What Do You Actually Have To Believe To Ensure Salvation?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Rach1370

New Member
Apr 17, 2010
1,801
107
0
44
Australia
Ahhh. Are you one of those who believe that to have the Holy Spirit you must have tongues?
In which case absolutely nothing I can say will convince you...and why on earth are you posting in the non-Christian forum?
Quite frankly; you're wrong. I know I can't convince you, I;m not gonna try - only the Holy Spirit can do that...and by labeling things "must", "can" and "can't", you don't sound as if you'd listen if He was prodding you with a baseball bat. I know I can't sway you, but I will answer your last post...

BritGuy said:
Jesus doesn't change, neither does the covenant he set up, that's the nature of a covenant.

Wasn't talking about the covenant, or God, who is unchanging.

BritGuy said:
The tongues of fire was a one-off to show the transfer of God's presence to people, it marked the inauguration of the New Covenant, it occurred before the Spirit was given not after.

This helps prove my point. I'm not talking of tongues, but the prevalence of miracles in those days. As you say; these were the days of Jesus, the beginning of His church, and really? The miraclous things that happened then, do you honestly see them happening today? What of Phillip:

[39] And when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord carried Philip away, and the eunuch saw him no more, and went on his way rejoicing. [40] But Philip found himself at Azotus, and as he passed through he preached the gospel to all the towns until he came to Caesarea.
(Acts 8:39-40 ESV)


Do you really see that happening today? And btw the tongue of fire was the Holy Spirit...as He once appeared as a dove, this time He appeared as fire. “Fire” in the OT often indicates the presence of God, especially in His burning holiness and purity, consuming everything that is impure.

BritGuy said:
God has shown what he wants to give, if you are persuaded that he doesn't then that's not God changing his mind, and it doesn't glorify God to acept the alternative.

I accept that God is sovereign and that what He gives to one He may not give to another...and to say He must give to all what He gave to one is madness. He gave the disciples the gift of healing as well as the gift of tongues. Do you 'expect' to receive that as well? Perhaps its a twofer..."get two miraculous powers all for the price of salvation!". Can't you see how cheap you're making Christ's sacrifice. The gift of grace should always be more than we deserve...not something we take as granted and then expect more.

BritGuy said:
"Spiritual gifts" are only mentioned in 1 Corinthians 12 & 14 and refer specifically to the meetings-use, *giving* to the church of attributes that all Christians have for private use.
Other passages show ALL Christians having and growing in all these attributes listed in 1 Corinthians 12:8-onwards: wisdom, knowledge, faith...tongues...


To some extend these other passages talk in general of what all Christians should do, but they also talk specifics too:

[10] As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God's varied grace: [11] whoever speaks, as one who speaks oracles of God; whoever serves, as one who serves by the strength that God supplies—in order that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ. To him belong glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.
(1 Peter 4:10-11 ESV)


Each one receives a gift, that which God wants them to achieve for Him, for His glory. Some receive gifts of 'speaking' - tongues, and some 'service'. And we know others exist thanks to 1 Cor.

[15] Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, [16] from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love.
(Ephesians 4:15-16 ESV)


Each different part of the body, working together, makes the body grow. This would suggest, yes, that each part of the body is not the same? If we were all arms not much would get done. With different spiritual gifts the Church moves forward for Jesus.

[6] Having gifts that differ according to the grace given to us, let us use them: if prophecy, in proportion to our faith; [7] if service, in our serving; the one who teaches, in his teaching; [8] the one who exhorts, in his exhortation; the one who contributes, in generosity; the one who leads, with zeal; the one who does acts of mercy, with cheerfulness.
(Romans 12:6-8 ESV)


Pretty straight forward, I think. You think to lump a gift like "tongues" under the other things that Christians just need to do. You're talking of 'fruit'. Sure, the fruit of the Spirit is faith, kindness, love. And all Christians should strive to grow in knowledge, wisdom and pray daily for faith. But the above verses quite clearly tell us that some people receive some gifts and others, others. We are not all the same, and since we were made different by God, we should embrace that, not make people feel inferior in faith. When it is God Himself who hands out gifts, how can you say it's not enough, it's not the right gift? Who are you really saying 'not good enough' to then??

