Shalom, Trekson.
Your words: “
Sorry Retro but you didn’t include the first five highlighted words in your original statement. You just said 'terminology was paramount' and my dictionary says paramount means of the highest importance which I took to mean that you were placing your knowledge above the HS or at least at the same level."
Well, I’m not going to argue with you. I apologize for my poor choice of words, but I stand by my amended statement: “WITHIN the leading of the Ruach haQodesh, terminology is paramount."
Your words: “
Because of the great amount of time since the original scriptures were written and the human factor of the translators I just don’t have the same regards towards terminology as you do. I don’t deny its importance but the ‘sense' of what I receive from the HS is more important to me than the actual wording."
But HOW can you even HAVE a “sense” of what you are “receiving from the HS” if you don’t take into consideration the terminology of the Scriptures? Remember:
John 14:23-26
23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.
25 These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you.
26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
KJV
John 15:26-27
26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
27 And ye also shall bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning.
KJV
John 16:13-14
13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
KJV
John 17:12-17
12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.
13 And now come I to thee; and these things I speak in the world, that they might have my joy fulfilled in themselves.
14 I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
15 I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.
KJV
Thus, the Ruach haQodesh USES the Scriptures, bringing all things to our remembrance, as per Yeshua`s words!
Your words: “
I believe heaven is a very large earth-like planet. Everything on earth is a copy of what is in heaven but not everything from heaven is copied to earth. No, there are no scriptures that come out and say that but that is the sense I get. Does it have to 'make‘ sense? Not to me. If you consider God’s omnipresence that acknowledges that God is everywhere at the same time, than the verse of God not being contained is of course true, but when I consider where God dwells, I look at it as ‘His base of operations.' In all your verses about God dwelling in the 'land of Israel,' to answer your question, 'where exactly does God dwell?' The answer is simple. Until the crucifixion of Christ, God 'dwelt‘ in the Holy of Holies! Does that mean He was there 24/7? No, I guess you could consider it His layover spot, where He was there as needed. Of course it is possible that God in the guise of the HS was there 24/7."
So, let me get this straight: You believe that this earth on which we live and its atmosphere is called “earth” and this “very large earth-like planet” with its own atmosphere is called “heaven?” Really?! That is the “sense” you get?! Of course it doesn’t have to make sense! IT DOESN’T!
Let me make this plain: GOD ISN’T “DWELLING"
ANYWHERE!
EVERYWHERE one goes, God is
PRESENT there! Anywhere and everywhere is God’s “base of operations!” God didn’t “dwell” in the Holy of Holies, neither in the Tabernacle nor in the first Temple that S

moh built nor in the second Temple built after the Captivity to which Herod made improvements!
Your words: “
If heaven is a planet, it would have gardens, cities and buildings, etc. The following verse could be about the NJ but it could also be of a heavenly Jerusalem from which the NJ is copied.
Gal. 4:26 – 'But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.'
I don’t think you’re taking into consideration time in general. I think an argument could be given that until Adam & Eve sinned, it could be said that God ‘dwelt' in the garden. From the flood to the building of the tabernacle, we’re not really told where God dwelt although we know, for a time, it was around Melchisadek. Once the tabernacle was built until Christ’s crucifixion, He 'dwelt‘ in the Holy of Holies. From that until the present, he ‘dwells' in the hearts and minds of believers. At some point in the future, heaven and the NJ will come to earth but I’m am not convinced that there will be a 'gap‘ in the heavens where the NJ 'used‘ to be. I would consider that location to be the 'heaven of heavens‘ your 1 Kings 8:27 was referencing and if there are cities and a temple I can certainly imagine a door being there as well as a Mt. Sion.
Psalm 11:4 4 The Lord is in his holy temple, the Lord's throne is in heaven: his eyes behold, his eyelids try, the children of men. KJV
This verse shows me that they knew God has a throne in heaven at the same time as He dwelt in the Holy of Holies here on earth."
