CoreIssue
Well-Known Member
The problem is you post what you think they mean when they didn't.I post what the Bible prophets wrote.
Therefore you must want to correct them, as what they tell us contradicts your beliefs.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The problem is you post what you think they mean when they didn't.I post what the Bible prophets wrote.
Therefore you must want to correct them, as what they tell us contradicts your beliefs.
There is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between assumptions and implications. Today, there are way too many Christians who expect the Bible to read like a textbook on Systematic Theology. If they do not find an exact statement of some kind, for them it means that the truth is not there. That is why spiritual discernment is required to understand Scripture.When it comes to God's word...assumptions shouldn't come into it at all, not for something this important.
Yes, that is clearer. But...it still doesn't explain why the Church must leave. Yes, I know the HS is present within 'The Church'. But if we're talking, strictly, about the HS moving aside specifically to let the Man of Lawlessness forward, then there is still nothing that necessitates the Church from having to be gone.It is not an ipso facto situation. You are still seeing the Church being removed because you want it to be, not because it has to be, or because the text demands it.
Because revelation 3:10 says we will not be part of the hour testing, but the whole world will. So we can't be here.
If that the restrainer steps aside and we're here then we would be a primary target of Satan and that verse would be a lie.
So yes, the text demands it.
I'm not sure that I ever suggested that the Restrainer was the Antichrist himself. Because you are right...it hardly makes sense that the Antichrist must be taken out of the way before the Antichrist can be revealed.
Really? But that brings us back to the Angel locking away, or 'restraining' Satan in Rev 20, and the Antichrist is just a man, is he not? Sure, the angel would have done so in the name of God, but all angels would act on and under the authority, and therefore power of, their Lord and God.
But Satan is not lockeda way currently.
The AC is a demon processed man, just as the false prophet will be. But he is not the man of lawlessness, because has been active throughout history.
Or...what if it IS the HS? It could indeed be the HS. But as I mentioned before, there is nothing in the text, or reason itself, to suggest that the HS, 'stepping back' in that area, necessitates the Church leaving. It is only assumption on a grand scale that suggests that the Church as a whole HAS to leave for the HS to do that. Where does it say, suggest or even hint at that process in scripture?
Not sure what else to say except the holy spirit cannot be here if the church he operates through is also here.
I think God can do anything. If Jesus Christ can be both man and God...laying aside his divinity, but, if he had chosen to, able to take it back up in an instant...but stil...fully man...I think we can say that in the mystery and power of God...the HS can remain in us, but "release the Kraken", so to speak.
No. Because during the trib everyone on the earth will be subject to testing.
It does? Well...show me where it names the HS as the restrainer, specifically.
As for alternatives...please read above.
As shown, your alternatives do not work.
There is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between assumptions and implications. Today, there are way too many Christians who expect the Bible to read like a textbook on Systematic Theology. If they do not find an exact statement of some kind, for them it means that the truth is not there. That is why spiritual discernment is required to understand Scripture.
1. Only God can restrain Satan. Study Job if you are not familiar with this fundamental truth. It is God who has appointed the Holy Spirit to be on earth to fulfil a number of ministries since Pentecost, including the restraint of evil. The full impact of Satanic deception is being withheld until the appropriate time.
2. The Church -- the Body of Christ -- is indwelt by the Holy Spirit. If the Spirit is taken out of the way, then it follows that the Church too is taken out of the way. Which means that the Rapture will be followed by the appearance of the Antichrist.
3. The evidence for this is that between Revelation 6 and 18 you will NOT find the word "church" or "churches". That is in marked contrast to the first three chapters.This portion of Revelation corresponds to the time when the Antichrist will be in control, which will be followed by the Great Tribulation.
There is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between assumptions and implications. Today, there are way too many Christians who expect the Bible to read like a textbook on Systematic Theology. If they do not find an exact statement of some kind, for them it means that the truth is not there. That is why spiritual discernment is required to understand Scripture.
I keep saying this, but apparently you guys have selective hearing (reading..?). Maybe the actual bible verse will make my point clearer:1. Only God can restrain Satan. Study Job if you are not familiar with this fundamental truth. It is God who has appointed the Holy Spirit to be on earth to fulfil a number of ministries since Pentecost, including the restraint of evil. The full impact of Satanic deception is being withheld until the appropriate time.
See, this is just another assumption. Where does it say that the Church HAS to leave? You cannot even prove it is the HS, let alone that there is a rule that the HS within the Church must leave before the Lawless one can be revealed. It's a big bunch of assumptions that follow on from one another.2. The Church -- the Body of Christ -- is indwelt by the Holy Spirit. If the Spirit is taken out of the way, then it follows that the Church too is taken out of the way. Which means that the Rapture will be followed by the appearance of the Antichrist.
