Where are you getting these ideas? Where is your proof? The word parable means 'moral story', not a retelling of history.
The greek text of the Gospels use the word parables. But if you pay attention, Jesus words were not what we describe or understand by the modern term parable. Jesus was not teaching with the parables of our standart and deffinitions.
I got that from preaparing the harmony of the Gospels. After having all Gospels in a chronologicay order, the next step was to date very ting on it. I did it and the wors situation i have in all the harmony is a window of one week. I did determione thye exact time, day and date of each of the event; being the less acurate a situation of a week window. After having all in chronological in chronological order, and having all dated; it comes to my eyes how Jesus was talking according to the time and place in wich he was.
Trying to confirm that situation I wen to a wine place inquiring about how wine was prepared in the times of Jesus. It happens (God hand?) that the man that I aproached knew all about and he askme if i was interested in the roman wine or the jew wine. Then he toldme all the prosses of jew wine, how long it takes and in what time it is transfered to other oders (I dont know the english word) It happens that the transferece of wine it is done in the same time I had dated the wine parable. It is obvious - at least for me - that when Jesus told that parable, he was passing by or watching at, some jew transfering wine.
The woman that marries ten brothers? I can tell you who she was. The King that before going to war sent embassador for peace? I can tell you who he was. Those qhere persons very well known of the jew. The samariotanian helping the guy at the road? I can not tell you, but i asume that as well as all other parables, it was a real case very well know at that time. Any way, that parable was told in Jerusalem, not far from it really hapened. The Samaritanian was traveling to Jerusalem, and Jesus told the parable at Jerusalem. The same way, Jesus is sayin parables of sheeps while at Judea, and parables of crop while at Galily.
Is that a imprtant issue? Is it a doctrinal matter?
Today pastors have a good set of ficticious parables...modern and imaginary parables. They are called illustrations. There is book with ilustrations for pastors to use. The point is that Jesus did never use a imaginary ilustration, but always used real facts.
Is it too ofensive for you? What is the problem? Isnt good to learn somethinmg new about Jesus and the Gospels? Or is it unaceptable for pastors and theologians to be teach for somebody like me with not official instruction? Is that insulting them? Is it that bad that nobody until me did sussed in preaparing a harmony of the Gospels? Are you ashamed for the situation? Is that theyr position of famous theologians is in risk? What is the problem on me sharing the truth I have be enlioghted with?
