honest question concerning what can I post

[Goinheix]

• Blasphemy will not be tolerated. This forum is intended for a Christian audience. Those who are not of the Christian faith are welcome to sign up but will be relegated to private forum discussion with staff members only. Any derogatory remarks about God (including the Son and Holy Spirit) will be removed. The same goes for remarks about Christianity. Do not hold the Bible to be the Word of God? We are not interested, then.
• Do not lie. True Christians will not post rumors or false accusations, one would think that would be a given. However, this is one thing we will not tolerate. Remember that our father hates false balances/scales (Proverbs 11:1). This includes lying about yourself to gain access to forums as well.
• No flaming, harassing, or trolling. We recognize that these terms may be unfamiliar to some, but they are a virtual extension of the insults prohibition. Flaming is when a member or members follow another member around the forum by making rude and inflammatory posts verbally attacking another member. Harassment is similar to flaming, but may be carried out through other means such as private message (PM) or email. Last but not least, trolling is the practice of making posts only meant to annoy, offend, or simply disrupt. Simply do not do any of them.
• Denominational Posts – Excessive posts either attempting to either push a single denomination (or group) or attacking another denomination are included in this rule.

Supose I believe that Jesus cames from Mars and I have several verses of the Bible demostrating my believe. opening a thread and discusing it, is it breaking any of the above rules?


Supose that I am adventist and open a post defending that Jesus did come back already. If I am a Witness and open a post against taking blodd transfusion. Are those threads breaking any rule.


What if I say that Mary, after delivering Jesus have had more childrens. Is that breaking the rules?

 

[Comm.Arnold]

Hello brother maybe you would feel more at home on a cool story forum ?

 

[Goinheix]

Hello brother maybe you would feel more at home on a cool story forum ?

If I do some of the above pots, or similar, will I get warning, an infraction or be banned?

 

[Comm.Arnold]

Well goin why do you feel the need to say such things ?

 

[Goinheix]

Well goin why do you feel the need to say such things ?

I do not believe that Jesus is from Mars. This is crazy thing I am using as example-
I dont believe that Jesus did came back, and have not problem with blood. I am not adventidst nor witness.
But it happens that I strongly believe that Mary have had more kids from Joseph after Jesus birth. And I have solid biblical evidence demostrating that Mary did have more kids, brother of Jesus. Even I have theyrs names on the Bible. If I do post saying that Mary were virgin only until Jesus birth (this is an example, i will not touch thid topic again), will i be concider an heretic, a blaspheme? Will i br stoped by the administrators for such thread and posts? If I say, and demostrate that Mary is no longer virgin will i get a warning, get a infraction or be banned? Or is it room for open discussion with mutual respect and based on the scriptures?

 

[aspen]

I do not believe that Jesus is from Mars. This is crazy thing I am using as example-
I dont believe that Jesus did came back, and have not problem with blood. I am not adventidst nor witness.
But it happens that I strongly believe that Mary have had more kids from Joseph after Jesus birth. And I have solid biblical evidence demostrating that Mary did have more kids, brother of Jesus. Even I have theyrs names on the Bible. If I do post saying that Mary were virgin only until Jesus birth (this is an example, i will not touch thid topic again), will i be concider an heretic, a blaspheme? Will i br stoped by the administrators for such thread and posts? If I say, and demostrate that Mary is no longer virgin will i get a warning, get a infraction or be banned? Or is it room for open discussion with mutual respect and based on the scriptures?

This is not a Catholic site so you are actually stating a common belief on this board. All you guys are wrong, but you will fit in nicely here, Goinheix

 

[Goinheix]

This is not a Catholic site so you are actually stating a common belief on this board. All you guys are wrong, but you will fit in nicely here, Goinheix

Is it OK to post about the non virgin Mary just because it is not a catholic church?
What if i post contrary to some sencitive doctrine that afect the interest and believes of this forum?

 

[aspen]

Is it OK to post about the non virgin Mary just because it is not a catholic church?
What if i post contrary to some sencitive doctrine that afect the interest and believes of this forum?

You can post what you like - teaching doctrine that is not orthodox Protestant is going to get you in trouble, especially if you are warned and continue to teach.

