Where did Christian Universalism come from? - New or old?

[quietthinker]

Noone knows what you actually believe about Salvation as found as Jesus on The Cross.
Post that Thread.
Ive posted over 100 that deal with that Topic, and about 300 more that deal with much of Paul's Theology.
So...... it would be some kind of interesting for you to to try to explain it. @quietthinker

I believe Jesus is my Saviour. I have peace inside and there is no confusion. Is that difficult to understand or believe?

I know you have a great sense of self importance with all your Topics and all your many dealings with Pauls Theology. It's the self importance that's so odious Behold. There is nothing that draws me to your explanations....they are as sterile and cold as an operating table.

If you do, try not to become False, like Episkopos, and teach that....>"The Cross is not about Forgiveness".
And try not to become false like St Steven and teach that "everyone goes to Heaven"..>>"there is no Hell".

Give it a shot, or just do what you do, and post obtuse, strange little thoughts.. that flow out of your head like hot air out of a pink balloon.

And here you attempt to tell me what I shouldn't do. (aren't the 'thou shalt nots' in that Law which you so vehemently oppose?....so how is it that you employ them so readily?)

 

[Behold]

I believe Jesus is my Saviour.

I asked you to explain the Cross of Christ, as Salvation.

You didnt, because you can't.

So, dont point your self righteous little finger at me, or i'll ask you to explain something else that a 6 yrs old Summer Church Camp Christian can explain, that you can't.


Let me know how you would like to proceed.

 

[quietthinker]

I asked you to explain the Cross of Christ, as Salvation.

You didnt, because you can't.

So, dont point your self righteous little finger at me, or i'll ask you to explain something else that a 6 yrs old Summer Church Camp Christian can explain, that you can't.

Let me know.

I realise your objective is to get into a debate. My observation of your style has me concluding you are not interested in discovery but rather intent on telling the other how wrong they are. I have no interest in playing your unhealthy game.

I have invited you to tell me what you think I believe because of you are constantly objecting to things I don't believe. Soooo, you say in your previous post that you don't know what I believe, I would ask, if you don't know, what are you objecting to?

 

[Behold]

I realise your objective is to get into a debate.

Not at all.
My now realized objective was to show the members what you dont know, and how you will try to defect , to hide it.

So, You can now talk all day long about ""motives and debate"" and rocket science and the price of tea in china....but you can't answer my question, that asked you to explain The Cross of Christ.......as i told you that you can't.

So, that is not a good sign, as anyone who names the Name of Jesus should be able to explain The Cross.
After all, thats what you would have to do, if you had ever tried to witness to an unbeliever, once in your life. @quietthinker

Thats a hint for you, little one.

 

[quietthinker]

Not at all.
My objective was to show the members what you dont know, and how you will try to defect , to hide it.

So, You can now talk all day long about ""motives and debate"" and rocket science and the price of tea in china....but you can't answer my question, that asked you to explain The Cross of Christ.......as i told you that you can't.

So, that is not a good sign, as anyone who names the Name of Jesus should be able to explain The Cross.
After all, thats what you would have to do, if you had ever tried to witness to an unbeliever, once in your life. @quietthinker

I will not jump through your hoops Behold. You assume wrongly. Because your demands are not met does not mean I don't understand.
You build assumptions upon assumptions, the end of which is a tangled mess. Why on Earth would I want to get into your tangled spider's web!

 

[Behold]

You assume wrongly.

I didnt assume you can't explain The Cross of Christ.
I proved it, and you keep proving it, because you can't.
See you there, next time.

 

[quietthinker]

I didnt assume you can't explain The Cross of Christ.
I proved it, and you keep proving it, because you can't.
See you there, next time.

What you have proved Behold, is that you make charges against others you cannot substantiate while projection is your favourite defence as is selectively quoting in an attempt to shift the emphasis.

This brown duck is awake to your style; a style in which you exonerate yourself while dishing out blame (accusations) in various forms.

 

[Behold]

What you have proved Behold, is that you make charges against others you cannot substantiate

It took you all day to come back and finally post something that isn't true?

So, I made no "charge" against you.
See, if the Members read our previous correspondance they will see that i asked you a few times to explain "The Cross of Christ".
You never did even try.......and i told you that is because you can't.
I'll give you some credit......because, at least you didnt "Google" it, and then "cut and paste".
So, i appreciate it. @quietthinker