3. The evidence for this is that between Revelation 6 and 18 you will NOT find the word "church" or "churches". That is in marked contrast to the first three chapters.This portion of Revelation corresponds to the time when the Antichrist will be in control, which will be followed by the Great Tribulation.
Yes, that is clearer. But...it still doesn't explain why the Church must leave.
Because revelation 3:10 says we will not be part of the hour testing, but the whole world will. So we can't be here.
If that the restrainer steps aside and we're here then we would be a primary target of Satan and that verse would be a lie.
So yes, the text demands it.
But Satan is not lockeda way currently.
The AC is a demon processed man, just as the false prophet will be. But he is not the man of lawlessness, because has been active throughout history.
Wait, what? The Holy Spirit cannot be here unless the Church is? Except all the time when he was when the Church wasn't. You know...all that time before Pentecost? And since when are we saying what God can and can't do, and where he can and can't go??Not sure what else to say except the holy spirit cannot be here if the church he operates through is also here.
No. Because during the trib everyone on the earth will be subject to testing.
As shown, your alternatives do not work.
If Rev 3:10 says we will not be a part of the hour of testing, it still does not say we will be yanked off the planet. And we also must take into consideration Jesus words here:
Sorry, I have to do some triming to meet the word count limit.
I do not ask that you take them out of the world, -John 17:15
That verse isn't not talking about an event that will hit every one on the whole earth. Is localized, so taken of the local area and it is tereo ek
We know it is quite possible for God to protect his own amongst trial and hardship and judgement
That was not about judgment or testing from God. The tribulation tests the whole world.
.
The promise of God to spare his followers his wrath
None of what you've listed is tribulation period, the time of testing. It is not from God. You are talking out of context.
So, no, the text does not demand it.
It most assuredly does.
Putting aside all the plainly stated prophesies of the Old Testament, that vividly describe the forthcoming Day of the Lord's fiery wrath that will come upon everyone, there are a few NT scriptures that you avoid because they blow your fanciful belief of a 'rapture to heaven' out of the water:The problem is you post what you think they mean when they didn't.
If Rev 3:10 says we will not be a part of the hour of testing, it still does not say we will be yanked off the planet. And we also must take into consideration Jesus words here:
Putting aside all the plainly stated prophesies of the Old Testament, that vividly describe the forthcoming Day of the Lord's fiery wrath that will come upon everyone, there are a few NT scriptures that you avoid because they blow your fanciful belief of a 'rapture to heaven' out of the water:
Matthew 3:11-12...Jesus will baptize you with fire, coming with His winnowing fork, purging His house.....
1 Corinthians 3:13 We will all be tested by fire......
1 Peter 4:12 Do not be surprised by the fiery ordeal that will come to test you....
Hebrews 10:26-27...only a terrifying expectation of a fierce fire.....
Hebrews 12:7-8 You must endure God's discipline and testing, for if you escape this, for all must partake of it, then you are illegitimate and not His true children.
So YOUR problem is that the Bible doesn't say what you think it means.
Lying is the natural language of pretribbers. They say Rev 3:10 teaches the pre-trib rapture. You're right that Rev 3:10 doesn't say the church of Sardis will be yanked off the planet. It says they'll be watched or protected, in other words they'll stay right on Earth during the "testing". Another problem for the pretribbers is that this is said to the church of Sardis, a First-century church, not a 21st-century church, so it was a first-century testing Sardis was offered protection from. Those liars, pretribbers, claim the seven churches represent seven church ages. They claim Laodicea, not Sardis, represents the last church age, so what's said to Sardis can't be applied to today.
Hahahaha... You didn't prove the Rapture, you proved that Christ was slain before the foundation of the world!Most Christians do not seem to understand the biblical necessity of a Pretribulation Rapture. But a proper study of the whole Bible confirms that it is a divine necessity. Here are the reasons why it is necessary for the Church (the children of God on earth, Jews and Gentiles in one Body) to be taken out, and taken up to Heaven, before the reign of the Antichrist, and the Tribulation and Great Tribulation which are connected to his reign.
1. The Antichrist cannot take TOTAL CONTROL of the earth until and unless the Church (indwelt by the Holy Spirit) and the Holy Spirit Himself are “taken out of the way”. The Holy Spirit is the Divine Restrainer of Satan and the Antichrist. See 2 Thessalonians 2.
2. The Tribulation is primarily an expression of the wrath of Satan against the Jews, and particularly against the believing remnant of Jews (Daniel 12 and Revelation 12). This is called “the time of Jacob’s trouble” and has nothing to do with the Church. At the same time, God begins to pour out His judgments upon the earth. There are seven trumpet judgments, and the first six belong to this period. Revelation 8-13.
