Sounds like you promoting Salvation because of race too
You are the one making it about human emotions and racial attributes.
God had already decided since creation who He will choose at the Second Coming to be the 144k, and they don't even have a choice in that decision process.
God can save whom He chooses, and I am not even talking about Reformed theology which claims no one has a choice.
You are forcing the ability to freely choose Salvation onto these 144k, and calling all who don’t agree with you, racist.
Salvation according to the free gift offered to humanity does not deal with races. It deals with a personal choice to accept God or reject God. That is the difference between a wild olive branch, and a natural branch. A natural branch cannot choose to be natural or wild. God makes that choice. Since the moment on the Cross, when Jesus said it is finished, all the natural branches were severed, and they were now just as wild as the wild branches were. That was the removal of the veil from the Holy of Holies. But you have turned the natural branches into some kind of spiritual symbolism, instead of just accepting that natural branches will become natural branches again at the moment of the Second Coming. Those 144k will have no choice in their salvation experience like the OT Israel had no choice, but works and their belief or unbelief.
You fail to see how being cut off as a natural branch is different than never being a part as a wild branch in the physical aspect of birth. Has nothing to do with being racist, but many here want it to be about race, instead of God declaring some natural branches, and others wild.
You are calling God racist on the very fact the majority of humans are wild branches, while God made some natural branches from physical birth. No one is a spiritual natural branch, because Reformed theology is wrong. Paul said:
"For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off. And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again. For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?"
No one since the Cross has been able to claim to be the elect, the natural branches. But all are spiritually elected by God, and can freely come, so God can cut them out of the wild tree, and graft them into the second birth. That is the gift of Salvation and has always been the case since Adam disobeyed God. But since Jacob, God called out natural branches based on physical birth, and that was the case until the Cross. Since the Cross physical Jacob has been placed in partial blindness, and none are natural branches. But Reformed theology based on amil eschatology, declares there is no restoration of Jacob after the Second Coming, and it is they who declare God a racist, because they reject this part as pertaining to the Second Coming, but place it at the first coming:
"For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins."
Paul never said the Cross fulfilled that promise. God extended Salvation to the Gentiles, which was a mystery to Jacob. This promise is not a spiritual fulfillment. This promise will be the physical completion of the work of a physical Jesus as Physical King of Israel as the Prince to come in Daniel 9.
The natural branches have not experienced this promise as natural branches, because they were cut off, while the Gentiles were being grafted in, thus they also had to be grafted in. Now you call God a racist for not letting His own people be natural branches.
"As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes.... For God hath concluded them all (natural Israel) in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all (the entire world)."
God placed Israel (the natural branches) in an awkward position (unbelief), for the very sake of the Gentiles being grafted in, and all people can do today is argue that God is racist, and replace Israel with two Israels and spiritualize the whole process in their failed human theology and understanding. I guess you may as well call the Apostle Paul racist for writing words that go against your learned theological viewpoint, no? Jesus said when He was about to finish the work of obedience, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do". They had to be placed into unbelief by God, or the Cross would not have happened.
I am beginning to think the church has been placed in unbelief about the Second Coming. How else are they supposed to be so apostate as to look for an AC instead of the physical return of Jesus as King?
