Here's the problem with the so-called future "70th Week of Daniel."
1) The 70th Week of Daniel immediately followed the 69th Weeks of Daniel, or the "70 Weeks" prediction makes no sense. 69 Weeks + 2000 years + the 70th Week? No!
Only ancient Church Father Irenaeus and his disciple Hippolytus held to the notion of a future 70th Week, disconnected from the 69 Weeks. So it was the brainchild of Irenaeus, as far as I can tell? Or perhaps someone before him inspired this idea in him?
2) The idea of a full 70th Week of 7 years coinciding with the Reign of Antichrist tends to set that period apart from all of NT history, as if it is worse than all previous times. The idea that it will be a "great tribulation unlike any other" is falsely applied to this time period, since the "Great Tribulation was described by Jesus as applicable to the Jewish Diaspora of the NT era, which is the worst punishment in Israel's history for length of time, almost causing the Jews to cease to exist as a people.
So what really was the 3.5 years of Antichrist meant to prepare the Church for--something worse or something typical of all Christian history? In reality, antiChristianity has been around since the beginning of the Church, since the death of Christ himself.
John said that as Antichrist is coming, so already there have been many antichrists. And so, this period of time was intended to prepare the Church for the typical opposition that comes from serving Christ. It will not always be as intense an opposition as will happen when an antichrist is present. But there will always be opposition and unpopularity associated with being a Christian.
We have to be prepared for that if we are to endure to the end. There will always be antichrists in the world up until Christ comes back to defeat all opposition to his Kingdom.
1) The 70th Week of Daniel immediately followed the 69th Weeks of Daniel, or the "70 Weeks" prediction makes no sense. 69 Weeks + 2000 years + the 70th Week? No!
Only ancient Church Father Irenaeus and his disciple Hippolytus held to the notion of a future 70th Week, disconnected from the 69 Weeks. So it was the brainchild of Irenaeus, as far as I can tell? Or perhaps someone before him inspired this idea in him?
2) The idea of a full 70th Week of 7 years coinciding with the Reign of Antichrist tends to set that period apart from all of NT history, as if it is worse than all previous times. The idea that it will be a "great tribulation unlike any other" is falsely applied to this time period, since the "Great Tribulation was described by Jesus as applicable to the Jewish Diaspora of the NT era, which is the worst punishment in Israel's history for length of time, almost causing the Jews to cease to exist as a people.
So what really was the 3.5 years of Antichrist meant to prepare the Church for--something worse or something typical of all Christian history? In reality, antiChristianity has been around since the beginning of the Church, since the death of Christ himself.
John said that as Antichrist is coming, so already there have been many antichrists. And so, this period of time was intended to prepare the Church for the typical opposition that comes from serving Christ. It will not always be as intense an opposition as will happen when an antichrist is present. But there will always be opposition and unpopularity associated with being a Christian.
We have to be prepared for that if we are to endure to the end. There will always be antichrists in the world up until Christ comes back to defeat all opposition to his Kingdom.