BritGuy said:
Has God doe away with all the gifts listed, or just the ones you personally haven't experienced?

I never claimed God has done away with gifts. And I never said that just because I don't have the gift of tongues that it doesn't exist. I think here you're just getting snarky. So, lets talk tongues, Hmm?
You have a go at me about the disciples speaking tongue's at Pentecost. I was summarizing for brevity, I apologize.

You say:
The disciples were speaking to God, others recognised real language but they were not being preached to.

So as to avoid the same mistake, I'll break it down. The disciples received the Holy Spirit and started talking in tongues (The word translated “tongues” (Gk. glōssa, plural) can also be translated “languages.), and men of different nations and languages heard them:

[11] ...both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabians—we hear them telling in our own tongues the mighty works of God.” [12] And all were amazed and perplexed, saying to one another, “What does this mean?”
(Acts 2:11-12 ESV)


Mighty works of God? And if these men understood them, the disciples were obviously speaking in earthly tongues. I understand that when on speaks to God in tongues, it is in a language that no one earthly understands expect perhaps the one God has granted the gift of interpreting). Lets look at some verses from 1 Corinthians...

[4] Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; [5] and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; [6] and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone. [7] To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good.
(1 Corinthians 12:4-7 ESV)


Pretty simple...different gifts to different people...all to serve God.

[10] to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues.
(1 Corinthians 12:10 ESV)


That's interesting...various kinds of tongues.

[2] For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit.
(1 Corinthians 14:2 ESV)


No one understands him? But the men at Pentecost understood the disciples. So we see that the "different kinds" of tongues is this: for missionary purposes, that other men may understand us when we tell them of God, and as a private prayer and praise language between the speaker and God.
So really, at Pentecost, the men were being preached to, they we incredulous because they knew the disciples to be Jews, and probably peasants as well...and yet suddenly here they were being multilingual!

[7] And they were amazed and astonished, saying, “Are not all these who are speaking Galileans? [8] And how is it that we hear, each of us in his own native language?
(Acts 2:7-8 ESV)


Sure there were scoffers in the crowd...there always is! And plus, remember that the people of this city had just crucified the leader of these men, the disciples has just been in hiding! No doubt there were many (like Saul) who were still burning with anger and hate against followers of Jesus. So yes, Peter stood up and spoke to them, explained to them, preached to them.

[37] Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” ...[41] So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.
(Acts 2:37, 41 ESV)


And it doesn't actually say what language Peter spoke in...I wouldn't be suprised if there were some there that didn't speak the 'common' language, and if that were the case I have no doubt that at such an important event, they would have heard him in their native tongue. That is speculation, but the rest of it....plain biblical truth.

BritGuy said:
God told the King of Israel to ask for a sign, he wouldn't sdso as God said, God gave one anyway

Again, you forget Matthew:

[39] But he answered them, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.
(Matthew 12:39 ESV)


You are trying to do away with one scripture by using another. What this tells us is this: God gives to one what He may not to another. We are to abide with what He chooses...He is God, He is sovereign, He is good and He is beyond wise. To seek a miracle or sign for our own benefit and not His is to be labeled 'an evil and adulterous generation'. Please don't be labeled that, please accept that if God wants you to have something He will give it to you. Stop desiring tongues and just pray that God give you something that you can serve Him with. If that be tongues, that will be what you get.
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
Ahhh. Are you one of those who believe that to have the Holy Spirit you must have tongues?
In which case absolutely nothing I can say will convince you...and why on earth are you posting in the non-Christian forum?

