing that comes to mind whether it is true or not.
You know when Jesus sent prophets and men into the world, even Jesus Himself, its not up to them to make people listen its up to the people to decide wheter they want to hear. A
Its not a problem unless you make it a problem, I mentioned it to a friend of mine and we had a laugh, neither of is expected Him to say such a thing though im sure he will use it to his own gain. Plenty of others can see, shared a video with a friend on this forum in same topic.There you go again...sure its up to the people to believe it or not but why deliver the message by somone who will make it harder to believe something he wants people to believe?
IOW, the problem still remains regardless your comment. Not a big deal but you may want to give more consideration to some of the things you post before posting them.
Just trying to help.
@2nd Timothy Group Indeed. I use and appreciate the KJV, but properly speaking inerrancy belongs to the originals.
...with the Lord's help, presumably...What I know . . . for sure, is that I have much error about myself. I can't fix errors in modern translations, but I can fix the errors within myself. :)
...with the Lord's help, presumably...
Psalm 139 comes to mind...
![]()
Why call Satan, Jesus? Satan has no "secret agents" during the 1000 years.So, who is the person who has no right to the Harvest, Jesus?
So, who when he returns want to kill the Israelites for not wanting the man who goes away to be their king any more, and when he returns wants them all killed in front of him, Jesus?
Satan has certainly hood winked you into thinking that the parable of the Minas is not about him and the influence he will exercises through his "good and faithful servants" during the 1,000 years he is locked up in the Bottomless Pit.
Why call Satan, Jesus? Satan has no "secret agents" during the 1000 years.
Satan is allowed 42 months after the final harvest. People claim there is an antichrist leading the world up to some final battle with Christ. That is the farthest thing from the truth. Christ will be here Himself, present during the harvest, then Satan comes, then the FP, then finally an image of the FP. See, no antichrist, period. If you want to view this image as some super villain walking around terrorizing humans, that is something else.