Eternally Grateful
Well-Known Member
Caveat Emptor ("Let the buyer beware")
I do accept all of Scripture. But with a realistic view.
I don't buy the false aggrandizing of it beyond its value.
And I consider that aggrandizing to be Bibliolatry.
(worship of the book, rather than the author)
Consider this:
- We don't have the original autographs (manuscripts)
- The copies, of copies, of copies we do have are incomplete fragments.
- The manuscript fragments are loaded with textual variants.
- Textual criticism is required to give us our best guess as to what the originals said.
- One of three different methods of Textual criticism were used. Which one is right?
- Translators applied their own doctrinal bias. Of their own,
or that dictated by the Church/State politics.
- Modern translations add their own level of bias.
Are these the scriptures that you accept as inerrant?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Could you actually address the issue in my post?
St. SteVen said:
Even humans are HUMANE enough to have laws against cruel and unusual punishment.
A forever burning hell with no hope of escape is off the charts in terms of pointless, sadistic, and cruel punishment.
Worse than any despot in human history. Makes the holocaust look like a Sunday School picnic.
But you are happy to lay that at God's doorstep. (for shame)
/
This would be true IF God did Not buy a way out..
he paid it with his own blood. By suffering the most horrific form of capitol punishment mankind has ever fathomed.
And not only this, He suffered a separation from the father for the first time in eternity. You and I can not fathom what that was like. But I know this. And externality in hell will not come close to the pain and suffering our savior felt.
They had a chance to get out. God gave them every opportunity to be saved, even by his creation.
They rejected him, he did not reject them..
Last edited: