In your opinion, but not supported by any other Scripture.
This is proof we are in Rev 20. After the second coming, there is no more time, sin, death or marriage or procreation.
Of course Scripture supports what John wrote. 1 Corinthians 15 shows 3 times Jesus presents those made alive:
At the Cross, Jesus presented the OT redeemed out of Abraham's bosom to the Father.
At the Second Coming Jesus presents the church glorified.
At the end of the Millennium reign, Jesus presents all of creation.
We are not told the lengths in 1 Corinthians 15 by Paul, but we know it has been almost 2,000 years since the firstfruits. John tells us the length between the Second Coming and the end.
Are you denying your millennium is 2 millennia? Are you hoping yourself, it will last thousands of more years? You have no clue any length of time on earth, because you refuse to accept literal 1,000 year periods.
There is no procreation in the resurrection to Paradise, the world to come. Paradise is heaven. We are on earth. Not just an age. A totally different location as well. The no procreation phenomenon, happened after the OT was resurrected out of death into eternal life. That was your age to come, you so vehemently deny.
There is not even a resurrection mentioned in 1 Corinthians 15:22-28
"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him. And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all."
According to your own judgment, you foist that into the text. What you condemn of others, you do yourself.
Revelation 20 clearly states a resurrection occurs at the beginning of the mentioned 1,000 years and not just that of Christ. Clearly you change Scripture to fit your own bias. I have no opinion nor doctrine. I just point out what Scripture is stating. My opinion is Scripture.
Your opinion adds to Scripture to get it to make sense. You add recapitulation. You add Christ is the only firstfruit. You change the word firstfruits from plural to singular. You claim Revelation 20 has a resurrection at the end, when the resurrection is at the beginning. Given life is a resurrection. Made alive is changed out of Adam's dead flesh into God's permanent living flesh. Those alive on earth will be made alive. Unless you think those alive on earth have to physically die instead of being made alive. That is still adding to Scripture.
When one is given life, it means they lost it at some point, and it returns. Being made alive is out of Adam's dead condition, not strictly a point of resurrection. You are born dead in Adam. You are born alive in Christ. The two births. The first is physical. The second is spiritual. So the first death, and resurrection is physical. The second death is spiritual, and if you die spiritually in the LOF, the spiritual resurrection would be out of the LOF, the second death. You change the physical resurrection into a second (spiritual) resurrection. That destroys the definition of the first resurrection, and calls for a resurrection out of the LOF, before one is even placed in the LOF. Your doctrine changes everything we are taught in Scripture.
Now your mind can only interpret Scripture though your Amil bias. You cannot even see Satan as being loosed a thousand years after the Second Coming. You seem stuck in your Amil thought processes.
I don't foist a resurrection onto 1 Corinthians 15. I just point out there was a resurrection at the Cross per Matthew 27. You call those made alive at the Cross, only Jesus being resurrected. What happened to those made alive at the Cross? They just died again? Nothing could keep them alive? Could it mean there is literally more than the one Amil single resurrection? The soul was still in Adam's dead state waiting to be physically made alive as well as spiritually allowed into Paradise and God's presence. And souls don't procreate. They were given a physical body that was now prohibited from procreation. It was not necessary to fill up Abraham's bosom, nor Paradise. The redemption of Adam's dead condition would take place over the next 2,000 years, one soul at a time entering Paradise physically. 2 Corinthians 5:1.
Those on earth would never literally proceed those who already were made alive, and allowed into Paradise. Even Paul could not enter before those from the OT. So no one is waiting to enter all at one time. Either they are in Paradise or in Adam's dead state still in death, and no one has ever been made alive to this day, if that is the case. No one is currently seated in heavenly places. That is what your insistence with a singular resurrection is stating. Paul clearly states that those made alive will God bring at the Second Coming to meet up with those on earth. But the meeting place is still in the air. The church does not come to earth at that point, and the New Jerusalem does not descend at that point either. Neither is there an Armageddon event at that point. And people are not burned to a crisp at that point. There is no singularity point according to Amil as in Genesis 1:1 at the Second Coming. The Second Coming is part of the order Paul gave concerning being made alive, including all of creation, not just humanity.
Why would Paul use the words "every man in his own order", if there was only one single event?
