Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
... your argument is not persuasive in light of the evidence.
Evidence? When did you start using EVIDENCE, or even Scripture for that matter?!?
Bobby Jo
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
... your argument is not persuasive in light of the evidence.
Could you please explain your understanding of the 2300 days prophecy ie, where you see it starting and finishing and why.
It is obvious BJ that when the RC system which you hold in such high esteem is exposed as a spurious system of worship no holds are barred to discredit any view that brings this to light.....even from a distance.I guess ignorance is contagious. Everyone is asking about the 2,300, -- is it years, days, half-days. blah, blah, blah.
Perhaps people should start with the TWO Kings of Media and Persia and then arrive to the rest of the Chapter. Because CYRUS NEVER HAD A DUAL MONARCHY. -- And Alexander's empire was broken up between his FIVE GENERALS, which lasted some 40 years until Lysimachus took Antipater's Macedonia and Greece.
Or POSSIBLY, the ANGEL was correct in that the prophecies are NOT ANCIENT. Whoda thunk ...
Bobby Jo
I am not denying AD 538 as a date (1,260 beginning). The point being addressed is the matter of the timing of the uprooting of the three and the how or what took place as fulfillment, not AD 538 (which is solid historically, even as Heiks proves from the primary sources). What happens is that many are attempting to hard-link the two things. Let me come back to this, and go back to the original questions and replies.Yep, 538 is the traditional Adventist focus... And I'm willing to look at alternatives.
Ok, brother, in short, details as needful, so as not to clutter.Could you please explain your understanding of the 2300 days prophecy ie, where you see it starting and finishing and why.
As I see it, is not really relevant, at all. I simply refer you to Scripture and clear cut SoP/ToJ. In short:These two also. If you could give some detail again on where they fit, as you see it
... that when it comes to "blather", YOU WIN! :)It is obvious ...
Ohhh BJ...you incriminate yourself with your cut and paste. May God open your eyes.... that when it comes to "blather", YOU WIN! :)
Now please go away,
Bobby Jo
Thanks for both posts RC....appreciate you taking the time with the detailAs I see it, is not really relevant, at all. I simply refer you to Scripture and clear cut SoP/ToJ. In short:
1,290 of Daniel 12:11 = AD 508 unto AD 1798 (antitype in counterfeit to Jesus)
1,335 of Daniel 12:12 = AD 508 unto AD 1843/44
both of which are tied to timing of the removal of "the daily" (Daniel 8:11,12,13, 11:31, 12:11, etc) and coming to the 'yearly' (Revelation 9:13-15; Leviticus 16 & 23, etc), see:
Dan 12:11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
Dan 12:12 Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.
Dan 12:13 But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.
These are not future, and not to be counted again. Notice the confirmation, by:
"... "And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things? And He said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days." {TM 115.1}
It was the Lion of the tribe of Judah who unsealed the book and gave to John the revelation of what should be in these last days. {TM 115.2}
Daniel stood in his lot to bear his testimony which was sealed until the time of the end, when the first angel's message should be proclaimed to our world. ..." - Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers (1923); pages 115.1 - 115.3
The first Angels message went forward in AD 1842, as is confirmed by.
"... In these cities the message of the first angel went with great power in 1842 and 1843 ..." - Counsels on Health (1923), page 547.2I have a lot more detail on this. A few more excepts from my studies, based upon questions that were asked of me as I ministered at AFmin:
"... the chart [1843] contains many prophetic periods – but which ones (plural) end in 1844?”The specific words “prophetic periods” deal with a very Biblical rule:
Evidence cited:
[1] Spiritual Gifts, pages 133-140.
[2] Early Writings, pages 232-237, 243-44.
[3] The Great Controversy (1888), pages 456-457."
The AD 1798 date has two witnesses:
As I prayed about this and thought on it, I was led back to the original 1843 and 1850 charts, of which replicas were given to me by my sisters. Once I studied more closely the 1843 chart, the true second witness leapt out at me, and it had been on the 1843 chart the whole time! As I considered this, I needed to confirm through the various pioneers which had gave rise to the chart.
[1] Daniel 7:25, 12:7; Luke 21:24; Revelation 11:2,3, 12:6,14, 13:5 – the 1,260 [42 months or time, times, and half/dividing a time]
[2] Daniel 8:11, 11:31, 12:11 – the 1,290
The AD 1843/44 date has two, [even three] witnesses:
[1] Daniel 8:13-14,26 – the 2,300Herein is the answer to the statements and questions concerning the “prophetic periods” that ended in AD 1843/44:
[2] Daniel 12:11,12 – the 1,335
[3] Revelation 9:15, 10:6, 14:6-7; Leviticus 23:27-32; 1 Kings 8:2 KJB, the “hour”, “day”, “month” and “year”. The “hour” of His Judgment, the “day” of Atonement, aka the 10th “day”, of the “seventh” month, Ethanim; in the Year, when “time” would be no longer.
