Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Interesting, yesterday I found that Jesus have no "dual" nature, that of man, and that of Christ.
Of which I firmly believe.
How would you answer?
J.
What a strange interpretation of creation.Gods creation began in the first century, with Jesus being the first born as scripture clearly states.
And also the account of our Lord' transfiguration.Well as Scripture doesn't explain how the hypostatic union of jesus works, I can only say that jesus is divine and human.
As a man He emptied Himself of His divine privileges to suffer temptation to be a faithful high priest who is touched with the feelings of our infirmities.
But given teh fact He walked on water, rose from the dead, fed 20,000 people with a few fiush and bread, raised teh dead etc., It shows He was also divine in His humanity.
He reads "firstborn" ie, Jesus was a created being"What a strange interpretation of creation.
Gods creation began in the first century, with Jesus being the first born as scripture clearly states.
Colossians 1:15 KJV
[15] Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
Absolutely. Scripture declares that.When you say “God’s creation began in the first century” it sounds to me like you are speaking about the new creation. Is that correct?
Contrary to Roman Catholic doctrine I believe only those who are born of God are His creation. Jesus is the first born of God as scripture declares.What a strange interpretation of creation.
Contrary to Roman Catholic doctrine I believe only those who are born of God are His creation. Jesus is the first born of God as scripture declares.
This all began in the first century.
I think that is contrary to all christian doctrine that believe in the Genesis account of creation.Contrary to Roman Catholic doctrine I believe only those who are born of God are His creation. Jesus is the first born of God as scripture declares.
This all began in the first century.
The creation we are a part of currently began with Jesus in the first century. God created no one prior to Jesus’s birth first century.Okay so are you saying that the first 4000 years before Christ actually came... after... Jesus came to earth?
The creation we are a part of currently began with Jesus in the first century. God created no one prior to Jesus’s birth first century.
even you are not a part of this creation unless you have been born from above.
Wrong. Mary actually asked the angel, "How shall this be seeing I know not a man?"Luke 1:31 . . And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth
a son
That was David talking.... read post #97.This suggests to me that the origin of Jesus is in the womb of his mother. Does it to you?
And also a bit ridiculous. lolI think that is contrary to all christian doctrine that believe in the Genesis account of creation.
Not certain what you are saying here.It doesn't quite square with our understanding of the passage of time though.