Does everyone here understand WHERE Paul gets his Olive Tree analogy from?
Jeremiah 11:9-17 KJV
9. And the Lord said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
10. They are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods to serve them: the house of Israel and the house of Judah have broken my covenant which I made with their fathers.
11. Therefore thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will bring evil upon them, which they shall not be able to escape; and though they shall cry unto me, I will not hearken unto them.
12. Then shall the cities of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem go, and cry unto the gods unto whom they offer incense: but they shall not save them at all in the time of their trouble.
13. For according to the number of thy cities were thy gods, O Judah; and according to the number of the streets of Jerusalem have ye set up altars to that shameful thing, even altars to burn incense unto Baal. [each one to his own master]
14. Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up a cry or prayer for them: for I will not hear them in the time that they cry unto me for their trouble.
15. What hath my beloved to do in mine house, seeing she hath wrought lewdness with many, and the holy flesh is passed from thee? when thou doest evil, then thou rejoicest.
16. The Lord called thy name, A green olive tree, fair, and of goodly fruit: with the noise of a great tumult he hath kindled fire upon it, and the branches of it are broken.
17. For the Lord of hosts, that planted thee, hath pronounced evil against thee, for the evil of the house of Israel and of the house of Judah, which they have done against themselves to provoke me to anger in offering incense unto Baal.
The house of Israel and the house of Judah, although separate, are of the same Olive Tree which the Father himself, the Husbandman, has planted. Does everyone here agree then with the following statement?
"The Lord called thy name, A green olive tree, fair, and of goodly fruit: with the noise of a great tumult he hath kindled fire upon it, and the branches of it are broken. For the Lord of hosts, that planted thee, hath pronounced evil against thee, for the evil of the house of Israel and of the house of Judah, which they have done against themselves to provoke me to anger in offering incense unto Baal."
Does everyone agree that when we see analogies made in the New Testament writings we should give precedent to any passages from the Old Testament which speak of the same things in the same terms? Is there anyone here that is willing to say that Paul does not reference Jeremiah 11 in Romans 11?
The same thing happens with the house of Israel and the house of Judah throughout Jeremiah, (as others have already stated).
In the famous Jeremiah 31 New Covenant passage the same thing occurs once again:
Jeremiah 31:26-34 KJV
26. Upon this I awaked, and beheld; my sleep was sweet unto me. [Re: Acts 2 dreams and visions]
27. Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast.
28. And it shall come to pass, that like as I have watched over them, to pluck up, and to break down, and to throw down, and to destroy, and to afflict; so will I watch over them, to build, and to plant, saith the Lord.
29. In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge.
30. But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge.
31. Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
32. Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord:
33. But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
34. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
One would therefore expect that if the house of Israel and the house of Judah were all combined into the nation of the Jews then this should be recognized in the New Covenant writings correct? Is it not fair to say that this should be the case? Especially in light of the fact that this is what some are teaching here? In other words where is the evidence if the author of Hebrews quotes the passage verbatim?
Hebrews 8:8-12 KJV
8. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
9. Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
10. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
11. And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.
12. For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
13. In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
There are two ways to see the two houses becoming one; the man with the eyes and mind of the flesh will see the two houses as now a single nation of Jewish peoples of the flesh living in a single nation found on his Armageddon WWIII maps of the Middle East. The only other way is for the man with eyes and mind of Yeshua, (putting on the mind of Messiah) to walk around Zion through all twelve gates of the twelve tribes, take up his cross and follow Messiah, and become a Jew of the circumcision of the heart, taking up "the fear of the Jews" as the people of Persia did in the days of Mordecai and Esther, (which fear of the Jews is the healthy fear of the Most High our heavenly Father) and be crucified with Messiah outside the camp, outside the city. In so doing the same will have brought with him his eleven brethren and in such a manner all Israel shall be saved; each in his appointed times: "to the Jew first", (you becoming "IN MESSIAH") "and then to the Greek", (all the "members" of your own "household" being immersed into your doctrine). Then shall the man become "one new man" in Messiah; each in his or her own appointed times. However, these things will likely be rejected by most if not all. But remember that they are supernal and spiritual; and although it may take time for those who truly care about knowing the truth; these things cannot be understood or proven outside of the doctrines, parables, and teachings of Yeshua which expound Torah. Like the city of Adam or the city of Enoch; every man is a city with a sanctuary in his or her midst. How long shall it be till ye see and hear, O ye city dwellers? Until their cities be wasted without inhabitant, and the houses without man, (for the man is the house) and the land be utterly desolate, (for the man is likewise the land) and the Most High has removed men far away, and there be a great forsaking in the midst of their land. Yet in it shall be a tenth, and it shall return, being burnt: as a terebinth, and as an oak, whose stock remaineth, when they are felled; so the holy seed is the stock thereof, O Israel! :)