How so?Where did Christian Universalism come from? - New or old?
The Book of Enoch.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How so?Where did Christian Universalism come from? - New or old?
The Book of Enoch.
Early Christian quotes please with links to primary sources only.Where did Christian Universalism come from? - New or old?
Christian Universalism/Apokatastasis has roots in the early church in the east.
It was a leading theology in the east (Greek-speaking church) and was supported by many of
the Patristic Church Fathers, as I understand it.
"The Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge" by Schaff-Herzog, 1908, volume 12, page 96 German theologian- Philip Schaff, Editor: "In the first five or six centuries of Christianity there were six theological schools, of which four (Alexandria, Antioch, Caesarea, and Edessa, or Nisibis) were Universalist, one (Ephesus) accepted conditional immortality; one (Carthage or Rome) taught endless punishment of the wicked. Other theological schools are mentioned as founded by Universalists, but their actual doctrine on this subject is not known."
The main Patristic supporters of the apokatastasis theory, such as Bardaisan, Clement, Origin, Didymus, St. Anthony, St. Pamphilus Martyr, Methodius, St. Macrina, St. Gregory of Nyssa (and probably the two other Cappadocians), St. Evagrius Ponticus, Diodore of Tarsus, Theodore of Mopsuestia, St. John of Jerusalem, Rufinus, St. Jerome and St. Augustine (at least initially) … Cassian, St. Issac of Nineveh, St. John of Dalyatha, Ps. Dionysius the Areopagite, probably St. Maximus the Confessor, up to John the Scot Eriugena, and many others, grounded their Christian doctrine of apokatastasis first of all in the Bible.
— Ramelli, Christian Doctrine, 11.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is this news to you? What's your view?
Interesting that Christian Universalism is marginalized today.
There are three biblical views of the final judgment:
1) Damnationism
2) Annihilationism
3) Christian Universalism (UR)
All three views are in conflict with each other.
A forever burning hell is in conflict with complete annihilation.
And both are in conflict with ultimate restoration. (UR)
In my view Christian Universalism is the best match for the character of God.
A loving God doesn't toss his kids in a furnace and then blame it on them. IMHO
the burning bush in ExodusIs it, though?
A forever-burning-hell shouldn't imply that the fire's fuel isn't consumed. Nothing in nature suggests that would be the case. That isn't how fire works. It's actually quite strange that the church has come to view it this way.
Rather, a forever-burning-hell should imply that the source of the fuel is unending. And, well... we don't seem to have any shortage of bad people this week.
remind me to avoid that lineI believe in Annihilation, and in a forever-burning hell.
I reckon the people are completely destroyed by the fire. I also reckon that the line to that crematorium is unending.
quotes with links pleaseWhere did Christian Universalism come from? - New or old?
The Book of Enoch.
AIHow so?
Here are just a few quotes by the early church fathers, compiled by Gary Amirault’s diligent work, that discuss their beliefs about punishment and restoration in the afterlife:Early Christian quotes please with links to primary sources only.
It originated in 3rd century with Origen, of Alexandria.Christian Universalism/Apokatastasis has roots in the early church in the east.
It was a leading theology in the east (Greek-speaking church) and was supported by many of
the Patristic Church Fathers, as I understand it.
"The Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge" by Schaff-Herzog, 1908, volume 12, page 96 German theologian- Philip Schaff, Editor: "In the first five or six centuries of Christianity there were six theological schools, of which four (Alexandria, Antioch, Caesarea, and Edessa, or Nisibis) were Universalist, one (Ephesus) accepted conditional immortality; one (Carthage or Rome) taught endless punishment of the wicked. Other theological schools are mentioned as founded by Universalists, but their actual doctrine on this subject is not known."
The main Patristic supporters of the apokatastasis theory, such as Bardaisan, Clement, Origin, Didymus, St. Anthony, St. Pamphilus Martyr, Methodius, St. Macrina, St. Gregory of Nyssa (and probably the two other Cappadocians), St. Evagrius Ponticus, Diodore of Tarsus, Theodore of Mopsuestia, St. John of Jerusalem, Rufinus, St. Jerome and St. Augustine (at least initially) … Cassian, St. Issac of Nineveh, St. John of Dalyatha, Ps. Dionysius the Areopagite, probably St. Maximus the Confessor, up to John the Scot Eriugena, and many others, grounded their Christian doctrine of apokatastasis first of all in the Bible.
— Ramelli, Christian Doctrine, 11.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is this news to you? What's your view?
Interesting that Christian Universalism is marginalized today.
There are three biblical views of the final judgment:
1) Damnationism
2) Annihilationism
3) Christian Universalism (UR)
All three views are in conflict with each other.
A forever burning hell is in conflict with complete annihilation.
And both are in conflict with ultimate restoration. (UR)
In my view Christian Universalism is the best match for the character of God.