My point is that until you have received the Spirit as the New Covenant details (the only way), you are a non-Christian (according to the bible definition- Romans 8:8-9)
In other words, you are not a part of, and cannot understand the Kingdom of God (John 3:3-8)


The miraclous things that happened then, do you honestly see them happening today?
Yes, you don't because you havn't yet received "the faith" (Jude 3, 20)


What of Phillip:
[39] And when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord carried Philip away, and the eunuch saw him no more, and went on his way rejoicing. [40] But Philip found himself at Azotus, and as he passed through he preached the gospel to all the towns until he came to Caesarea.
(Acts 8:39-40 ESV)


Do you really see that happening today?

yes, I often meet people who receive the word gladly, but sometimes I have to move on anmd don't see them again for a while.


He gave the disciples the gift of healing as well as the gift of tongues. Do you 'expect' to receive that as well? Perhaps its a twofer..."get two miraculous powers all for the price of salvation!". Can't you see how cheap you're making Christ's sacrifice. The gift of grace should always be more than we deserve...not something we take as granted and then expect more.

It's not me belittling Christ!
I'm not saying you can receive Christ and not his power and authority to heal.
I'm saying you receive full and complete salvation!.
Thropwing allt these things into question leaves people with a words-only "salvation", that is madness.


To some extend these other passages talk in general of what all Christians should do, but they also talk specifics too:
[10] As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God's varied grace: [11] whoever speaks, as one who speaks oracles of God; whoever serves, as one who serves by the strength that God supplies—in order that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ. To him belong glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.
(1 Peter 4:10-11 ESV)

That's talking about ministries in the church: preacher/teacher, servant.. people who make regular use of abilities that others have but don't use as much.

Each one receives a gift, that which God wants them to achieve for Him, for His glory. Some receive gifts of 'speaking' - tongues, and some 'service'. And we know others exist thanks to 1 Cor.
You have missed the simple distinction between the private abilities that all have and the public giving that not all do.

I never claimed God has done away with gifts. And I never said that just because I don't have the gift of tongues that it doesn't exist. I think here you're just getting snarky.
I apologise for mis-reading, you didn't suggest God has done away with tongues.

I understand that when on speaks to God in tongues, it is in a language that no one earthly understands expect perhaps the one God has granted the gift of interpreting).
We have had a couple of occasions in our meetings where non-Christians recognised a gift of tongues.
It was in a language / dialect they had learned.
One was an African, the other was a greek lady who ended up marrying the guy who gave the gift.


Lets look at some verses from 1 Corinthians...
OK, but you are now looking at a letter written to people different to you...
If you read Acts you will see that these people have already met the apostles who were preaching the same message of salvation to all, and God was honouring that in the same way to all who believed it... all received the infilling of His Spirit and knew it immediately by speaking in tongues.
These people now have Jesus inside, with all his attributes:

"I thank my God always on your behalf, for the grace of God which is given you by Jesus Christ;
That in every thing ye are enriched by him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge;
Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you:
So that ye come behind in no gift; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ:
(1:4-7)

... your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.
Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect (2:5-6)

But we have the mind of Christ. (2:16)

..."we know that we all have knowledge." (8:1)


... etc

[4] Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; [5] and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; [6] and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone. [7] To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good.
(1 Corinthians 12:4-7 ESV)


Pretty simple...different gifts to different people...all to serve God.

Yup, so, not all Christians are going to be operating all.


[10] to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues.
(1 Corinthians 12:10 ESV)


That's interesting...various kinds of tongues.

I don't know whether the group you worship with actually operates the gifts like 1 Corinthians details, but we hear 2 or 3 gifst of tongues, "diversity of tongues", as each gift sounds different.


[2] For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit.
(1 Corinthians 14:2 ESV)


No one understands him? But the men at Pentecost understood the disciples.

We see that they were all left in doubt and confusion (vv12-13), yes, they recognised the words but they did not understand the mysteries those words were describing.

It's like anyone can read the Bible in thgeir own language - do they therefore have and understand the Kingdom of God?
- No!

