OK, 2 of your articles are good, and present your case well. Their basic report is that the reason they were able to dial up so easily and get it done is because they have been working on this vaccine for 30 years. The pipeline article did say this though:https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/01/21/mrna-vaccines-what-happens
Both of these are by scientists...Not kitchy talking heads with memorable phrases or scare tactics.
They have real science...correlation WITH true Causation. Not correlation without causation.
They are the real McCoy...not posers.
The Lipid nanoparticles RNA/DNA formula, helps dose get through the Innate Immune System without the whole sentry system exploding into an active defense mode, and killing the dose before it can enter the cell and do it's business.
This sounds like what JHT1234 was talking about. The mRNA dose gets to the cell and a new RNA piece is introduced to the cell to counteract the virus. I would call that a manipulating the cell. You can call it what you need to.
So your article is good.
I would be hard pressed to attack an article that does not agree with you all the way. Just because it does not agree with you 100% does not make that doctor a kitchy talking head, ready to scare you to death. You sound like the democrats that want to brand any speech that does not agree with them, as terrorist misinformation. I hope you are not stooping to that level of logic? Right?
So have you read any of the articles that the other side have offered you? It looks like what they are saying is be careful, this is new stuff, first time used on massive populations, so be careful. And they are offering alternative vaccines that will come out soon that does not have the mRNA technology, but is more like old fashioned vaccines that do the job too.
So choose which one you want. Is that not a good idea?