Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
100% correct, Rome lost it's strength in the reformation and those that joined together to oppose the blood driven institution.The only reason the RCC isn't still murdering non-Catholics today is because they can no longer get away with it.
Robert Catesby, Guy Fawkes and other conspirators were not acting on behalf of the Church. They were acting on behalf of themselves. Good motives, wrong method. They were trying to put an end to the persecution of Catholics. They were tortured. Falkes slipped of the gallows and broke his neck.100% correct, Rome lost it's strength in the reformation and those that joined together to oppose the blood driven institution.
Wikipedia: English Reformation was a series of events in 16th century England by which the Church of England broke away from the authority of the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church. These events were, in part, associated with the wider process of the European Protestant Reformation, a religious and political movement that affected the practice of Christianity across western and central Europe during this period. Many factors contributed to the process: the decline of feudalism and the rise of nationalism, the rise of the common law, the invention of the printing press and increased circulation of the Bible, and the transmission of new knowledge and ideas among scholars, the upper and middle classes and readers in general. However, the various phases of the English Reformation, which also covered Wales and Ireland, were largely driven by changes in government policy, to which public opinion gradually accommodated itself.
Wikipedia: Gunpowder Plot of 1605, in earlier centuries often called the Gunpowder Treason Plot or the Jesuit Treason, was a failed assassination attempt against King James I of England and VI of Scotland by a group of provincial English Catholics led by Robert Catesby.
His fellow plotters were John Wright, Thomas Wintour, Thomas Percy, Guy Fawkes, Robert Keyes, Thomas Bates, Robert Wintour, Christopher Wright, John Grant, Ambrose Rookwood, Sir Everard Digby and Francis Tresham. Fawkes, who had 10 years of military experience fighting in the Spanish Netherlands in the failed suppression of the Dutch Revolt, was given charge of the explosives.
The plot was revealed to the authorities in an anonymous letter sent to William Parker, 4th Baron Monteagle, on 26 October 1605. During a search of the House of Lords at about midnight on 4 November 1605, Fawkes was discovered guarding 36 barrels of gunpowder—enough to reduce the House of Lords to rubble—and arrested. Most of the conspirators fled from London as they learned of the plot's discovery, trying to enlist support along the way. Several made a stand against the pursuing Sheriff of Worcester and his men at Holbeche House; in the ensuing battle, Catesby was one of those shot and killed. At their trial on 27 January 1606, eight of the survivors, including Fawkes, were convicted and sentenced to be hanged, drawn and quartered.
There is no proof because the Catholic Church has never wanted, no has any desire to replace Israel. Were do you get this crap from? The idiots on you tube?Provide Biblical proof that the catholic church has replaced or will replace Israel as God's chosen people..
YOU posted your observances from the Catechism of the Catholic Church.Catecha what??? Is this a religious term?
YOU posted your observances from the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
That's what "CCC" means in your posts, Einstein.
Unfortunately for YOU - you paraphrased incorrectly . . .
Next time - don't misrepresent the Catechism or I'll be forced to expose you again . . .Ok, and the crow fly's north beyond Montana when the lizard sleeps at night under a brown rock.
You mean www.pope.com?How to find things in the CCC.
Put a topic in the address bar, followed by "catechism" .va
For example, if you want to find out what the CC teaches about merit, key in the address bar "merit catechism .va" or Trinity, key in "trinity catechism .va" Leave out the quotation marks.
This should work with any topic.
Be sure to paste the URL into the forum so everyone can see the full context of the page. Posting snippets misses the point. Matt Slick abuses the catechism by using it incorrectly.
I don't recommend the CCC for inquirors. There are plenty of good apologetic sites that are not so technical. Such as www.catholic.com You will not turn into a zombie.
Next time - don't misrepresent the Catechism or I'll be forced to expose you again . . .
I was precise in my instructions on finding things in the CCC. Have you been told you don't follow instructions very well? Not www.pope.com. Try "pope catechism .va" like I said.You mean www.pope.com?
Ahhh, okay - here's a refresher . . .BOL, I have no idea what you're talking about.
All I did was expose your lie and put you in your place . . .
7.)Forgiveness of sins, salvation, is by faith and works (CCC 2036 CCC 2080 2068)
Ahhh, okay - here's a refresher . . .
In post #297 - YOU stated that the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) indicates that the forgiveness of sins is based on works:
All I did was expose your lie and put you in your place . . .
Show me where the Catechism of the Catholic Church says that salvation is based on works.Ok, but CCC believes salvation is based on works, and salvation is through the forgiveness of sins at the cross only.
Show me where the Catechism of the Catholic Church says that salvation is based on works.
If you can't do that - then you need to retract your statement . . .
Why would you make that ridiculous claim??Oh ok, so you're OSAS?
Why would you make that ridiculous claim??
YOU made a dishonest statement about the Catechism and I am holding you accountable.
How does that make me OSAS??
And I'M not the one who made the false claim.That's what you are and what you preach. Denying that is dishonest.
And I'M not the one who made the false claim.
YOU did - and now you're back-pedaling because you got caught . . .