1. Worldwide Economic Crash.
This comes first, and sets the stage for the rest of it. Wilkerson used the words "persecution madness," while other visions use the words "rage" and "lawlessness," but financial collapse will cause societal breakdowns on a scale the world hasn't seen before. Mobs numbering in the hundreds of thousands will sweep through cities destroying everything in their path, and governments will not be able to control their populaces. Crime elements like gangs and drug cartels will gain the upper hand in many regions because of inadequate police funding and protection, so cops will simply have to stand by while murders are committed out in the open.
What year has this not been prophesied to happen at least once? Most years have at least 2 or 3 "highly regarded" prophecies of Economic Crash next month . . . in 6 months . . . next year. Every single times they've failed (Oh, except in the prophecies for 2008 ding ding ding! Got it! Oh, wait, not the Big Crash) all have failed.
I've seen the same thing with World War, or even limited nuclear attack. I have a friend who has lettered the side of his car to say that Jesus is returning in 2021. He had a vision. His life now is drive that Corvette all over the nation to proclaim the good news.
I've seen prophecy fulfilled, and false prophecies galore. Failed and false prophecies that their believers hang onto, trying to say, but look, this part happened, and that part could be happening over there, and trying to make it still be true.
But what when we examine the prophecy in the cold light of day, not hoping it's real, not trying to make it work, but to see, what is truly being said, what is the speaker getting at here? And was that what happened?
Prophecy economic crash every year and one year you'll be right. But you won't be. You'll just happen to be there at the time.
Prophecies that don't happen are false. Prophecies that don't happen the way the prophet says are false. And prophecies that contradict the Bible are false. God doesn't contradict Himself.
I really think we need to approach these things not with the supposition that every word we hear is true, given that so many have been false.
I'm not afraid to disqualify the prophecy that doesn't meet with this standard. But that's just me.
It's easy to get a feel for this. Reading through back pages of the Elijah List, for example. So many prophecies you can still read on their site that didn't happen.
An easy example is the prophecy from Kim Clement in 2004 about Osama bin Ladin's capture, and the turn on the war. These didn't happen, and the prophet started to waffle. I've seen that repeat itself over and over.
How off can a prophet be? Do they really have to 100% accurate? Is 80% enough? 20%?
Alright . . . rant over . . . I hope! But isn't there a better way?
Much love!