(Jonous;25415)
Hehe exactly the whole point, nobody can. Science is (or better should be) based on what can be observed and studied. Neither of those can be done when talking about the origin of life...Pay a visit here http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/young.asp and you will read some very interesting articles.Praise God.
Praise God? I agree to praise our Lord and give him worship, but you honestly submit that as proper to be proud of?Please, visit www.talkorigins.organswersingenesis is much better than Dr. Dino, but it remains nonobjective and unscientific in it's approach. It also makes some very misleading claims. Notice that scientists who don't begin as creation scientists or proponents of ID, or scientists of the "critical analysis of Evolution" movement {which are all Carbon copies of each other} don't ever become convinced on the basis of science that their propositions are correct.Basically, no scientist who begins his search objectively ends up having the conclusions that these movements have. Period. You need to begin with a conclusion to get a conclusion so clearly in contrast with all the evidence.I know you aren't a science student, however, I sincerely recommend going to www.talkorigins.orgFurthermore, I would suggest, once again, that you take 2 hours of your life, sit back, and watch this fairly enjoyable video of Ken Miller being a guest speaker concerning this issue.http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=JVRsWAjvQSgIn Hope,~Tyrel
Hehe exactly the whole point, nobody can. Science is (or better should be) based on what can be observed and studied. Neither of those can be done when talking about the origin of life...Pay a visit here http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/young.asp and you will read some very interesting articles.Praise God.
Praise God? I agree to praise our Lord and give him worship, but you honestly submit that as proper to be proud of?Please, visit www.talkorigins.organswersingenesis is much better than Dr. Dino, but it remains nonobjective and unscientific in it's approach. It also makes some very misleading claims. Notice that scientists who don't begin as creation scientists or proponents of ID, or scientists of the "critical analysis of Evolution" movement {which are all Carbon copies of each other} don't ever become convinced on the basis of science that their propositions are correct.Basically, no scientist who begins his search objectively ends up having the conclusions that these movements have. Period. You need to begin with a conclusion to get a conclusion so clearly in contrast with all the evidence.I know you aren't a science student, however, I sincerely recommend going to www.talkorigins.orgFurthermore, I would suggest, once again, that you take 2 hours of your life, sit back, and watch this fairly enjoyable video of Ken Miller being a guest speaker concerning this issue.http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=JVRsWAjvQSgIn Hope,~Tyrel