Big problems with the above! First, if “heaven” is a CITY, it too would have gardens and buildings, etc. You have nothing in Scripture to support your “heaven is a large planet” theory; there is MUCH in Scripture that supports the “mankind’s PERSPECTIVE of a ‘heaven’ is a large city, the New Jerusalem” theory!
Second, your interpretation of Galatians 4:26 is flawed and pulled out of its context:
Galatians 4:21-31
21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar (Hagar).
25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
27 For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.
28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.
KJV
This passage is contrasting the TWO SONS of Avraham, Yishma’el (Ishmael) and Yitschaq (Isaac)!
Yishma’el:
His mother was a bondslave and Avraham’s concubine.
His mother and he were cast out.
Avraham’s children through Yishma’el went to live in Arabia.
The chief pinnacle (of interest to Israel) was Mount Sinai.
Because he was Avraham’s and Sarah’s human attempt to fulfill God’s prophecy, he was "a child of the flesh."
His children, like he, were “children of the flesh."
Yitschaq:
His mother was a free woman and Avraham’s wife.
His mother and he remained the family of Avraham.
Avraham’s children through Yitschaq came to live in the Land of Isra'el.
The chief pinnacle (of interest to Israel) was Mount Tsiown (Zion) on which Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) was situated.
Because he was literally God’s promised seed, he was “a child of the Spirit."
His children, like he, were “children of promise."
THIS is that verse’s correct interpretation:
Yerushalayim, the one where the disciples, who were children of Isra’el, first met, is above Mount Sinai - not necessarily in height or elevation, but in position and importance! It’s where the NEW covenant was given, as opposed to the old covenant which was given on Mount Sinai! It has NOTHING to do with the New Jerusalem!
Now, I’ve certainly taken time into consideration; however, you’re still under the delusion that God is localized to a particular place!
Isaiah 66:1-2
66 Thus saith the LORD, The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me? and where is the place of my rest?
2 For all those things hath mine hand made, and those things have been, saith the LORD: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word.
KJV
Psalm 139:7-12
7 Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence?
8 If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there.
9 If I take the wings of the morning, and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea;
10 Even there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me.
11 If I say, Surely the darkness shall cover me; even the night shall be light about me.
12 Yea, the darkness hideth not from thee; but the night shineth as the day: the darkness and the light are both alike to thee.
KJV
2 Samuel 7:5-17
5 Go and tell my servant David, Thus saith the LORD, Shalt thou build me an house for me to dwell in?
6 Whereas I have not dwelt in any house since the time that I brought up the children of Israel out of Egypt, even to this day, but have walked in a tent and in a tabernacle.
7 In all the places wherein I have walked with all the children of Israel spake I a word with any of the tribes of Israel, whom I commanded to feed my people Israel, saying, Why build ye not me an house of cedar?
8 Now therefore so shalt thou say unto my servant David, Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I took thee from the sheepcote, from following the sheep, to be ruler over my people, over Israel:
9 And I was with thee whithersoever thou wentest, and have cut off all thine enemies out of thy sight, and have made thee a great name, like unto the name of the great men that are in the earth.
10 Moreover I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime,
11 And as since the time that I commanded judges to be over my people Israel, and have caused thee to rest from all thine enemies. Also the LORD telleth thee that he will make thee an house.
12 And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom.
13 He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever.
14 I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men:
15 But my mercy shall not depart away from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee.
16 And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.
17 According to all these words, and according to all this vision, so did Nathan speak unto David.
KJV
THIS is what the LORD (YHWH) has said! Oh, and by the way, if any version says that God “dwelt” in the Tabernacle or used it as His “dwelling" (as some do in this last passage), the translators need to go back and re-write their version, because that is NOT what the Hebrew says here!
Read more carefully in 1 Kings 8! There, the Temple is recognized as the place where God’s NAME resides, not God Himself! What S

moh haMelekh is saying is that even the loftiest of the lofties cannot contain God!
OT:8064 shaamayim (shaw-mah'-yim); dual of an unused singular shaameh (shaw-meh'); from an unused root meaning to be lofty; the sky (as aloft; the dual perhaps alluding to the visible arch in which the clouds move, as well as to the higher ether where the celestial bodies revolve):
KJV - air, astrologer, heaven (-s).
