Already demonstrated with ample Scriptures which were simply ignored.You are more than welcome to explain what you think we have distorted.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Already demonstrated with ample Scriptures which were simply ignored.You are more than welcome to explain what you think we have distorted.
As if that were a bad thing. Have you ever read Finney's works?
I feel a strong sense of conviction every time I read a work of Finney; his works are definitely works of the Holy Spirit.
That's hilarious.
View attachment 5514
Already demonstrated with ample Scriptures which were simply ignored.
A good read is Princeton v. The New Divinity. Finney brought decisional regeneration and that churches need to entertain to the forefront. Many today are STILL deceived by his false gospel and teachings.Quotes from Charles Finney:
assumes that the atonement was a literal payment of a debt, which we have seen does not consist with the nature of the atonement ... It is true, that the atonement, of itself, does not secure the salvation of any one" -Charles G. Finney (Systematic Theology p.217).
It is not founded in Christ's literally suffering the exact penalty of the law for them, and in this sense literally purchasing their justification and eternal salvation [Systematic Theology, 373].
Those who hold that justification by imputed righteousness is a forensic proceeding, take a view of final or ultimate justification, according with their view of the nature of the transaction. With them, faith receives an imputed righteousness, and a judicial justification. The first act of faith, according to them, introduces the sinner into this relation, and obtains for him a perpetual justification. They maintain that after this first act of faith it is impossible for the sinner to come into condemnation; [Systematic Theology, 369].
Finney was an absolute heretic.
Lol! Yes, you've proven your assertion, right?Calvinism is a cult, yes - just like all subgroups within religion.
Lol! Yes, you've proven your assertion, right?
Care to actually substantiate your statement?
Any dictionary huh? Lol!!Yep - check out any dictionary you prefer, James.
Ok so you read The company of Preachers: Wisdom on Preaching Augustine to present. Lots of Charles Finney you got in there . Not all of it you got other guys there .Not only does the preacher cry Stop, but, through the living voice of the preacher, the Spirit cries Stop. The preacher cries, "Turn ye, why will ye die." The Spirit pours the expostulation home with such power, that the sinner turns. Now, in speaking of this change, it is perfectly proper to say, that the Spirit turned him, just as you would say of a man, who had persuaded another to change his mind on the subject of politics, that he had converted him, and brought him over. It is also proper to say that the truth converted him; as in a case when the political sentiments of a man were changed by a certain argument, we should say, that argument brought him over. So also with perfect propriety may we ascribe the change to the living preacher, or to him who had presented the motives; just as we should say of a lawyer who had prevailed in his argument with a jury; he has got his case, he has converted the jury. It is also with the same propriety ascribed to the individual himself whose heart is changed; we should say that he had changed his mind, he has come over, he has repented. Now it is strictly true, and true in the most absolute and highest sense; the act is his own act, the turning is his own turning, while God by the truth has induced him to turn; still it is strictly true that he has turned and has done it himself. Thus you see the sense in which it is the work of God, and also the sense in which it is the sinner's own work. The Spirit of God, by the truth, influences the sinner to change, and in this sense is the efficient cause of the change. But the sinner actually changes, and is therefore himself, in the most proper sense, the author of the change. There are some who, on reading their Bibles, fasten their eyes upon those passages that ascribe the work to the Spirit of God, and seem to overlook those that ascribe it to man, and speak of it as the sinner's own act. When they have quoted Scripture to prove it is the work of God, they seem to think they have proved that it is that in which man is passive, and that it can in no sense be the work of man. Some months since a tract was written, the title of which was, "Regeneration is the effect of Divine Power." The writer goes on to prove that the work is wrought by the Spirit of God, and there he stops. Now it had been just as true, just as philosophical, and just as Scriptural, if he had said, that conversion was the work of man. It was easy to prove that it was the work of God, in the sense in which I have explained it. The writer, therefore, tells the truth, so far as he goes; but he has told only half the truth. For while there is a sense in which it is the work of God, as he has shown, there is also a sense in which it is the work of man, as we have just seen. The very title to this tract is a stumbling block. It tells the truth, but it does not tell the whole truth. And a tract might be written upon this proposition, that "conversion or regeneration is the work of man;" which would be just as true, just as Scriptural, and just as philosophical, as the one to which I have alluded. Thus the writer, in his zeal to recognize and honor God as concerned in this work, by leaving out the fact that a change of heart is the sinner's own act, has left the sinner strongly intrenched, with his weapons in his rebellious hands, stoutly resisting the claims of his Maker, and waiting passively for God to make him a new heart. Thus you see the consistency between the requirement of the text, and the declared fact that God is the author of the new heart. God commands you to do it, expects you to do it, and if it ever is done, you must do it.
As I always say, it's just a Christianized form of "exclusivity religion" which is so characteristic of Luciferian secret societies in their many forms. They all claim to have "special illumination" showing the "true path" and they pridefully consider themselves "special" among the masses of the ignorant who are too stupid or undeserving of the "light" which they feel they've been deemed worthy to receive.With all the Calvinists and quasi-Calvinists posting I think this thread is necessary.
I agree with the widely held belief Calvinism is a cult.
The God of Calvinism does not resemble the God of the Bible.
The salvation of Calvinism is not biblical. God does not create/appoint some salvation and some to damnation with a total rejection of free will.
That is a short and sweet of it. But these two aspects of Christianity are enough to judge it by.