Shabbat shalom, Marcus. (And I DO mean have a "Sabbath of peace," bro’.)
Marcus O'Reillius said:
Well it's very simple to disagree with you Retro because your fanciful answers are always constrained within a limited box of your own thinking.
This earth is done away with entirely. Whatever the new earth is, it is beyond your meager comprehension so as to fit a structure 1500 miles long, wide, and high, which does match the cubic dimensions for the Most Holy Place in the original Tent of Meeting, without having to go through your geometric gymnastics.
By setting your creation on the earth with its present rules for physics, you are forced to come up with all kinds of simple engineering problems. You cannot pressurize the whole and have it be uniform in pressure throughout so that a single, simple light source can light it all.
You take a human perspective and force God to create within that earthly box and because of your limiting constraints of being on this small planet, you create problems you haven't even discovered, oh ye who teaches teachers and is the only one who spells Hebrew correctly.
Bitterness does not become you, my brother!
First of all, I can see that much of your denial is simply a matter of perspective. The Scriptures
NOWHERE says that “this earth is done away with entirely.” But then, we
ALL have our “limited boxes of our own thinking” that “constrain” our “fanciful answers," don’t we?
Let’s play a little game:
Let’s assume that you’re correct and that the New Jerusalem is going to be a
HUGE cube 1500 miles x 1500 miles x 1500 miles, patterned after the Holy of Holies. How large would the New Earth have to be so that it has similar dimensional perspective to the Holy of Holies on
THIS earth?
I’m going to take the dimensions for the Tent’s Holy of Holies for
THIS earth’s size (because it
WAS sitting on this earth in its time) and convert it to that for the New Jerusalem:
I’ll start with your measurements of "15 cubits cubed” and use the 18-inch cubit to start. Thus, 15 cubits x 18 inches per cubit / 12 inches per foot = 22.5 feet cubed. (If we use the 21-inch Royal Cubit that was often used in Egypt, it would be 26.25 feet.) This would be 0.004261364 miles long, wide, and high (... or 0.004971591 miles for the Royal Cubit). Now, we stick this value into a ratio of proportions:
0.004261364 miles : 24902 miles :: 1500 miles : X miles.
Thus, the formula would be: X = 24902 x 1500 / 0.004261364 miles = 8,765,504,000 miles! Therefore, to have the same perspective as that of the Holy of Holies on this earth, the New Earth would have to have a circumference of 8.765504
BILLION miles! Even if we used the Royal Cubit, we’re still talking about a planet with 7.513289143
BILLION miles! That is, 7,513,289,143 miles! Written out, that’s "seven
BILLION five hundred thirteen million, two hundred eighty-nine thousand, one hundred forty-three miles!" Is
THAT what you’re saying? Should we calculate the gravitational pull on such a planet? Even the
SUN only has a 2.719876-million-mile circumference! We’re talking about a circumference that is 2,762 times
BIGGER than that of the sun at best (that is, using the Royal Cubit)! When one remembers from their science classes that the sun in 93 million miles away from the earth, this New Earth would be bigger than the sphere marked out from the sun that uses our radius to earth! In fact, it would be 7513289143 / 534335740 = 14 times bigger! It would be big enough to encompass the all the revolutions of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, the asteroid belt, Jupiter, and Saturn!
Anyway, that seems to me to be a
MUCH BIGGER PROBLEM (pun intended) than my “geometric gymnastics!"
Let’s set that aside for the moment and look at your statement here (which I found much more interesting, btw):
You said, "
By setting your creation on the earth with its present rules for physics, you are forced to come up with all kinds of simple engineering problems. You cannot pressurize the whole and have it be uniform in pressure throughout so that a single, simple light source can light it all."
Consider first that
GOD HIMSELF “set" His Creation of our planet to those “present rules for physics,” and
HE called them “very good” (Gen. 1:31). Why should He have to remake the entire Universe and change all the “rules for physics” when He’s done so well with this one? I’m not “limiting God” to anything; He can do as He wish (obviously), but does He really need to do this because
WE don’t understand the words within His explanation for things? because
WE don’t understand all there is to know about prophecy? because
WE can’t yet see the big picture of what He will do for us in the future?
We are given just a handful of information about the New Jerusalem within the Scriptures. Neither you nor I know everything there is to know about such a city. We don’t know all the plumbing and the arrangement of mirrors and reflective surfaces and clear gems within the city; we don’t know if buildings will be shielded from the light of God as our present buildings are shielded from the sun; we don’t know if our future homes will have skylights, as many of our homes do now; we don’t know about all the transportation methods that might be used in such a city (although I know that many feel we’ll just be able to go <poof!> through walls or transport ourselves instantly anywhere we choose to go), but God didn’t
SHOW us any of that! He was just giving us a brief insight of what we can expect! All we can do is to do our best to understand the puzzle pieces we
DO have! I believe that God, through His Ruach haQodesh (His Holy Spirit), has given me a way to understand all the clues I see in the Scriptures, not only in Revelation 21 and 22, but everywhere else the Bible talks about the New Jerusalem. Should I not
HONOR HIM by sharing that information? I will continue to do so, with or without your permission or approval.
You said, "
You cannot pressurize the whole and have it be uniform in pressure throughout so that a single, simple light source can light it all,” but I’m having trouble understanding your reasoning here. How does pressurizing the atmospheres of the various levels affect how they are lighted? Are you thinking of solid,
OPAQUE walls used to pressurize the various levels of the city? How does one affect the other? The 12 gemstones mentioned for the foundations are at worst translucent, and most can be transparent. They may have various hues and colors, but they will transmit most of the light. Besides, we are talking about a light source brighter than that of the sun. However God will get it done, it
SHALL be done! Even if the light has to be transmitted through multiple mirrors and reflective surfaces as well as the transparency of the building materials,
NO PART of the city will have need of the sun or the moon or light of a candle, and there will be no night there! (Rev. 22:5) But, again, just because the
CITY has no need for the sun or the moon, that does
NOT mean that the
EARTH won’t have need for them!
Now, I
SAID “pressurized” several times, but actually a sufficient quantity of air just has to be
CONTAINED on the bottom and the sides within each level to produce a column of air with an air pressure comparable to the earth’s surface. The earth’s gravitational pull will do the rest.
My adult daughter pointed something out to me today: God’s Word must make sense to even the mathematicians. A mathematician should be able to read God’s Word and find sense; he should not be able to find flaws in it, even in the math. The Bible is true, not just for the layman but even for the mathematician. So, when a mathematician discovers truths in God’s Word that others don’t understand, why is it that the non-mathematician must snub the mathematician for the math that the non-mathematician doesn’t understand?