Frankly, you are better than this post which shows no capacity for discerning nuance. I did not attack your person, only the foolish idea you were advancing.
Is that supposed to be a homosexual implication? Perhaps you are ignorant of the threads where
@Episkopos and I disputed each other rather passionately?
Did you fall off the Lindsay Clancy crazy bandwagon? As
@Episkopos pointed out,
your definition allows an asserted lie to be taken as evidence. You show again lacking the capacity of discernment. Evidence does not depend on faith. Yet, faith may involve evidence.
Converse. While all squares are rectangles, not all rectangles are squares. Study this well.
It’s said to see our sister in Christ so far from the narrow path.