(Biblesoft's New Exhaustive Strong's Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary. Copyright © 1994, 2003, 2006 Biblesoft, Inc. and International Bible Translators, Inc.)
Also, as an aside, be careful with saying “Mount Sion.” There is not only a “Har Tsiyown,” translated as “Mount Zion,” but there is also a “Har Siy’on,” translated as “Mount Sion.” (See Deut. 4:48.) Only through the Greeks (who didn’t have a letter like the Hebrew “tsadday” any more than we do) did “Tsiyown” become “Sioon,” spelled “sigma-iota-omega-nu.” The KJV distinguished between the two by using a “Z” for the “tsadday."
Lastly, not every word translated as “Temple” means “Temple!” The word was used for where Hannah, Shmu’el’s (Samuel’s) mother, entreated God for a son, LONG before the Temple came along! (See 1 Sam. 1:9.)
Psalm 11 4
4 YHWH bheeykhal qaadshow YHWH bashaamayim kic’ow `eeynaayv yechzuw `af`apaayv yiVchanuw bneey aadaam:
JPS Hebrew-English Tanakh
4 YHWH = 4 YaHuWH / ADONAI / the-LORD
bheeykhal = in-the-ability
qaadshow = of-His-holiness
YHWH = YaHuWH / ADONAI / the-LORD
bashaamayim = in-the-skies
kic’ow = His-covered-(seat)/throne
`eeynaayv = His-eyes
yechzuw = gaze
`af`apaayv = His-eyelids
yiVchanuw = contemplate
bneey = (the)-children
aadaam: = of-men/of-Adam:
And, although it calls the skies His “covered seat” or His “throne,” this is within the parameters of Isaiah 66:1 above. If the “expanse,” called “
hashaamayim” in Hebrew, has no limit to how far it may expand, that would include the farthest reaches of space! ALL of “
hashaamayim,” including “
shaameey hashaamayim,” is God’s “throne!"
Your words: “
Ever heard of the Pegasus? I don’t doubt your thoughts on the NJ but that is in the future, not now. If it’s just sitting out there in space where does the water come from and where does it go? The picture we are given doesn’t seem to apply to a space located city. One thing the bible never mentions in regards to the NJ is where are the angels? Where do they live? Would we or God even need them anymore? Perhaps because of their faithful service they inherit the planet of heaven as their home. Who knows! While I enjoy discussing this topic, I don’t think, because of all the unknowns, that it’s worth being contentious over. I can’t “prove” what I believe to be true anymore than we can “prove” to an atheist, the existence of God! It’s just something I believe by faith and if it’s untrue, it’s no big deal, I’m sure I’ll be just as happy in the presence of God, no matter where it is."
Seriously?! “Pegasus?!” PLEASE don’t resort to using Greek and Roman mythology to explain the Scriptures, as the Jews and later the third/fourth-century Christians did!
Regarding the New Jerusalem’s water, remember that this city, being under construction in outer space and having its twelve gates closed, is a CLOSED SYSTEM! Also remember that this city is 1,500 miles long, wide, and high! The water is simply given a water cycle to follow, much as it does on the surface of the earth. Y’know, the water vapor in the sky condenses into clouds, the clouds rain and fill the rivers and streams with run-off water, the water is collected in lakes, seas, and oceans, it evaporates and becomes the water vapor in the skies again. Something similar probably occurs within the walls of the New Jerusalem. The water is recycled, much as we try to do in our modern space vehicles, like the ISS.
Finally, what are “angels” if not God’s “messengers?” That’s what “
aggeloi” means in Greek! It’s a whole other discussion, but many of the instances of “angels” in Scripture, I believe, are simply those who are “HUMAN messengers.” WILL they be needed any more? Not when the following occurs:
Jeremiah 31:33-34
33
But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD; for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
KJV
Hebrews 8:10-12
10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.
12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
KJV
Instead, we have this info:
Revelation 22:3-4
3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him:
4 And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.
KJV
We won’t need to be His messengers any longer; instead, we will just be His servants.