Christ4Me
Well-Known Member
Enoch illustrates the godless need of fundamentalists who don't know Greek to mindlessly pontificate on what Greek words mean, using outdated and linguistically incompentence concordances to compensate for their ignorance. the massive articles of the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament delve into the secular Greek usage, the usage in Judaism and the OT, and the usage in the NT and early Christianity of all the spiritually relevant words in the NT.
Where in the scripture does it instruct future believers to study the Greek because the message or meaning of His words can be lost in translation to a foreign tongue for us to have any wisdom in knowing what is truly written?
The fact that Bible versions do not all agree with John 6:63 & 2 Corinthians 3:6 as not pertaining to the Holy Spirit goes to show the limitation of understanding the Greek with man's wisdom today. This is why the modified Nicene creed of 381 A.D. crediting the Holy Spirit as the Giver of Life is wrong when Jesus is as the Bread of life that gives life to the world by coming to & believing in Him John 6:30-36
So which scripture is correct? Scripture testifies Whom that the scripture points to for us to come to in order to have life; John 5:39-40
That's wisdom from the Lord that trumps the wisdom of knowing Greek.
The lengthy article on "glossai" in vol. I makes the point that this word need not mean "human languages." In secular Greek usage "glossai" can mean not a human language, but "an expression which in speech or manner is strange or obscure and needs explanation...There are various kinds (12:10, 28; cf. 14:10); some are tongues of men and others of angels (13:1)." [pp. 720, 722].
You just testified that angelic tongues are gibberish nonsense and yet we find scripture testifying to familiar spirits as speaking gibberish nonsense.
Isaiah 8:19 And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead?
If the angels can testify to us in the language we can understand, then what need to speak to them in gibberish nonsense as of by the Holy Ghost?
In 14:12 Paul rightly views the Corinthians as "zealots of spirits" and therefore as utterers of the "tongues of angels" of 13:1. Hermas Mandates 11 (c. 105 AD) confirms this understanding of ecstatic prophetic gifts as angel speech.
Yet in context, Paul is referring to spiritual gifts and not tongues of spirits nor tongues of angels for surely there are tongues of fallen angels.
Fundamentalists here have been led astray by the unique outburst of comprehensible human tongues in Acts 2.
As many did understand the wonderful works of God in their native foreign tongue, recognizing that the disciples only spoken Galileans, some bystander beside them mocked because they did not know the language they were speaking in & so assumed they were drunk. If they were falling down as if drunk, I am sure the devout Jews from all nations have seen that to just keep on walking and not be mystified by that at all.
Its comprehensible nature prompts Peter to identify this speaking in tongues as the "prophesying" foretold in Joel 2 (see Acts 2:17).
Since these devout Jews knew they spoke Galilean is why Peter spoke in his native language to them all when he did in getting them all to listen including those whom were mocking them as being drunk. Peter can't be falling down while saying that to them all or else, again, they'd be walking.
Elsewhere in Acts Luke carefully distinguishes tongues from prophesying (19:6) because the outbursts of tongues in Cornelius' household and at Ephesus are neither interpreted nor comprehensible languages to the speakers.
But others understood it as a foreign language for why it was God's gifts of tongues that the speaker was uttering & not gibberish nonsense as if by a wizard or a medium and the Bible has informed them and us how they speak by familiar spirits is gibberish nonsense.
That would make God the copy cat of Satan's tongues rather than the other way around since Satan's tongue was before Pentecost as found in Isiaah 8:19. That means any pagan supernatural tongue that is gibberish nonsense is not the real God's gift of tongues that came at Pentecost.