 

[FHII]

I do not believe that Jesus is from Mars. This is crazy thing I am using as example-
I dont believe that Jesus did came back, and have not problem with blood. I am not adventidst nor witness.
But it happens that I strongly believe that Mary have had more kids from Joseph after Jesus birth. And I have solid biblical evidence demostrating that Mary did have more kids, brother of Jesus. Even I have theyrs names on the Bible. If I do post saying that Mary were virgin only until Jesus birth (this is an example, i will not touch thid topic again), will i be concider an heretic, a blaspheme? Will i br stoped by the administrators for such thread and posts? If I say, and demostrate that Mary is no longer virgin will i get a warning, get a infraction or be banned? Or is it room for open discussion with mutual respect and based on the scriptures?

This is a question best answered by a moderator or administrator of the board (which I'm not), but it would be a shame if those beliefs weren't allowed. The Bible does indeed say Jesus had half brothers and even sisters, and the names of at least his brothers is given. The most famous of course would be James. Paul did say that Christ did return, and dwells in us, so in a way that is in the Bible. Jesus even said I will never leave you nor forsake you. If you are going to say that he has returned in fleshly form (immortal or mortal flesh), you may get an arguement or a call for Bible proof.

However, a moderator may feel differently.

 

[Goinheix]

You can post what you like - teaching doctrine that is not orthodox Protestant is going to get you in trouble, especially if you are warned and continue to teach.

Are you saying that i am not aloud to post and teach anything different that the commonn believe of the administrators? If the administrators are wrong concerning the age of Jesus when at the cross...then there is not a chance to correct that mistake? If the administrators insist in a detrmined age and i provide solid evidence in contrary i will be warned, infracted, banned and eventually expulsed for good?

 

[Goinheix]

This is a question best answered by a moderator or administrator of the board (which I'm not), but it would be a shame if those beliefs weren't allowed. The Bible does indeed say Jesus had half brothers and even sisters, and the names of at least his brothers is given. The most famous of course would be James. Paul did say that Christ did return, and dwells in us, so in a way that is in the Bible. Jesus even said I will never leave you nor forsake you. If you are going to say that he has returned in fleshly form (immortal or mortal flesh), you may get an arguement or a call for Bible proof.

However, a moderator may feel differently.

Godd example. The Bible never say that Jesus had half brother and sisters. The Bible simply say that Jesus had brothers and sister. I am not really interested in posting in referesce to that topic; but it is a excellent example. If it happens that I insist in posting that the Bible talks about brother and sister, independently of being the thruth (that the Bible dont include the word "half") I will be in deep throuble posting different than the personal opinion and interpretation of a administrator.

In such case, it will good for all the times one of us is discussing with an admonistrator for him to identofy as one. Then, whatever he say, whatever he post, we know not to refute, even if he is totally wrong.

I Shall like to have an answer of a administrator as you say. Any how, if that is your opinion, I already have the tip that you will never ever, by not reason be posting any different that the administrator. You will not be posting your sincere and honest opinion but what the administrator aloud you to say.

 

[aspen]

Are you saying that i am not aloud to post and teach anything different that the commonn believe of the administrators? If the administrators are wrong concerning the age of Jesus when at the cross...then there is not a chance to correct that mistake? If the administrators insist in a detrmined age and i provide solid evidence in contrary i will be warned, infracted, banned and eventually expulsed for good?

You can disagree; you can even lay out your case, but it is unwise to teach doctrine outside of orthodox Protestant doctrine. I am Catholic and I do not hide it, but I do not teach Catholic doctrine either. I am not telling you what to do - feel free to do what you want.

Godd example. The Bible never say that Jesus had half brother and sisters. The Bible simply say that Jesus had brothers and sister. I am not really interested in posting in referesce to that topic; but it is a excellent example. If it happens that I insist in posting that the Bible talks about brother and sister, independently of being the thruth (that the Bible dont include the word "half") I will be in deep throuble posting different than the personal opinion and interpretation of a administrator.

In such case, it will good for all the times one of us is discussing with an admonistrator for him to identofy as one. Then, whatever he say, whatever he post, we know not to refute, even if he is totally wrong.

I Shall like to have an answer of a administrator as you say. Any how, if that is your opinion, I already have the tip that you will never ever, by not reason be posting any different that the administrator. You will not be posting your sincere and honest opinion but what the administrator aloud you to say.

The Bible has never been a specific record of how relatives are related to each other:

[font="arial][size="2"]In the Bible, Lot was Abraham's nephew. Abraham was his uncle (Gen 11:31 & 14:12). Yet the Bible twice describes Lot as Abraham's "brother." That is because the word "brother" doesn't necessarily mean a sibling. (As stated above, it can mean cousin, relative or close neighbor.) But see Gen 12:5 - "...and Lot his brother's son..."[/size][/font]
[font="arial] [/font][/color]
[color="#333333"][font="arial][size="2"]Also everyone was related to each other back than anyway - sisters married brothers / Lot fathered children with his own daughters - Joseph could of been his own grandpa.[/size][/font]

 

[Goinheix]

You can disagree; you can even lay out your case, but it is unwise to teach doctrine outside of orthodox Protestant doctrine. I am Catholic and I do not hide it, but I do not teach Catholic doctrine either. I am not telling you what to do - feel free to do what you want.

