Looking at it this way, that would mean nothing in the Bible is for us today. The book of John was address to certain people of that time, so does that mean John 3:16 no longer applies today? Think about what you're saying here. What Paul taught in his letters was not intended for his audience only. Paul references the church in Ephesians 5:22-32. Not just the church in Ephesus. The body of Christ. There's no reason to think that Paul would not have written things that were applicable to the overall body of Christ to the Ephesians.
I never said — nor have I ever implied — that nothing in the Bible applies to us today. There are universal principles all throughout Scripture that still stand. Saying that the Bride of Christ was a first‑century reality doesn’t mean the rest of the Bible becomes useless. That’s simply not what I believe.
What I am saying is this:
Certain passages had a specific audience, covenant moment, and historical context.
That includes the teachings about the Bride and the sealing that belonged to that generation Jesus spoke to.
But that doesn’t erase the universal truths we still live by — like John 3:16. The problem is that many people quote John 3:16 while also preaching that God hates the world and that Jesus is coming back to destroy it. That’s a contradiction they never address.
So yes, you’re right that Paul taught things that apply broadly to the body of Christ. But that doesn’t change the fact that some parts of his letters were written to a specific people facing a specific prophetic moment. Both can be true at the same time.
You’re pointing out a double‑edged tension, and I get that. But acknowledging context doesn’t make Scripture less meaningful — it actually makes it more accurate and more consistent.
The Bible is useful for building up the spiritual man or woman but not to become spiritually prideful over people or anything like that, but to abide more in the Spirit of Christ if anything.