Ferris Bueller
Well-Known Member
Not according to Romans 2:14-16.Just think of trhe tens of billions since Pentecost who have lived and died and never heard of Jesus once- they are lost and had no chance.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not according to Romans 2:14-16.Just think of trhe tens of billions since Pentecost who have lived and died and never heard of Jesus once- they are lost and had no chance.
Which means... it is disputed.The doctrine of election is not what is in dispute. What it actually means is what is in dispute.
Well... it's 'Arminians'... Regardless where one falls on the Election "spectrum," the question really comes down to accepting the following passages (emphases mine of course), which are very much unambiguous:Calvinists say you are chosen because God predetermined that you will be a believer. Arminists say you are chosen by God because you became a believer.
Only in Calvinism . The majority of Christendom rejects Calvinism .
hope this helps !!!
Virtually every born again person was type one soil in the beginning. They heard the word and it went away as fast as it came. Everybody starts out there. I've only heard of a few exceptions of people hearing the gospel for the very first time and being saved at that first hearing of the gospel.
The doctrine of election is not what is in dispute. What it actually means is what is in dispute.
Calvinists say you are chosen because God predetermined that you will be a believer.
Arminists say you are chosen by God because you became a believer.
Every believer is conformed to the image of Jesus.
Calvinists think that means you were purposely destined by God to be a believer and be conformed to the image of Jesus.
Arminians think that means that if/when you believe you are destined to be conformed to the image of Jesus.
Even Arminians believe that.
Being chosen means you were purposely destined by God to be chosen to salvation.
Being chosen can also mean if/when a person has faith they are chosen by God for salvation based on them having received the gospel.
Yes, God knew would would receive the gospel and who would not before this world was created. That's his foreknowledge.
Predestined for what?
Predestined to believe, or predestined as in those who believe are predestined to be conformed to the image of God?
What's a fake believer then?I have given you several times over several threads that clearly and unambiguously show the Scriptures saying an unsaved individual cannot and will not choose the things of God!
What do we do with the part that says Pharaoh also hardened his heart?Did God make us all exactly as He pleased? Of course He did. Did He harden Pharaoh's heart so He could destroy Pharaoh? Of course He did.
Why can't foreknowledge be simply knowing the future? And so in the context of this discussion God is certainly not mystified as to who will believe and be saved in the future. Why does foreknowledge have to mean God makes the future and not just knows the future?That is not foreknowledge. At least according to koine greek. Foreknowledge is known what He will do in advance.
Both are true.What do we do with the part that says Pharaoh also hardened his heart?
That is an excellent question, Ferris. Please, allow me.Why can't foreknowledge be simply knowing the future? ... In the context of this discussion God is certainly not mystified as to who will believe and be saved in the future. Why does foreknowledge have to mean God makes the future and not just knows the future?
Couldn't it be his foreknowledge in regard to who he would call? Like how he knew ahead of time that he would call the nation of Israel.1. the foreknowledge that Paul is speaking of cannot be merely a cognitive knowing beforehand, because in that sense, God foreknows everybody and everything
here is what foreknew means in Romans 8:29 not what you have claimed about from Strongs/ThayersThat is an excellent question, Ferris. Please, allow me.
Let's look at what Paul says about "those whom He foreknew" in Romans 8:29...
God is the creator, right? And He knows who everybody is, and He knows what they will do at any point in their lives, right? Yes, and we would agree on all of these questions. Yes, yes, and yes. But think about what Paul says there in Romans 8:29. He says "those whom He foreknew," and in so doing, he is talking about a specific group of people, less than the whole. So implicitly, he's saying that there are at least some that God did not foreknow. So:
1. the foreknowledge that Paul is speaking of cannot be merely a cognitive knowing beforehand, because in that sense, God foreknows everybody and everything
2. if God predestines people because they are going to believe, then the ground of their salvation is in themselves and their merit, instead of in Him and His mercy, whereas Paul's whole emphasis is on God's free initiative of grace (plus it's contrary to what Paul says in Romans 9:16, that it depends not on man who wills or acts, but on God, Who has mercy.
What it does mean is this. In the Hebrew of the Old Testament and in the Greek of the New, this verb "to know" expresses much more than mere intellectual cognition; it denotes a personal relationship of care and affection. Thus, when God 'knows" people, He watches over them, cares for them, even loves them. Well, yes, He watches over, cares for, and loves everybody, but His elect He loves ~ even before the foundation of the world, remember ~ in a sovereign, distinguishing way, a special, choosing way in which he does not love others. Again, He loves others, but not in the same sovereign, distinguishing way as His elect. On a lesser level, any parent would say this about his or her own children; as a father, I love all children and all people, but I love my own children in a different ~ higher ~ way. So too with God, but on a much greater level. As Creator, this is His right; He is the potter and we are the clay. He can make some for noble use and some for common use, just as Paul says, and for just the reasons that Paul says, in Romans 9.
