There is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between assumptions and implications. Today, there are way too many Christians who expect the Bible to read like a textbook on Systematic Theology. If they do not find an exact statement of some kind, for them it means that the truth is not there. That is why spiritual discernment is required to understand Scripture.
Assumption: "a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof."
Yes, implication is different, and at times we are to draw them from scripture. But on these occasions we do so from other scriptures that speak about the subject in question. We pool together what we know about it to make "informed" implications.
Insisting that 1) the Restrainer is the Holy Spirit, and 2) therefore the Church has to be gone for that 'Restrainer' to also be gone...is not implication. It fits neatly into the category of assumption.
Unless you can provide biblical evidence for your informed, implied reasoning..?
1. Only God can restrain Satan. Study Job if you are not familiar with this fundamental truth. It is God who has appointed the Holy Spirit to be on earth to fulfil a number of ministries since Pentecost, including the restraint of evil. The full impact of Satanic deception is being withheld until the appropriate time.
I keep saying this, but apparently you guys have selective hearing (reading..?). Maybe the actual bible verse will make my point clearer:
Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding in his hand the key to the bottomless pit and a great chain. And he seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years, and threw him into the pit, and shut it and sealed it over him.. -Revelation 20:1–3
et, voila. One angel, restraining Satan.
Also:
For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only he who now restrains it will do so until he is out of the way.-2 Thessalonians 2:7
Clearly evil is not being 'restrained'. Lawlessness abounds now. It will get worse then.
2. The Church -- the Body of Christ -- is indwelt by the Holy Spirit. If the Spirit is taken out of the way, then it follows that the Church too is taken out of the way. Which means that the Rapture will be followed by the appearance of the Antichrist.
See, this is just another assumption. Where does it say that the Church HAS to leave? You cannot even prove it is the HS, let alone that there is a rule that the HS within the Church must leave before the Lawless one can be revealed. It's a big bunch of assumptions that follow on from one another.
Yes the Church is indwelt. But there is absolutely nothing preventing the HS (if he is the Restrainer) from withdrawing his 'restraint' from a particular area to allow this to come about. For example: one of the reasons the world has not completely imploded is because of God's common grace. The grace he extends to even those who are not his. If he withdraws this? If his grace only remains on believers? Then you will see the chaos and evil you paint, mark my words.
That scenario, also, is an assumption. But it is no more or less of an assumption than yours.
3. The evidence for this is that between Revelation 6 and 18 you will NOT find the word "church" or "churches". That is in marked contrast to the first three chapters.This portion of Revelation corresponds to the time when the Antichrist will be in control, which will be followed by the Great Tribulation.
That is not proof, sorry. That's like saying "the book of James and Philemon don't mention the Holy Spirit, so he's not on earth in the believers then".
Or, that the word 'church' also doesn't appear in Titus, Hebrews and 1 & 2 Peter, therefore the Church must be "gone" then as well.
We see the word "Saints" used all throughout the NT, so the fact that it is used for believers in Revelation shouldn't be seen as a "special code" that the Church has been whisked away. And if there are believers there, it becomes, once again, only assumption that the Church as a whole was taken away, and that these new 'Saints', are somehow a different category of believer.