Interesting, sounds just like the bible.
http://www.wnd.com/2018/07/media-silent-on-genetic-study-defying-evolution/
http://www.wnd.com/2018/07/media-silent-on-genetic-study-defying-evolution/
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Interesting, sounds just like the bible.
http://www.wnd.com/2018/07/media-silent-on-genetic-study-defying-evolution/
Evolutionists could have saved themselves a lot of grief and embarrassment by simply believing the Bible. Even Darwin had serious doubts about his theory, but would not give up his delusions. So it is with evolutionists.He notes, of course, the fact that many species formed contemporaneously with modern human beings. But he adds that data strongly suggests that the mitochondrial DNA clocks of modern humans “formed within the last 6,000 years.” That would be a confirmation of the literal Genesis account of Creation. He also asserts, after studying the data released in the report that suggests many, if not most, of the species “formed within the last 6,000 years.”
Since then, not one major news agency has reported the shocking findings. There has not been any significant attempt at refutation of the research by the evolutionary scientific community. There are no reports of an uproar in the science academy.
Evolutionists could have saved themselves a lot of grief and embarrassment by simply believing the Bible. Even Darwin had serious doubts about his theory, but would not give up his delusions. So it is with evolutionists.
That is the reason I posted the article. to give it some more exposure. Evolutionists = ( religion ) Think they have all the facts on their side. this will burst a lot of bubbles.
Sorry I can't quote an article, but a few years ago I read an article about Darwin shortly be fore he died,
Reportedly said there had to be an intelligent designer. Because of vision, eye sight. it is far to complicated for evolution and that color vision is totally unnecessary. for what ever that is worth.
You are absolutely right. Darwin discussed the amazing nature of the human eye, and could not see (pun intended) how in the world evolution could have brought it about. So it was wilful blindness on his part (and now on the part of his disciples).Reportedly said there had to be an intelligent designer. Because of vision, eye sight.
That is the reason I posted the article. to give it some more exposure. Evolutionists = ( religion ) Think they have all the facts on their side. this will burst a lot of bubbles.
Sorry I can't quote an article, but a few years ago I read an article about Darwin shortly be fore he died,
Reportedly said there had to be an intelligent designer. Because of vision, eye sight. it is far to complicated for evolution and that color vision is totally unnecessary. for what ever that is worth.
I take it you are part of the overseers on this Forum? If so am I allowed to mention other preachers name's?
Are you talking about this thread or a different one ?
NO, I'm not an over seer. My job is to encourage members to get involved in conversations and to post on threads.
Well I mentioned a persons name once and they removed my post, on this forum!
Well I didn't do it. and don't know the circumstances of your post being removed. On the forum page in the welcome new members thread there are a list of rules. If you reread that thread you may find the answer to you question.
good luck.
from your article:
May when Mark Stoeckle from the Rockefeller University in New York and David Thaler at the University of Basel in Switzerland, both evolutionary scientists, published in the Journal of Human Evolution the results of their meticulous and sweeping genetic study of the DNA barcodes of more than 100,000 animal species and humans showing man and all the animals seem to have sprung to life spontaneously no more than 200,000 years ago.
Since then, not one major news agency has reported the shocking findings. There has not been any significant attempt at refutation of the research by the evolutionary scientific community. There are no reports of an uproar in the science academy.
“This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could,” researcher and co-author Thaler told one interviewer.
The first report on the study came in Phys.org, which concluded the findings are “sure to jostle, if not overturn, more than one settled idea about how evolution unfolds.” Yet, even that report buried the lead under the headline: “Sweeping gene survey reveals new facets of evolution.”...
The researchers examined some 5 million gene snapshots, or DNA barcodes, collected from 100,000 animal species by hundreds of researchers around the world and deposited in the U.S. government-run GenBank database....
Nathaniel Jeanson, who holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University in cell and developmental biology and the author of the book “Replacing Darwin,” says, “There’s a great danger to the evolutionary model in this study in ways they don’t quite realize yet.”
He notes, of course, the fact that many species formed contemporaneously with modern human beings. But he adds that data strongly suggests that the mitochondrial DNA clocks of modern humans “formed within the last 6,000 years.” That would be a confirmation of the literal Genesis account of Creation. He also asserts, after studying the data released in the report that suggests many, if not most, of the species “formed within the last 6,000 years.”
I stumbled across a Fella that is quite good with debating Evolutionist's ! you might want to look into His teaching against Evolution.
KENT HOVIND!
from your article:
May when Mark Stoeckle from the Rockefeller University in New York and David Thaler at the University of Basel in Switzerland, both evolutionary scientists, published in the Journal of Human Evolution the results of their meticulous and sweeping genetic study of the DNA barcodes of more than 100,000 animal species and humans showing man and all the animals seem to have sprung to life spontaneously no more than 200,000 years ago.
Since then, not one major news agency has reported the shocking findings. There has not been any significant attempt at refutation of the research by the evolutionary scientific community. There are no reports of an uproar in the science academy.
That's because the study didn't actually show that "man and all the animals sprang to life spontaneously no more than 200,000 years ago." What it showed is that the last common female ancestor of each species lived about 200,000 years ago.