Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Your argument is with the apostles.
Isaiah isn't saying what you say he is saying. He isn't saying, as you suppose, that the Child IS the almighty God. Isaiah is not telling us what he is, he is telling us what he does.
Look again, it doesn't say "he shall be called"; rather it says, "his name shall be called." In the Bible, a person's "name" is his role, status, quality or characteristic. A child will be born and that child will grow up to rule. The government will rest on his shoulders. That isn't who he is, that is what he does. His name, his role will be "wonderful counselor" his name, his role will be "mighty God," his name, his role will be "Eternal Father", his name, his role will be "Prince of peace."
Isaiah is not saying, as you suppose, "the child will be the Eternal Father". Rather Isaiah is saying that the child will rule his government as one appointed and authorize to act for the Eternal Father.
Stop your lies. I have no reason to listen to you at all. What would it even mean for Him to do God? Is that like playing God? What nonsense. What about the other scriptures I referenced? And there are plenty more. Nothing to say about those?Isaiah isn't saying what you say he is saying. He isn't saying, as you suppose, that the Child IS the almighty God. Isaiah is not telling us what he is, he is telling us what he does.
Your argument is with the apostles.
Whaa!No, I don't. The Divinity of Jesus did not come from the Bible; it came from the Catholic Church. The Apostles taught that Jesus is the image of God, the exegesis of God, the revelation of God, the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature. But Jesus was a man, not a divinity.
Well, this is your thread. I didn't want to derail it, but since you commented I guess you approve. We talked about Isaiah 9:6, where Isaiah says what the child will do, not what he is. Colossians 2:9 is mistranslated.I can't fathom how someone who calls himself a Christian could deny the deity of Jesus Christ. Scripture repeatedly teaches that Jesus is God.
Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Colossians 2:6 As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him: 7 Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving. 8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. 9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Jesus is God. You need to acknowledge this.
I agree. The truth is right there in scripture. Thomas calls him "my Lord and My God." Does that make Jesus diety? I don't think so.The truth is right there in scripture plain as day.
John 20:27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. 28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.
See how this works? We have gone from a fruitful exchange of ideas to a heretic hunt. And isn't it convenient for you that we disagree on your view of the Millennium? What a coincidence.Not so! Quite the opposite. You are fighting with God and God's Word. This is actually blasphemy as well. You are attacking the character of God. This is what the cults do. Are you a JW or a Mormon?
You are blaspheming!
Isaiah doesn't say the child IS "Mighty God" Isaiah says that his name shall be called "mighty God." And I explained the meaning of "name".This child is "the mighty God"! What does this child do in your opinion?
To you, everything I say is gobbledygook. What else is new? You disagree with me, for what reason you can't say. So you insult me. I understand this spirit.You are talking gobbledygook.
I'm surprised to hear this coming from a Christian. How many times did Jesus say something similar to the verse below?Stop your lies. I have no reason to listen to you at all. What would it even mean for Him to do God? Is that like playing God? What nonsense. What about the other scriptures I referenced? And there are plenty more. Nothing to say about those?
Again, Jeremiah refers to the NAME whereby he shall be called.Jeremiah 23:5-6: "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS (or Yĕhovah tsidqenuw)."
In Zechariah 12:10, a prophecy which had already identified Jehovah as the one speaking (12:1, 4), Jehovah said: “... and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced ...”
This is a reference to the crucifixion. Who was pierced at the crucifixion? This passage calls Him Jehovah.
Again, Jeremiah refers to the NAME whereby he shall be called.
Isaiah doesn't say the child IS "Mighty God" Isaiah says that his name shall be called "mighty God." And I explained the meaning of "name".
1 John 5:7-8KJVNone of that matters. Orthodoxy is doctrine with an army. Not all of the ECF's believed in the divinity of Christ. Christians were free to disagree on that point until the Catholic Church declared non-trinitarians anathema and put them to death. Do you actually believe that precedence carries any weight when it is enforced by the sword? I don't.
See how this works? We have gone from a fruitful exchange of ideas to a heretic hunt. And isn't it convenient for you that we disagree on your view of the Millennium? What a coincidence.