3. It is the Antichrist who sets up the Abomination of Desolation in the future temple at Jerusalem. This is called “the image of the Beast” in Revelation 13. And all those who refuse to worship this image are beheaded. These are the Tribulation saints (primarily Jews), since the whole Church is certainly not beheaded.
4. It is the Abomination of Desolation which triggers the Great Tribulation on earth (see Matthew 24). The seventh trumpet judgment belongs to this period (Revelation 14-18). While that is happening on earth, the saints are all in Heaven for two reasons: (1) attendance at the Judgment Seat of Christ, in order to have their works judged, and to receive their rewards (2 Corinthians 5:10 and other passages) and (2) attendance at the Marriage of the Lamb as the Bride of Christ (Revelation 19). The Church is not only the Body and Building of Christ, but also the Bride of Christ, and unless the Marriage of the Lamb is accomplished, the Lord will not return to earth with His saints and angels (Revelation 19).
5. The Tribulation is during the first half of Daniel’s 70th week (3 ½ years) while the Great Tribulation (also called the Day of the Lord) is during the second half of this week of years (3 ½ years, less some months). This entire period has nothing to do with the Church, and corresponds to Revelation 6-18. And it is significant that in these chapters of Revelation there is no mention of “church” “the church” or “churches”.
You would have to strain at (out) gnats and swallow camels to come to that conclusion.:)Hahahaha... You didn't prove the Rapture, you proved that Christ was crucified before the foundation of the world!
Hahahaha... You didn't prove the Rapture, you proved that Christ was slain before the foundation of the world!
Your lengthy posting of word definitions had nary a scintilla of proof of a rapture.You obviously did not read my post above it contained a lot of proofs.
The Lord is completing His DIVISION...
why would you believe His Church would remain ON Earth?
God Bless,
Taken
Here it is in the Greek.
10 'Because you have kept the word of My perseverance, I also will keep you from the hour of testing, that hour which is about to come upon the whole world, to test those who dwell on the earth. o&ti CONJ ejthvrhsa? V-AAI-2S to;n T-ASM lovgon N-ASM th'? T-GSF uJpomonh'? N-GSF mou, P-1GS kajgwv P-1NS se P-2AS thrhvsw V-FAI-1S ejk PREP th'? T-GSF w&ra? N-GSF tou' T-GSM peirasmou' N-GSM th'? T-GSF mellouvsh? V-PAP-GSF e~rcesqai V-PNN ejpi; PREP th'? T-GSF oijkoumevnh? N-GSF o&lh? A-GSF peiravsai V-AAN tou;? T-APM katoikou'nta? V-PAP-APM ejpi; PREP th'? T-GSF gh'?. N-GSF
Strong's Number: 5083
Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
threvw from teros (a watch, perhaps akin to (2334))
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Tereo 8:140,1174
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
tay-reh'-o Verb
Definition
The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon
- to attend to carefully, take care of
- to guard
- metaph. to keep, one in the state in which he is
- to observe
- to reserve: to undergo something
Strong's Number: 1537 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
ejk a primary preposition denoting origin (the point whence action or motion proceeds), from, out (of place, time, or cause
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Ek literal or figurative
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ekPreposition
Definition
- out of, from, by, away from
The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon
Strong's Number: 5610 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
w&ra apparently a primary word
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Hora 9:675,1355
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ho'-rah Noun Feminine
Definition
- a certain definite time or season fixed by natural law and returning with the revolving year
- of the seasons of the year, spring, summer, autumn, winter
- the daytime (bounded by the rising and setting of the sun), a day
- a twelfth part of the day-time, an hour, (the twelve hours of the day are reckoned from the rising to the setting of the sun)
- any definite time, point of time, moment
The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon
Strong's Number: 3986 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
peirasmovß from (3985)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Peirasmos 6:23,822
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
pi-ras-mos' Noun Masculine
Definition
- an experiment, attempt, trial, proving
- trial, proving: the trial made of you by my bodily condition, since condition served as to test the love of the Galatians toward Paul (Gal. 4:
- the trial of man's fidelity, integrity, virtue, constancy
- an enticement to sin, temptation, whether arising from the desires or from the outward circumstances
- an internal temptation to sin 1b
- of the temptation by which the devil sought to divert Jesus the Messiah from his divine errand
- of the condition of things, or a mental state, by which we are enticed to sin, or to a lapse from the faith and holiness
- adversity, affliction, trouble: sent by God and serving to test or prove one's character, faith, holiness
- temptation (i.e. trial) of God by men
- rebellion against God, by which his power and justice are, as it were, put to the proof and challenged to show themselves
Oh, what absolute rubbish! I have never heard anything that ridiculous in my life! As I've said before...I know, and have known many 'pretribbers' and not only haven't they been liars, but they've been incredible, wonderful people of God I only hope I can live up to.Lying is the natural language of pretribbers.