1 Corinthiansd 14:2 explains Acts 2:12-14.

There is not, and never was any function, or need for people to be miraculously given fluency in the languages of the nations, they already had that ability or the ability to learn.
I expect there are people in your group who have learned or who are learning other languages in which they preach to people of other nations?

Tongues was a sign to the non-Christians, but, when it came to preaching and explaining the gospel, Peter & the other apostles used labnguage they had already learned.

The 3000 Jews who joined the 120 disciples were already bi-lingual, so, they took the message back to all the known world without God having to give them a newe language to preach in.


Again, you forget Matthew:
[39] But he answered them, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.
(Matthew 12:39 ESV)

No, I explained the sign of the prophet Jonah in detail.
Jesus gave, and gives specific signs to believers, just like God did in Isaiah 7, the evil and adulterous people (like Ahab) don't accept these.

God's sovereign decision has been to make speaking in tongues the sign of receiving "the new heart", of entering the new covenant, of being "born again".
After having been presented with the scriptures, and the opportunity to come and see a church where all have this, and where the gifts are operated as 1 Corinthians details, you would be evil and adulterous if you stood back (as the pharisees did) and accepted other ways (spiritual adultery).

I say if because I know you may do as I and many others have done who used to believe as you do, because that's what ministers told us, and juct come and see.
 

brionne

Active Member
May 31, 2010
830
130
43
Australia
Pls don't use clichés like "believe in Jesus", Jesus taught that many who say they believe in him will told "I never knew you", so how can you know you are saved?

the answer is that you cannot know you are saved until you actually ARE saved.


Jesus told his disciples that they must 'endure until the end' Matthew 24:13 and if they endured until the end they would receive the gift of salvation.

Enduring meant that they needed to keep their spiritual focus. 2 Cor 4:18 Matthew 6:33
And they needed to continue doing Gods will. Matthew 7:21
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
the answer is that you cannot know you are saved until you actually ARE saved.
Jesus told his disciples that they must 'endure until the end' Matthew 24:13 and if they endured until the end they would receive the gift of salvation.
Enduring meant that they needed to keep their spiritual focus. 2 Cor 4:18 Matthew 6:33
And they needed to continue doing Gods will. Matthew 7:21
The church in the New Testament certainly knew they had received salvation:

"unto us which are saved" (1 Cor. 1:18)
"Who hath saved us" (2 Tim.1:9)
"he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost" (Titus 3:5)
etc.

How do you explain these statements?
What "salvation" is this?
 

brionne

Active Member
May 31, 2010
830
130
43
Australia
The church in the New Testament certainly knew they had received salvation:

"unto us which are saved" (1 Cor. 1:18)
"Who hath saved us" (2 Tim.1:9)
"he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost" (Titus 3:5)
etc.

How do you explain these statements?
What "salvation" is this?

im not sure which translation you are using here but if you compare it to some other translations you'll see that the salvation is an 'ongoing' process... its not an instant salvation. Notice in a few other translations it is rendered as 'being saved'

1Cor1:18 NIV, ASV, ESV,
For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

Also its noteworthy that salvation comes at a cost... we have to work for it. Jesus indicated this at Luke 13:23-24 Now a certain man said to him: “Lord, are those who are being saved few?” He said to them: “Exert yourselves vigorously to get in through the narrow door, because many, I tell YOU, will seek to get in but will not be able

And notice Pauls words at philippians 2:12-15 Consequently, my beloved ones, in the way that YOU have always obeyed, not during my presence only, but now much more readily during my absence, keep working out YOUR own salvation with fear and trembling; 13 for God is the one that, for the sake of [his] good pleasure, is acting within YOU in order for YOU both to will and to act. 14 Keep doing all things free from murmurings and arguments, 15 that YOU may come to be blameless and innocent, children of God without a blemish in among a crooked and twisted generation, among whom YOU are shining as illuminators in the world, 16 keeping a tight grip on the word of life


