QUOTE (Wakka @ Apr 7 2009, 12:21 AM)
index.php?act=findpost&pid=71988
Oh boy here we go again. This forum is generally split into two categories. One group that believes that the act of speaking in tongues is more than "language" and the other that is against it. The later group scares off the first, I noticed that upon observation.I fall in to the category of that first group. White Knuckle, I want you to read 1 Corinthians chapter 14. Read it carefully and examine the literal Greek translations for yourself. Jag and Kriss as well as I are here to give you advice and a sense of direction. The only person you can truly trust is God. So I beg you to pray to God for answers if you ever need help interpreting text.Since everyone gave their 2 ¢, I might as well.
The gift of tongues has four functions:1. Tongues for personal edification (1 Cor. 14.4)This is the supernatural language the Holy Spirit prays through us that we can use to pray hour after hour as we desire.1 Cor. 14:2: "One who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men, but to God; for no one understands, but in his spirit he speaks mysteries."The gift of tongues mentioned here is obviously different from the one manifested on the day of Pentecost - for this gift is not to "speak to men but to God" and no-one can understand what the speaker is saying.1 Cor. 14:4: "One who speaks in a tongue edifies himself"The gift of tongues enables a believer to build himself up spiritually.
2. Tongues for interpretation (1 Cor. 14:5)This manifestation of tongues is normally presented in a public assembly, accompanies by interpretation by the same or another person.1 Cor. 14:26, 27: "What is the outcome then, brethren? When you assemble, each one has a psalm, has a teaching, has a revelation, has a tongue, has an interpretation. Let all things be done for edification. If anyone speaks in a tongue, it should be by two or at the most three, and each in turn, and let one interpret;"Not more than two or three should speak in tongues in a meeting of the church, but each "tongue" must be interpreted. "Interpretation" is not the same as "translation". Translation is "word for word". Interpretation is "expressing the thought in one's own words".
3. Tongues of deep intercession groaning (Rom. 8:26) This diversification of tongues empowers the believers to stand in the gap for their own lives, their families, their church, their city, their nation, etc. God may also call them to intercede for someone or for some situation that is totally unknown to them.
4. Tongues as a sign to the unbeliever (1 Cor. 14:22)This is the phenomenon that took place on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:4-11). It occurs when the Holy Spirit transcends the intellect and all language barriers by empowering a believer to preach, teach, or testify about Christ in some language of men of which the believer himself has no knowledge.Acts 2:4,7,11: "They were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit was giving them utterance....... And the Jews from every nation marveled saying....`We hear them in our own tongues speaking of the mighty deeds of God.'"The first time that believers were filled with the Holy Spirit, they ALL spoke in tongues. The "tongues" were languages that others understood immediately. So there was no need for the gift of interpretation.Notice also in verse 4 that it was the persons themselves who began to speak in tongues and not the Holy Spirit. The Spirit did not move their tongues. The Spirit only gave them utterance. They spoke themselves.In no gift, does the Holy Spirit take away freedom of choice from us. In fact, the fruit of the Spirit is "self-control" (Gal.5:23). Only demon-possessed people lose control of themselves. One who is filled with the Spirit will have more control over himself than anyone else. "The spirit of the prophets is subject to the control of the prophets"(1 Cor.14:32).Revert back to this massive post of mine if you need anymore insight: [url="http://www.christianityboard.com/index.php?showtopic=6923&view=findpost&p=48327]http://www.christianityboard.com/index.php...ost&p=48327[/url]
Nice presentation, Wakka. There is much confusion in the Holy Spirit field. It took a lot for God to get Peter to go to a Gentiles house, but when he did go to Cornelius's house in Acts 10, those who went with Peter were amazed that the Gentiles also received the gift of the Holy Spirit and they knew this because they people there spoke in tongues. Compare this with Acts 8. After Phillip had preached and brought healing and great joy, something was still missing. Peter and John went down and it says then the people of Samaria "received the Holy Ghost." And then, Simon (the sorcerer) saw something - he must have seen the manifestations of the Spirit because he then wanted to buy the power so that he could lay hands on anybody he wanted to so they too could receive. The point is, in the early Church it was common to receive into manifestation speaking in tongues. When a new believer didn't, then someone helped them, like Paul did in acts 19. And in I Corinthians chapter 14, which you so wisely encouraged us to read, Paul said to "forbid not to speak with tongues."One last thing. Jordon, the great apostle Paul said he spoke in tongues more then ye all. If he thought it was that important, then why would you think that it is the least important?