A loving God doesn't toss his kids in a furnace and then blame it on them. IMHO
How so?
quotes with links please
I don't think that's right?Where did Christian Universalism come from? - New or old?
The Book of Enoch.
It's interesting but it doesn't contradict what I wrote. Nothing in nature suggests a fire that does not consume.the burning bush in Exodus
"The Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge" by Schaff-Herzog, 1908, volume 12, page 96 German theologian- Philip Schaff, Editor:
LOLPaul the Apostle, defined "universalism" as a = cursed gospel, and those who teach it = the NT states are under a "curse".
Origen died around 254 AD, before the formal split between Greek speaking Eastern Orthodox and Latin speaking Western Orthodox. Both were still considered to be the ONE body of Christ catholic church on earth. His controversial views on 'pre-existence of souls' and 'universal salvation' were only condemned by Emperor Justinian and the Second Council of Constantinople in 553 AD. So actually, it was only the EASTERN Orthodox church who posthumously condemned by later church councils, notably in the 6th century, long after his death in 254 AD. Origen was never formally excommunicated or "expelled" by a Roman Catholic authority during his lifetime, nor was he ever officially reconciled by the Roman Catholic church.I can always count on you to make idiotic statements like this . . .
Origen was a Church Father who eventually went into heresy with his Universalist views.
The Catholic Church condemned this heresy LONG before your Protestant Fathers even existed.
Do your homework . . .
Totally agree. The PRO TESTAMENT church began in 1517 AD. PROTESTANT being the Church of Rome's attempt to ridicule the movement that lifted bible over TRADITIONS of the Church which ushered in the great APOSTASY.The Catholic Church condemned this heresy LONG before your Protestant Fathers even existed.
The East-West schism took place in the 11th century (1054 AD). There was ONE unified Catholic Church when the 2nd Council of Constantinople took place.Origen died around 254 AD, before the formal split between Greek speaking Eastern Orthodox and Latin speaking Western Orthodox. Both were still considered to be the ONE body of Christ catholic church on earth. His controversial views on 'pre-existence of souls' and 'universal salvation' were only condemned by Emperor Justinian and the Second Council of Constantinople in 553 AD. So actually, it was only the EASTERN Orthodox church who posthumously condemned by later church councils, notably in the 6th century, long after his death in 254 AD. Origen was never formally excommunicated or "expelled" by a Roman Catholic authority during his lifetime, nor was he ever officially reconciled by the Roman Catholic church.
I know.The East-West schism took place in the 11th century (1054 AD). There was ONE unified Catholic Church when the 2nd Council of Constantinople took place.
Origin's teachings didn't start with him. And they didn't start spreading at the end of the fourth century. They became so widely accepted they became a threat to the EASTERN ORTHODOX catholic church only.By the end of the Fourth century, Origen’s writings were being spread and taught. During this time, it was Epiphanus of Salamis who first publicly railed against Origen’s writings. Later, Theophilus of Alexandria and Jerome and called for his condemnation.
But the only councils were not of the Latin speaking ROMAN church's doing. They were of the Greek speaking EASTERN orthodoxCouncils were convened when there was a crisis, bad teaching or misrepresentation of the truth. There was no TV, no radio, no internet – NO rapid mass communication of ANY kind. Compared to today, bad teachings took a while to spread. Consequently, it also took a while for a Council to be convened.
I don't have time to check all the quotes.Here are just a few quotes by the early church fathers, compiled by Gary Amirault’s diligent work, that discuss their beliefs about punishment and restoration in the afterlife:
...
There are very many in our day, who though not denying the Holy Scriptures, do not believe in endless torments. — Augustine (354-430 A.D.)
...
| By the Sacrifice of Christ all Things are Restored, and Peace is Made Between Earth and Heaven. |
| The Enchiridion — St. Augustine And, of course, the holy angels, taught by God, in the eternal contemplation of whose truth their happiness consists, know how great a number of the human race are to supplement their ranks, and fill up the full tale of their citizenship. Wherefore the apostle says, that "all things are gathered together in one in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth." [1204] The things which are in heaven are gathered together when what was lost therefrom in the fall of the angels is restored from among men; and the things which are on earth are gathered together, when those who are predestined to eternal life are redeemed from their old corruption. And thus, through that single sacrifice in which the Mediator was offered up, the one sacrifice of which the many victims under the law were types, heavenly things are brought into peace with earthly things, and earthly things with heavenly. Wherefore, as the same apostle says: "For it pleased the Father that in Him should all fullness dwell: and, having made peace through the blood of His cross, by Him to reconcile all things to Himself: by Him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven." [1205] By the Sacrifice of Christ all Things are Restored, and Peace is Made Between Earth and Heaven. |
I agree that is true of nature.It's interesting but it doesn't contradict what I wrote. Nothing in nature suggests a fire that does not consume.
" I also reckon that the line to that crematorium is unending."