So to understand the salvation that your 3 scriptures are talking about, we have to balance them out with other scriptures. When we compare them to Paul and Jesus words about salvation we see that salvation is something God gives to those who 'keep' doing and acting in harmony with what they've learnt. If we shrink back and give up in the fight to do what is right, then we can loose out on salvation

but one thing is assured to us and that is that God is faithful in that he will grant salvation to those who have worked hard for it by remaining obedient.
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
im not sure which translation you are using here but if you compare it to some other translations you'll see that the salvation is an 'ongoing' process... its not an instant salvation.
I'm using the KJV because I've read reports of the unreliability of later translations.
This most important of subjects can be a test case!

I'm not a greek scholar, are you?

I would like to know whether the phrase translated "saved" is better translated "being saved".

In the meantime, do you agree that The Old Testament is given as an example?
The New Testament says so. On the subject of salvation Jude v5 says:

"I will therefore put you in remembrance ...how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not"


So, they were physically delivered from Egypt and Pharoah's army, they were free, but they had not yet taken the promised land.

I see a pareallel in the New Covenant whereby people were set free from slavery to their own sin by being given God's Spirit:
"he saved us by the... regeneration (new birth) ... Holy Spirit" (Titus 3:5)

but Christians are then expected to choose to live this new life. Those that do will rule and reign with Christ over the nations, having a new grorified body:

Romans 8:23: And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.

- But it is necessary to believe you are already in right standing with God, clothed in righteousness not sin in order to come boldly before God, claiming all his benefits.

Apart from not having the new body, in what sense is a born again person not saved?

... God is faithful in that he will grant salvation to those who have worked hard for it by remaining obedient.
and yet Jesus says "my yoke is easy", he was yoked by the Holy Spirit, He did all the work... Pegg, have you received the Holy Spirit like Acts details?
 

TexUs

New Member
Nov 18, 2010
1,197
37
0
To become a true citizen of Heaven you need to be justified in Christ through submission, confession and baptism and sanctified in Christ, converted - mind, heart and soul. Obedience is our part in the process - practicing perspective taking, empathy, love and forgiveness - which it the sanctification God is working in our hearts
I disagree with this baptism part but otherwise I agree. I'd put baptism into the second half- what was the "obedience" portion.




Anyway, OP, I haven't read every reply fully but I think I get the gist of what you're saying.
I think the answer to "depart from me I knew you not" passage you take issue with is found right there: KNEW ME NOT. The demons fear and know whom Christ is, we see this Biblically. To know he *exists* isn't enough, then.
Even though faith without works (the "obedience" part of aspen's post) is dead, and a sincere Christian does these, we see from this very same passage that doing these things can't save you, either. This means that something OTHER than works is the sole saving grace. This also does mean that works are part of living the lift of a Christian.
Imperfect Analogy time. It's like putting an engine in a vehicle. It's central to the function of that vehicle, without it, nothing else can work. However, putting oil and gasoline and maintaining that engine is part of keeping that vehicle running. There are now other things introduced ("the works") that you should do to maintain the engine ("the faith"), but none of these work apart from the engine. The engine can still run without clean oil, but it doesn't run well and very often, the engine will fail without it.

So it's not works. It's not belief OF Christ.
The answer is FOLLOWING Christ.
Read 1 John.
Just a summary of it, from Chapter 1: "If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth. But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin."
Paul tells us in Romans that faith is IN Christ as well. Part of faith in Christ is faithfulness TO Christ. What is this element of faith? Paul tells us in Romans 3:25, to believe in the work done at the Cross.


So salvation is multi-step.
1) Faith in the work done at the cross (faith)
2) Faithfullness to Christ (Or "knowing" him)
3) Walking in the light as he did (works)


Many Christians, revivals and summer camps are a prime example of this, stop at #1. They claim Christ, but there's been no life transformation or application (#2), which calls into effect weather they really did have a collision with Christ.
And some people, as Christ was talking of, walk like Christ, #3. Yet they had no faith in what Christ had done, they did not "know" Christ, #2.


