Where does it say that "2 Peter 2:4, Jude 1:6 nor Revelation 9 ... happened before the Flood"? You keep making statements like this up without presenting any hard evidence to support it. What you are submitting is just your own private interpretation. Isn't it interesting that the demonic occupants of the abyss are all released before the last trumpet in Revelation 9? That reinforces the Amil thesis.
Death and the grave have been wholly conquered. Satan can no longer keep people in the bondage of death. Christ has defeated death. When someone encounters Christ they experience eternal life, and they shall never die. When Jesus comes the last vestige of death - physical death - is banished forever.
2 Corinthians 1:9-10 tells us: "we had the sentence of death in ourselves, that we should not trust in ourselves, but in God which raiseth [Gr. egeiro] the dead: Who delivered us (past tense) from so great a death, and doth deliver (present tense): in whom we trust that he will yet deliver us (future tense)."
This whole passage is concentrated upon the great eternal provision of spiritual deliverance. The word “raiseth” in this reading is a present active verb, therefore it is talking about a resurrection that is happening now, rather than the future physical resurrection. This is obviously speaking of spiritual resurrection because it alone has been ongoing since Christ’s first (physical) resurrection. This will, of course, culminate with the general physical resurrection at His return.
Paul goes on then to emphasize the victorious ongoing hope that the risen saints have through salvation, regardless of what is arrayed against them. He is reminding the believer of the security that exists “in Christ.” Whilst justification is an act (when we are spiritually redeemed) and glorification also an act (when we are physically redeemed), sanctification is a process of making us more like Christ. In all three experiences Christ holds a firm grip upon His people. He looks after them, and sustains them along the way. Christ therefore has “delivered,” (past tense) “doth deliver” (currently) and “will yet deliver” (future tense).
Where does it say Satan keeps any one at any time in the bondage of sin and death? Adam placed us in the bondage of sin and death, not Satan. Romans 5:12-18
"Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
(For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come."
1 Corinthians 15:21-22
"For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive."
There is no verse in Scripture that states when the angels rebelled. There are verses that point to when it could have happened.
1 Peter 3:19-20
"By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water."
Those prior to the Flood were already placed in the pit. The pit was never made for humans but for the angels that rebelled.
Matthew 25:41
"Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:"
So we can know that the place was prepared prior to those who died in the Flood of Noah's day.
I never gave my opinion, but I don't think the angels followed Satan, until they were convinced Satan could get Humans to turn against God. I don't think they just followed Satan, because. Obviously it states the whole human government symbolized by the 7 headed dragon cast the stars to the earth, not just a single angel by himself.
I think when Satan deceived Eve, and then Adam disobeyed, is when those angels went on strike, and left their posts in defiance to God. Jude pointed out they were immediately chained in the pit. So the pit was prepared when they rebelled, not for those who died in the Flood.
No verse indicates the pit or prison was formed at the time of the Flood, and then the angels rebelled years later when Nimrod built the tower of Babel.
"And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel."
"Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth."
Peter places the rebellion prior to the Flood.
Jude gives no order as he talks about Israel leaving Egypt, then the rebel angels, and then Sodom and Gomorrah.
The point is that both Peter and Jude places them in context with ancient events. I guess most human theology get their false teachings about the angels from extra biblical sources. To which I don't agree with at all. You question me, while theologians have already pointed out time frames which the church has accepted hook line and sinker even if wrong, such as Amil itself. There is more in Scripture about fallen angels than there is about Amil, and that is not saying much at all, as they are only mentioned in 2 Peter 2, Jude, and Revelation 9 and 12.
The release of the angels as the first woe in conjunction with the 5th Trumpet is not an Amil proof text. It is the fulfillment of what Jude quoted about them. Revelation 20:7 is not about a day of Judgment.
"And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,"
That is not the same event as Jude 1:6
"He hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day."
You are adding stuff into the text, and then falsely accusing Premil of doing the same thing, forcing Jesus on earth in the same context. Jesus is on the earth in context of Revelation. The Revelation is all about the revealing of Jesus to the earth and on the earth. That is the whole point. Changing history around to suit an ideology is not the point.
But Revelation 20 could chronologically come immediately after Revelation 12.
"And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years."
Just because Satan wants to do something, does not mean God always allows Satan to do something. Satan is bound from deceiving the nations to battle. Things have changed during that thousand years of being bound. Yet Satan still wants that battle. How can Amil claim that the binding of Satan in the first century prevented a war that would destroy the remnant of Israel's seed? Jerusalem was literally wiped off the map, and the remnant Jews scattered across the earth. And Amil have to admit it was while they have Satan bound. Then you move the goal post and claim it is spiritual talking about the inclusion of the church. That while Satan is bound, the church will be that remnant. How is 2.6 billion people a remnant of Israel? And according to your own teaching that is all of Israel, not a remnant. Do you have a verse stating Satan has an army that attacks 2.6 billion humans?
