Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Hi Vet, Your words: "Those seven lamps are the seven candlesticks our Lord defined in Rev.1:20 as the 7 Churches, which was a new revealing."
I'm afraid you're getting your symbolism mixed up. The seven lamps are different from the seven candlesticks. Rev. 4:5 identifies the seven lamps as the seven Spirits of God and these are not churches.
There are several theories ranging from the Perfection of the Holy Spirit to the seven ministries of the Holy Spirit as found in Is. 11:2, to seven angels in charge of seven continents. I admit, I don't know what they represent, I just know they are not the same as candlesticks. My opinion would be they are seven archangels assigned to various parts of the earth because in Rev. 5:6, they are "sent forth". I don't believe that God would waste one's time by assigning one to Antartica as one of the seven continents, but that's just a guess.
Hi Vet, I can't tell if you're correcting your mistake or what. This is what you said in post #16: :Those seven lamps (from Zech. 4) are the seven candlesticks our Lord defined in Rev.1:20 as the 7 Churches, which was a new revealing."
The seven stars/angels of Rev. 1:20 are commonly considered the "pastors" of those churches and I see nothing in scripture to change that opinion.
Hi Vet, I can't tell if you're correcting your mistake or what. This is what you said in post #16: :Those seven lamps (from Zech. 4) are the seven candlesticks our Lord defined in Rev.1:20 as the 7 Churches, which was a new revealing."
The seven stars/angels of Rev. 1:20 are commonly considered the "pastors" of those churches and I see nothing in scripture to change that opinion.
Kaotic, Have you ever considered that Thayer might be wrong? The use of several references is always wise to see if the general consensus agrees.
som - Nice piece of fiction, have you offered it to Hollywood? Imo, the two witnesses will have little to do with the church as we'll be gone for most of their ministry. They come so the world will have a witness when the church is raptured at the 7th seal.
Kaotic, Have you ever considered that Thayer might be wrong? The use of several references is always wise to see if the general consensus agrees.
som - Nice piece of fiction, have you offered it to Hollywood? Imo, the two witnesses will have little to do with the church as we'll be gone for most of their ministry. They come so the world will have a witness when the church is raptured at the 7th seal.
Trek said,
You have already changed it!
Thayer's said,
The angels of the churches in Rev. 1:20, 2:1,8,12, and 18 are not their presbyters or bishops, but heavenly spirits who exercise such a superintendence and guardianship over them that whatever in their assemblies is worthy of praise or censure is counted to the praise or the blame of their angels also, as though the latter infused their spirit into the assemblies.
http://www.bluelette...rongs=G32&t=KJV
You will only be gone if you die. The great tribulation comes first and then after the great tribulation Christ comes as per Mat 24. You don't know what the gospel of Christ is so why would you think you could understand the book of revelation?
"But people don't care about truth. They care about remaining in denial so that they don't have to admit they're wrong!"
Sounds a little like self-incrimination to me.
Hi Vet, Your words: "Christ defined a link between the seven candlesticks and seven stars with the seven Churches per that Rev.1:20 verse. Those confused about that ought to simply READ the verse AS WRITTEN. I will label them in the verse for those willing to read... Some want to think of that word "angels" to mean flesh messengers because they do not believe in the existence of angelic spirits in Heaven."
I agree that one must read the scriptures as written. That also implies one doesn't get all boggled up by spiritualizing and symbolizing things that have literal meanings. The biggest obstacle for some is to apply "common sense", as well when reading the scriptures. So, I'll share a little of mine for those who have "ears to hear".
Christ told John to write in a book, what he will be shown and send it to the seven churches. I do believe in spiritual angels and yes the word "aggelos" can mean them, but the Strong's G32 also has as a definition, "(by implication, a pastor)". Using "common sense" do you really believe Christ is going to tell John (a physical man) to write a letter and "mail it" to seven spiritual beings??!! No, I thought not. If Christ wanted to send them a message, He'd just tell them in the spirit realm. Christ tells John: "Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus, write..." Common sense tells us that if John is writing to,... a physical person will read what he is writing, not a spiritual being.
I am the one that is reading the word as written. Those who can't see the common sense are reading into scripture things that are not there!
Your words: "No brainer." Apparently it is.
Your verse (words in parenthesis mine) This is what your verse is really saying without spiritualizing and using "common sense".
Rev. 2:5 - "Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, (I will snuff out your light and shut you down for not doing the job I have for you, that's all it means) except thou repent."
Vet, Candlesticks aren't what I was speaking about. The fallacy that the seven stars were heavenly beings is what my last point was about. Yes, the candlesticks represent the seven churches of that day, they have no future representation except that there might be several million candlesticks now.