Does that help you any at all? It's a rather complex thing to word out, I know what I've typed is not perfect, I just struggle with how else I can communicate my mind :)
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
So salvation is multi-step.
1) Faith in the work done at the cross (faith)
2) Faithfullness to Christ (Or "knowing" him)
3) Walking in the light as he did (works)

Many Christians, revivals and summer camps are a prime example of this, stop at #1. They claim Christ, but there's been no life transformation or application (#2), which calls into effect weather they really did have a collision with Christ.
And some people, as Christ was talking of, walk like Christ, #3. Yet they had no faith in what Christ had done, they did not "know" Christ, #2.
So when do you believe the disciples became saved in the New Testament sense?

When did anyone in the New Testament become saved?
 

TexUs

New Member
Nov 18, 2010
1,197
37
0
So when do you believe the disciples became saved in the New Testament sense?

When did anyone in the New Testament become saved?
I don't believe (while it's possible) in a "spot" or single instance in time. The Christian life is described over and over again as a journey, a path, a walk.
I think it's a process. Just hear testimonies, most life transformations by Christ happen during a season of their life, not in one spot instantly.


That said I think I'll take a stab at your question... They obviously, in most of the gospels, didn't see the work of Christ yet until he had died and risen. It's then we see Christ sending his disciples out as his representatives, it's obvious it happened by then.
Some of them may also had faith in that, "Yes, this guy IS the messiah!" ahead of time by his miracles, etc. Again, faith in the work the Messiah was going to do (OT faith), verses faith in what was done (NT faith).
Look at Doubting Thomas. He doubted the work of Christ, one could argue he wasn't a Christian until he saw and believed what had happened, so it's possible he wasn't a Christian during the actual ministry of Christ.
This is just an "interesting" topic but all that matters in the end is that they were followers of Christ.
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
I don't believe (while it's possible) in a "spot" or single instance in time. The Christian life is described over and over again as a journey, a path, a walk.
But life starts at a point, "birth". Not something that goes unnoticed!

Do you know what the born again experience is?

If you can identify when the discuiples were born again, you know when they started following Jesus the way we need to.
 

TexUs

New Member
Nov 18, 2010
1,197
37
0
But life starts at a point, "birth". Not something that goes unnoticed!
I'm sure there's a point. But most of the time it's a transformation, not an instant 180.

The fact we can't point this out in all of the disciples should re-enforce this point, don't you think?


 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
I'm sure there's a point. But most of the time it's a transformation, not an instant 180.

The fact we can't point this out in all of the disciples should re-enforce this point, don't you think?
Which disciples can't we point it out with?
If we take the bible definition of being saved by the "washing" (baptism) of the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5), then clearly they all received this at Pentecost.
Jesus had said they would know the day (John 14:20)
 

TexUs

New Member
Nov 18, 2010
1,197
37
0
Which disciples can't we point it out with?
If we take the bible definition of being saved by the "washing" (baptism) of the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5), then clearly they all received this at Pentecost.
Jesus had said they would know the day (John 14:20)
The Holy Spirit did not indwell men prior to Christ, Abraham was justified by faith in Christ, not the Holy Spirit. The HS followed Christ, read John 14. There's no reason the disciples were not the same.
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
The Holy Spirit did not indwell men prior to Christ, Abraham was justified by faith in Christ, not the Holy Spirit. The HS followed Christ, read John 14. There's no reason the disciples were not the same.
Faith is still the same, but how that translates is different.

Abraham was commanded to offer his son etc, we are not.
We are commanded to beb born again, Abraham was not.
 

TexUs

New Member
Nov 18, 2010
1,197
37
0
Faith is still the same, but how that translates is different.

