I guess an agreement must be reached as it pertains to what "you" actually means or what a person means when using the term.
The term "you" is the second person singular or plural verb to be, but a person is what is projected or presented objectively to the world. Any verb to be is a verb. A person is a noun.
When I use the term I am referring to the "entirety of the person."
You're also including a form of the verb to be which has nothing to do with a persona.
This would include the personality, thoughts, as well as arms, legs, and height.
The personality is from the person or persona as is the body which is objectively presented. Thoughts are another matter altogether. There is much evidence pointing to the fact that thoughts originate in the gut, and make their way through the heart before affecting the brain. It is also a quite common self evident fact that one can be aware of their thoughts as well as aware of no thoughts at all. This doesn't negate or affirm one's sense of self. In other words, a sense of self is something one thinks. One doesn't necessarily have to have a sense of self at all with or without thoughts. Simply identifying with them doesn't make it so. It is just begging the question.
I wouldn't say that a person has a physical body as much as the physical body is the person
Therefore you are a body that has an arbitrary identity which the body creates. It isn't real. It's just an arbitrary idea.
No evidence that I'm aware of in our shared reality suggests that there can be a person absent of a body.
I agree. The persona or physical body is what is presented to the world. You are a body. Therefore you do not have a body, and it cannot be yours without contradicting yourself, (e.g. "I am my body" is a contradiction in terms).
Evidence suggests that the PERSONality emanates from and is a product of the body. The brain is after all physical.
Yep. However, if we distinguish conscious awareness from one's personality, then all bets are off as there is no evidence whatsoever to come to this conclusion. Science hasn't got a clue. Therefore, one's consious awareness of who they are cannot be established simply by associating it with a physical body. We base this soley on a sense of it being localized, but that's not always the case. There are plenty of people who don't have that localized phenomenon, nor do they identify with it when they do. Some go completely insane while others aren't bothered by it in the slightest, and actually prefer it to a sense of localized awareness.