So what is the Gospel strictly according to Scripture?i mean studying the Bible through the lens of what it says...
What about the deity of Christ strictly according to Scripture?
And is there a connection between the two according to Scripture?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So what is the Gospel strictly according to Scripture?i mean studying the Bible through the lens of what it says...
Our time, all of it, belongs to God, sister! Using it properly is, I believe, essential to our stewardship here. What, if anything, will a poor steward inherit? What will he have when for him there is no more time?
I read and study my three Bibles, but I also both listen and talk to God as well as worship Him. This for me is the eating of His flesh and the drinking of His blood! It has been a daily thing with me for many years. I have standard routines mixed or in addition to more irregular [or led by the Spirit] activities during my morning sessions.
I study the Bible in several ways, but never do I attempt to study without also contacting God.
Our dear sister @Helen posted recently on this forum of praying without ceasing and rejoicing in the Lord always. Perhaps she will show up on this thread before long to share some of her experience with God.
I have a Strong's Concordance that I keep next to me when studying...I also use the cross references especially on verses that have a larger impact in context than others.There are many threads that delve into what the Bible says in its original language (OT Hebrew, NT Greek). English has never been my strong suit, let alone foreign languages of any kind and this got me wondering. I rely on English translations as an English speaking person. Is it even fair to say those who reference the original languages are merely reading? I think not.
I recall in a Study Bible class the Pastor got up to get a reference on what a certain word meant in the original language. For some reason, many of the crowd bemoaned him doing this. However, I supported his efforts saying, "This is not called Bible Read but Bible Study."
My guess is very few who post in this forum would say they only read but do not study the Bible. Thoughts?
What does it matter what others do? You do what you feel persuaded you should do!There are many threads that delve into what the Bible says in its original language (OT Hebrew, NT Greek). English has never been my strong suit, let alone foreign languages of any kind and this got me wondering. I rely on English translations as an English speaking person. Is it even fair to say those who reference the original languages are merely reading? I think not.
I recall in a Study Bible class the Pastor got up to get a reference on what a certain word meant in the original language. For some reason, many of the crowd bemoaned him doing this. However, I supported his efforts saying, "This is not called Bible Read but Bible Study."
My guess is very few who post in this forum would say they only read but do not study the Bible. Thoughts?
The Blue Letter Bible iPhone app has a handy Interlinear feature that gives the Hebrew/Greek text along with parsing information.I have a Strong's Concordance that I keep next to me when studying...I also use the cross references especially on verses that have a larger impact in context than others.
Another non-value added post. If you don’t want to have a conversation about this curiosity, then feel free to post in other threads.What does it matter what others do? You do what you feel persuaded you should do!
There are many threads that delve into what the Bible says in its original language (OT Hebrew, NT Greek). English has never been my strong suit, let alone foreign languages of any kind and this got me wondering. I rely on English translations as an English speaking person. Is it even fair to say those who reference the original languages are merely reading? I think not.
I recall in a Study Bible class the Pastor got up to get a reference on what a certain word meant in the original language. For some reason, many of the crowd bemoaned him doing this. However, I supported his efforts saying, "This is not called Bible Read but Bible Study."
My guess is very few who post in this forum would say they only read but do not study the Bible. Thoughts?
Those couple of hundred declensions are no joke! People who can actually retain that - Greek readers - Like wow!!
Scripture4all.org is an interlinear with Strongs and Syntax for the TR and W&H. The Apostolic Polyglot has the same thing but for the LXX and the Majority Manuscript.
I dig into all of this as best as I'm am able. Just the same, don't disregard just reading chapters. I've gotten so much out of reading through and through and through the different parts. Repetition enhances recall, and as you are reading here, you will more likely think of what you read there.
It's not even enough to study the Bible, just like it isn't enough to read the Bible. There are plenty of people who study the Bible, but they don't study it honestly. And by "study it honestly", i mean studying the Bible through the lens of what it says and not what some denomination, theologian, "church father", or scholar said.
I see it differently, always an unwelcome distraction to God's word. I prefer to study different English translations, including comparing thought to literal type translations. If I hear one more invocation of Agápe, I fear the result.
No,I don’t study the Bible , I read the Bible and wait for God to show me something . Some days He does, and some days He doesn’t. Study for studies sake is information , good information , but it’s not LIFE.
Life through the Bible can only come via the breath of the Holy Spirit on the printed word.
I've attempted it as well a few times, and the thing is, unless you intend on continuing to read Greek for the rest of your life, it becomes very hard to retain it all in your memory. That's why I have just chosen to leave it alone and focus more on studying the lexicons for the meaning of individual words in their various contexts.
Thanks. I don't lean too heavily on Strongs anymore. I tend to go immediately to Liddell-Scott. But the Apostolic Polyglot thing sounds interesting. I used to use Marsh's LXX, but lately that seems harder to find, so I've been going with someone else (can't remember who now). And I use Greek Bible Online when I want to quote the NT in Koine.
This sounds like good advice, Mark, and I appreciate it. I can't say as I ever get motivated to just read Chapters anymore on my own, but one thing that helped me a little was when @Mayflower was posted those Daily Bible Verse threads. That would usually lead me to look at an entire Chapter for context, so in a way it led me to reading Chapters.
Anyway, thanks for the heads up. That's very kind of you.
I miss DailyBibleVerse. I posted them elsewhere, but just feels weird posting them places he was on. This is where he posted the videos. Plus I've not had a lot of time either or can actually listen to it. I normally read them.
It seems that those who developed good study habits early on in general, are more apt to study the bible...comparing scripture to scripture, looking up the different meanings" of the Greek and Hebrew...and Aramaic.
@Heart2Soul Strong's ref.s are useful........I have a Strong's Concordance that I keep next to me when studying...I also use the cross references especially on verses that have a larger impact in context than others.
@Heart2Soul Yes, Strong's numbers are really useful in Bible study...I have a Strong's Concordance that I keep next to me when studying...I also use the cross references especially on verses that have a larger impact in context than others.