Abraham was commanded to offer his son etc, we are not.
We are commanded to beb born again, Abraham was not.
So your question seems to be what covenant the disciples were under.

Let's logically think about this.
As you said, faith is the common thing here. We know prior to Christ, faith is what saved as well. We know after Christ, faith also saves, but it is coupled with the Holy Spirit. So we get an additional thing now, which Christ calls the helper... I think you'd say this marks the new covenant?


The question is when did the disciples believe IN Christ? Were they believing in the work of Christ to come (Old covenant) or did they only believe after (New covenant)? Look at Thomas. He doubted until he saw Christ... I'd say he's one solid example we have of not believing until AFTER the work done at the cross.
But we're also told he nailed the law to the cross, right? But we didn't get the Holy Spirit until after he ascended, which we know was at LEAST 40 days.
So you have this weird little gap of time, between the cross and the Holy Spirit... People that believe during this time, what covenant are they under? In my opinion it was the new (again, he nailed the law on the cross). Keep in mind Titus wrote what he wrote after the Holy Spirit came... So his statement was true when it was made (after). I don't think he excludes people being saved under the new covenant during that little window of time at all, he was making a statement at the present time in which he wrote that.

So, the disciples either were saved because of faith in what he'd do (I think Thomas is excluded from this). Or they were saved after seeing the work done on the cross and believing it (like Thomas).
The fact is we don't know enough about the disciples to really see when each one was saved. We see Peter deny Christ three times to avoid persecution, but later on go and die a martyr's death... Does this not seem like a transformed heart? So it's possible Peter didn't believe until after the Cross, either.
I'm trying to think of examples of any disciples that had faith in Him before the Cross and I'm coming up dry, you???
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
So your question seems to be what covenant the disciples were under.
Let's logically think about this.
As you said, faith is the common thing here. We know prior to Christ, faith is what saved as well. We know after Christ, faith also saves, but it is coupled with the Holy Spirit. So we get an additional thing now, which Christ calls the helper... I think you'd say this marks the new covenant?
yes

The question is when did the disciples believe IN Christ?
No, it's when did they receive his Life, his New Testament salvation.

Were they believing in the work of Christ to come (Old covenant) or did they only believe after (New covenant)? Look at Thomas. He doubted until he saw Christ... I'd say he's one solid example we have of not believing until AFTER the work done at the cross.
But we're also told he nailed the law to the cross, right? But we didn't get the Holy Spirit until after he ascended, which we know was at LEAST 40 days.
So you have this weird little gap of time, between the cross and the Holy Spirit... People that believe during this time, what covenant are they under?
The Old Covenant. The new requires receiving the Spirit.

Like in the Old Covenant, the sacrificial lamb wasn't just killed, they had to take the blood and sprinkle the altar before the glory/blessing came.
Jesus had to ascend and present his blood at the altar before the Spirit could be given (Acts 2)

2Cor. 3:3: Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.

Heb:8:10: For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
Heb:10:16: This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;


Heb:13:10: We have an altar, whereof they have no right to eat which serve the tabernacle.

In my opinion it was the new (again, he nailed the law on the cross). Keep in mind Titus wrote what he wrote after the Holy Spirit came... So his statement was true when it was made (after). I don't think he excludes people being saved under the new covenant during that little window of time at all, he was making a statement at the present time in which he wrote that.
Even if you were right (and I'm sure you are not), it's irrelevant to people alive today.

So, the disciples either were saved because of faith in what he'd do (I think Thomas is excluded from this). Or they were saved after seeing the work done on the cross and believing it (like Thomas).
The fact is we don't know enough about the disciples to really see when each one was saved. We see Peter deny Christ three times to avoid persecution, but later on go and die a martyr's death... Does this not seem like a transformed heart? So it's possible Peter didn't believe until after the Cross, either.
I'm trying to think of examples of any disciples that had faith in Him before the Cross and I'm coming up dry, you???
They all had human faith until Pentecost, then they all had "the faith once delivered" - Jude 3, accompanied by "praying in the Holy Spirit (v20)
 

TexUs

New Member
Nov 18, 2010
1,197
37
0
If you apparently know the answer then why are you asking?
No, it's when did they receive his Life, his New Testament salvation.
When they believed IN him, we've been over this.