Grace and peace to you
Sure, but the point is that is calling ~ which is much more than just, "Hey, dude, you wanna get saved?" ...facetious but true... ~ is an proactive act of love on His part; His calling is a drawing of the sinner unto Himself, as a father would pick up his child and carry him/her to safety. This is His mercy and compassion on the person.Couldn't it be his foreknowledge in regard to who he would call? Like how he knew ahead of time that he would call the nation of Israel.
"28And we know that God works all things together for the good of those who love Him, who are called according to His purpose. 29For those God foreknew (the called), He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son" Romans 8:28-29Foreknowledge seems to be in regard to being called.
"1I ask then, did God reject His people? Certainly not! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. 2God did not reject His people, whom He foreknew." Romans 11:1-2
Right, and I agree, but Paul's context denotes much more than that. In the mere sense that God "knew ahead of time," God knows every one (and every thing) ahead of time. But Paul, by "those whom He foreknew," is saying implicitly that there are at least some that He did not foreknow, so it cannot be mere knowing ahead of time. And even beyond that, using a good English concordance, do a word search of "appoint," or "appointed," and you will see (I hope) that God doesn't merely "know ahead of time" as if He has no control over what happens and is just hoping things "turn out okay," but rather appoints these things to happen. Acts 13:48 is (or should be, anyway) very instructive here:God knew ahead of time that he would call a nation and people out of the world for Himself and that the destiny of these called out ones is they will be conformed to the image of His Son. That's the plan. The plan ordained from before the beginning of creation.
I'm not suggesting that Strong's/Thayer's is not useful, but here, it is wrong, at least in some cases, and Romans 8:29 is one. Again (as I said above), we must understand what it can also mean to know someone, as in the context of both the Hebrew and the Greek. I'm not saying "knew" or "know" can't mean mere "knowing beforehand," because, yes, there are Biblical references where this is obviously the context. But here in Romans 8:29, the context is quite different. Appropriate references can be seen here:here is what foreknew means in Romans 8:29 not what you have claimed about from Strongs/Thayers
Strong's Concordance
proginóskó: to know beforehand
Original Word: προγινώσκω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: proginóskó
Phonetic Spelling: (prog-in-oce'-ko)
Definition: to know beforehand
Usage: I know beforehand, foreknow.
4267 proginṓskō (from 4253 /pró, "before" and 1097 /ginṓskō, "to know") – properly, foreknow; used in the NT of "God pre-knowing all choices – and doing so without pre-determining (requiring) them"
προγινώσκω; 2 aorist 3 person singular προέγνω; perfect passive participle προεγνωσμενος; to have knowledge of beforehand; to foreknow: namely, ταῦτα, 2 Peter 3:17, cf. 2 Peter 3:14, 16; τινα, Acts 26:5; οὕς προέγνω, whom he (God) foreknew, namely, that they would love him, or (with reference to what follows) whom he foreknew to be fit to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, Romans 8:29
What's a fake believer then?
Why can't foreknowledge be simply knowing the future? And so in the context of this discussion God is certainly not mystified as to who will believe and be saved in the future. Why does foreknowledge have to mean God makes the future and not just knows the future?
We know that, but who made it so they seek Him and want his things?Jesus summed it weel in the parable of the wheat and tares. Teh tares looked just like wheatr until near harvest time when the wheat would bend from the germ and the tares would still be Straight up. So a fake believe can kinow th elanguage, act like us, do great things, but never trusted in the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus for their salvation.
We know that, but who made it so they seek Him and want his things?
Follow the posts back to the point being addressed.
But the point I was making is there is no change of heart in the false believer. Yet they reach out to God without aid of God.It is god who changes our hearts!
Remember this passage in Phillipians 2
12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.
It is god who firsts puts in us to do His will (including getting saved) and then He empowers us to do so.
But the point I was making is there is no change of heart in the false believer. Yet they reach out to God without aid of God.
The doctrine of election is not what is in dispute. What it actually means is what is in dispute.
Calvinists say you are chosen because God predetermined that you will be a believer.
Arminists say you are chosen by God because you became a believer.