[1] The 1,335 and the [2] 2,300 are the true “prophetic periods” [plural] that ended in AD 1843/1844 [7th month movement, which included both disappointments, and the re-adjustment of the dates].Please notice at the bottom of the 1843 Chart is the numbers:
See the Millerite 1843 Chart, and please take careful notice that the Chart reveals two prophetic periods [2,300 and the 1,335 [bottom of the chart] -
[1] - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Millerite_1843_chart.jpg
[2] - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Millerite_1843_chart_2.jpg
[1]Please notice at the top of the 1843 Chart, the other prophecy reaching to 1843:
508 [AD]
1335 [Day/Years]
---------------------
1843 [AD]
[2]Yet this was all before the disappointment before the Great Disappointment of AD 1844. Thus we have 2 true Prophetic Periods, which ended in AD 1844.
2300 [Day/Years]
457 [BC]
---------------------
1843 [AD]
I can confirm this with many SoP/ToJ and pioneer quotations. I can give them in very brief or in full if you so desire.
PS - I will include the PDF study for you, see attachment. You can also Download it here - http://sdamaranathachurch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/1335.pdf
You are most welcome brother. Anytime, really. If you have any more questions that we can look at together, I do not mind, as I love Bible study with my brothers/sisters, who love the word of God.Thanks for both posts RC....appreciate you taking the time with the detail
Ohhh BJ...you incriminate yourself with your cut and paste. May God open your eyes.
I am only going to ask this once, and in charity (1 Cor. 13). Please refrain from such comments in this thread, as they are not germane to the OP topic. I am asking you, please. Please, stick to the OP topic. If you desire to show someone in error about anything pertaining to the OP, prove this from scripture.... from the blind man ...
Bobby Jo
Okay. I have an open mind regarding scripture, and I couldn't think of any event that was more significant than 538, except perhaps for 533-1793... The ratifying of the two laws.. Justinian and Napoleon.I am not denying AD 538 as a date (1,260 beginning). The point being addressed is the matter of the timing of the uprooting of the three and the how or what took place as fulfillment, not AD 538 (which is solid historically, even as Heiks proves from the primary sources). What happens is that many are attempting to hard-link the two things. Let me come back to this, and go back to the original questions and replies.
Which I wouldn't really take issue with (533 - 1793) except nowhere in the SoP/ToJ is that range specifically mentioned, as opposed to 538-1798.Okay. I have an open mind regarding scripture, and I couldn't think of any event that was more significant than 538, except perhaps for 533-1793... The ratifying of the two laws.. Justinian and Napoleon.
So okay, we have traditional taught that the goods were the final of the three, but even they persisted I little and returned to Rome later...I have wondered about that, but never had the time to look for an alternative.
The issue that H. Heiks (and S. Bohr, myself and others, etc) addresses, is this exactly. It is dealing with something specific, not so much the outward appearance of 'kingdom' (for instance the fact that vestiges of armies remain, doesn't mean that a functioning Kingdom still existed). If I may, have you considered these works (already mentioned)? If not, I might be able to hand type some of the material for you to consider....So okay, we have traditional taught that the goods were the final of the three, but even they persisted I little and returned to Rome later...I have wondered about that, but never had the time to look for an alternative.
I am a newbie here, my name is Oseas (Hosea), I am from Joinville-Brazil-I like to study prophecies and to decipher the deep enigmas of the Word of God. I my understand we are living in the time of Apocalypse, we are living in the last times, and many prophecies are being fulfilled and many will be fulfilled in the presente time, like those written in Daniel 12 and Revelation 12, for instance, that are being commented here.
May the LORD God bless us
I have read Steven Bohr's material yes. I am very comfortable with the 539-1798 time period...I am interested in your (correct) observation that it was but a presumption toThe issue that H. Heiks (and S. Bohr, myself and others, etc) addresses, is this exactly. It is dealing with something specific, not so much the outward appearance of 'kingdom' (for instance the fact that vestiges of armies remain, doesn't mean that a functioning Kingdom still existed). If I may, have you considered these works (already mentioned)? If not, I might be able to hand type some of the material for you to consider.
Sorry about the spelling in my post you quoted... You seem to have understand it nevertheless. Well done.The issue that H. Heiks (and S. Bohr, myself and others, etc) addresses, is this exactly. It is dealing with something specific, not so much the outward appearance of 'kingdom' (for instance the fact that vestiges of armies remain, doesn't mean that a functioning Kingdom still existed). If I may, have you considered these works (already mentioned)? If not, I might be able to hand type some of the material for you to consider.