The Old Covenant. The new requires receiving the Spirit.

Like in the Old Covenant, the sacrificial lamb wasn't just killed, they had to take the blood and sprinkle the altar before the glory/blessing came.
Jesus had to ascend and present his blood at the altar before the Spirit could be given (Acts 2)
What do you base this off of? The closest thing in Acts 2 is this, which doesn't support that.
"Exalted to the right hand of God, he has received from the Father the promised Holy Spirit and has poured out what you now see and hear."


2Cor. 3:3: Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.
Heb:8:10: For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
Heb:10:16: This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;
Heb:13:10: We have an altar, whereof they have no right to eat which serve the tabernacle.
None of these speak of salvation.


None of these would refute Thomas coming to belief before the HS but after the cross, having faith in what was done (New), not in what was to come (Old).


The word "believe" used by both Thomas and Christ, in John 20 (pisteuō) is the same exact word Paul uses when speaking of salvation in Romans 1:16 or 3:22. Coincidence?

Even if you were right (and I'm sure you are not), it's irrelevant to people alive today.
None of what we're discussing is relevant. What does it matter when the disciples were saved or when or in what order things take place in the salvation process? All that matters is it happens.

You're saying Titus was writing to a crowd in the PAST? I just have to say: lol.
He was writing to the people of his day.
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
If you apparently know the answer then why are you asking?
this is "meet Christianity" - where you and others can meet it!
I know you think you already know, but as will be shown, you don't...

When they believed IN him, we've been over this.
the question is "What do you actually have to believe..." so you are kind of confusing the point by looking at the disciples before they became born again at Pentecost.

What do you base this off of? The closest thing in Acts 2 is this, which doesn't support that.
"Exalted to the right hand of God, he has received from the Father the promised Holy Spirit and has poured out what you now see and hear."
It exactly supports it! -

If you go into the Old Testament you will find it in detail, Hebrews 9:19-24 summarises:

"For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people,
Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you.
Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry.
And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.
It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.
For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us"


Pentecost was the sprinking.

None of these speak of salvation.
100% wrong!
They all do!
Receiving "the heart of flesh" instead of the old stony heart of sin is what salvation is all about!

None of these would refute Thomas coming to belief before the HS but after the cross, having faith in what was done (New), not in what was to come (Old).
That's your own private non-scriptural interpretation you are hanging on to!

The word "believe" used by both Thomas and Christ, in John 20 (pisteuō) is the same exact word Paul uses when speaking of salvation in Romans 1:16 or 3:22. Coincidence?
No, it's the same word found throughout the bible, but most people who "believe in Jesus" will be told "I never knew you"!!!
Why? - because they didn't believe what God was saying to them. They did what you are doing and picked the bits that suited them instead.
 

TexUs

New Member
Nov 18, 2010
1,197
37
0
Tell me why I should continue this discussion if you masquerade as someone looking for answers but then attempt to lecture me? It seems you are trying to convince others of your position.
I even understand devil's advocation, I do it quite frequently, but statements such as "I know you think you already know, but as will be shown, you don't..." go beyond that.
 

BritGuy

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
48
0
0
Tell me why I should continue this discussion if you masquerade as someone looking for answers but then attempt to lecture me? It seems you are trying to convince others of your position.
I even understand devil's advocation, I do it quite frequently, but statements such as "[font="tahoma][size="2"]I know you think you already know, but as will be shown, you don't..." [/size][/font][font="tahoma][size="2"]go beyond that.[/size][/font]
Nonsense, Jesus often asked people questions, to show them where they were "at".
Some hated it, others took it as an opportunity to learn.