None that you acknowledge or agree with or not symbolize away, when given.
- For years, it has been the Premil mantra that Jesus will be ruling in majesty and glory with a rod of iron for 1000 years on planet earth after the second coming. But this can be found nowhere in Revelation 20 or any other passage in Scripture?
I.e. not because they are plainly there, but because they are taken plainly by you.
No one says it doesn't.
- Premillennialists argue that salvation will continue on after the second coming. But where does it say that? The second coming brings a close to the day of salvation. Scripture makes clear: now is the day of salvation. It also shows the completion of the great commission ushers in the end of the world (Matthew 28:19-20). Scriptures tells us that “the longsuffering of our Lord” that marks the period before Jesus comes as a thief in the night “is salvation” (2 Peter 3:15). There is no more salvation after that.
I.e. reading into the words of others a false doctrine never stated.
Once again, false reading into the words of others.
- They argue that the old covenant arrangement will be fully restarted in a future millennium, even though Revelation 20 makes no mention of such teaching.
Ezekiel has parts of the OT law of Moses and sacrifices of priesthood, not all.
This is true. However not elevated above any nation pertaining to the Lord's rule and judgment over the earth, but only in priestly duties to Him personally and location of His throne.
- Premillennialists speak about the restoration of an elevated position for ethnic Israel on their future millennial earth.
Obviously, the only Scriptures of the Bible not symbolized away are in Rev 20, which is therefore only chapter accepted by some for millennial doctrine.
- But a careful study of Revelation 20 teaches no such thing.
I was joking, but now I don't think so. I believe you really do think the only Scriptures speaking of the Lord's return and reign is in Rev 20.
However, that does make sense, since it's the only place not symbolized into nothing meaningful.
The rulers and the ruled always interact, sometimes for the good and sometimes not.
- They insist that glorified saints and mortal sinners will interact in a future millennium, even though Revelation 20 makes no mention of such a belief.
All the good will be interacting the the rulers properly and lawfully.
This is a twofold misshaping of what is taught by Scripture, and what is said by those teaching it.
- They present their future millennium to be perfect pristine paradise of peace and harmony when in fact it ends up the biggest religious bust in history, as billions of wicked as the sand of the sea overrun the Premil millennium. Their age is just 'more of the same'.
It's also makes a mockery of any rule of the Lord and His resurrected saints over all the earth.
And finally, it's the self-righteous judgment of all other people, that do not agree with and join them, even as the Pharisees that wash themselves after having contact with a Gentile.
Ye know not what spirit ye are of.
You are no longer speaking of natural sheep being ruled over by the Lord, but of any becoming saved by grace through faith, to not only obey the law outwardly, but to do so righteously in spiritual purity.
- If there are mortal saints that surrender their lives to Christ in some supposed future millennium, and if the earth does indeed flee away after Satan's little season as Revelation 20 states, then there must be another rapture and glorification in order to rescue them from the regeneration or replacement of this current earth.
I.e. has nothing to do with them being ruled over in the first place.
It also skips that part about all the dead of the old earth being judged to be found in the Lamb's book of life or not.
Conclusion:
1 case of saying something doesn't exist, because someone says it doesn't. (The tree did still fall in the woods.)
3 case of perverting what others say.
1 case of getting what others say right.
1 case of getting their own favorite Chapter wrong, to ask a fraudulent question.
Not too good.