JesusIsFaithful
Well-Known Member
- Feb 24, 2015
- 1,765
- 439
- 83
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
My apologies if this is in fact a true perception of what happened. I cannot comment for someone else. All I will say is that I didn't notice it.
Ok, but now let's address this: Without trying to defend what anyone else said (I don't teach that those without the baptism should automatically be considered "unsaved"), you do believe there were instances in NT times when some had become believers yet had not yet received the baptism in the Holy Spirit, correct?
If you are referring to incidents in the Book of Acts; you need to read those incidents with His discernment, because many tongue speakers refer to those passages as proof that one does not always receive the baptism with the Holy Spirit at their salvation ( which does not really help your cause because that just adds to the illusion that non-tongue speakers are not saved and yes, some tongue speakers, not in this forum, will use that as proof for why believers need to seek to receive the Holy Spirit by a sign of tongues ) See how a slippery slope this discussion can get?
Acts 19:1-7 were not believers in Jesus Christ, but disciples of John the Baptist's. Paul had to tell them about Jesus and then they got water baptized in His name and then they got saved.
Acts 8 is the only one that delays the receiving of the Holy Ghost but you have to discern why Luke was giving all the background on that incident and how they were believing in the "things" Philip was talking about which one could argue as not the same as believing in Him.
The background was that the people of the area had regard Simon highly in fear because he was the one that had afflicted the people with unclean spirits and now Philip was coming along seemingly undoing his work that it caught the attention of Simon's. They were NOW fans of Philip and Simon was in the limelight and had jealousy and bitterness in seeing his work undone supposedly by someone more powerful than him.
Jesus said about those born again, that no one can know when it is done in John 3rd chapter, but the promise is when they believe in Him, they shall be saved as when they are born again as explained to Nicodemus in John 3rd chapter.
So that is why Peter & John had to go down to lay hands on those potential believers because they might give Philip that credit & glory which may be why it was not happening; not to mention that Simon was there which may tempt the new believers into thinking Simon was up to his old tricks again.
You have to ask Him why Philip could not lay hands on them? Why Peter & John had to do this? I believe because of the fanfare and God wanted to lift their sights higher. Indeed, looking at Simon in how his heart was still not right with the Lord shows that his sight needed to be lifted higher when he thought he could buy this power from Peter & john to give the Holy Ghost.
So I believe Acts 8 was the Father drawing them unto the Son to eventually believe in Him, but their sights were on Philip because of how Simon had former infamy in having their attention.
I do point out that it was not reported that they had spoken in tongues because no foreigner was among them for God to manifest tongues towards.
Not every saved believer in Acts received tongues at their salvation. The Ethiopian eunuch did not speak in tongues, thus indicative that tongues were not for private use, being how the Lord was ministering through Philip when the eunuch was alone.