You also said: " it would be a shame if those beliefs weren't allowed".


I really like to have an administrator to give an answer; because in other forums those posting different from the common believe of the administrator - specifically me - have been insulted, have been cal nonchristian, have been call heretic; and the admonistrator did aloud all those rules braking because they were oposite to my postings and teachings. Eventually I did prove out of any possible refutation that my teching was biblically correct. Immedietely, having not scape ot, having not any more argumentation, they did close thethread and ban me authomatically. Only because I insited and susceded to prove that they werer wrong.

I have been posting and teaching thigs that were not in contradiction to:
to any verse or text of the Bible

to any teaching of the fathers of the Church

to any christian creed

to any of the teaches of the reformers

to any christian and/or protestant statement of faith

to any confesional of any christian life

But in contradiction of some modern scholars and theologist.
I was call heretic and unhotthodix with no reason other that discreping to authors of the last centuries.


Is ther any administrator that can give an answer and save me a despointment?



If

 

[aspen]

You also said: " it would be a shame if those beliefs weren't allowed".


I really like to have an administrator to give an answer; because in other forums those posting different from the common believe of the administrator - specifically me - have been insulted, have been cal nonchristian, have been call heretic; and the admonistrator did aloud all those rules braking because they were oposite to my postings and teachings. Eventually I did prove out of any possible refutation that my teching was biblically correct. Immedietely, having not scape ot, having not any more argumentation, they did close thethread and ban me authomatically. Only because I insited and susceded to prove that they werer wrong.

I have been posting and teaching thigs that were not in contradiction to:
to any verse or text of the Bible

to any teaching of the fathers of the Church

to any christian creed

to any of the teaches of the reformers

to any christian and/or protestant statement of faith

to any confesional of any christian life

But in contradiction of some modern scholars and theologist.
I was call heretic and unhotthodix with no reason other that discreping to authors of the last centuries.


Is ther any administrator that can give an answer and save me a despointment?



If

You should ask your question on this link: http://www.christianityboard.com/forum/35-christianity-board-helpdesk/

 

[Goinheix]

You can disagree; you can even lay out your case, but it is unwise to teach doctrine outside of orthodox Protestant doctrine. I am Catholic and I do not hide it, but I do not teach Catholic doctrine either. I am not telling you what to do - feel free to do what you want.



The Bible has never been a specific record of how relatives are related to each other:

[font="arial][size="2"]In the Bible, Lot was Abraham's nephew. Abraham was his uncle (Gen 11:31 & 14:12). Yet the Bible twice describes Lot as Abraham's "brother." That is because the word "brother" doesn't necessarily mean a sibling. (As stated above, it can mean cousin, relative or close neighbor.) But see Gen 12:5 - "...and Lot his brother's son..."[/size][/font]
[font="arial] [/font][/color]
[color="#333333"][font="arial][size="2"]Also everyone was related to each other back than anyway - sisters married brothers / Lot fathered children with his own daughters - Joseph could of been his own grandpa.[/size][/font]

The Bible never states that Jesus had half brother...that is a false statement and will be good that you admit your mistake
The word "brother" can be interpreted in many maners. One of the is "chidren of the same mother" It is your interpretation, just your and all catholics interpretation that in the case of Mary "brithers" dont mean "children of the same mother"

I really dont care. I dont see any problem in Mary having sex with her legitimate husband. I dont see any theological problem to admit that she did enjoy having sex with Joseph. I dont see it as offensive beloieving that she did came to the orgasm in many ocations. But more specifically I dont found any basis on the Bible to asume that Mary didnt have a normal and regualr marital life. Also I dont found any clue indicating that after giving birth to Jesus, Mary body continues to be anatomically virgin.

In other hand I see very well how Mary was mixed by sincretism with one pagan virgin godess.
And i believe that this were a catholic forum, before trying to refute my argumentation you will expulse of it.

 

[Goinheix]

I am done.

I do love all christians. few years ago my daughter (28 years old) was bapticed in a catholic church. she was bapticed the Mary day. the catholic churches are full of genuine and sincere christians. despite having few doctrines wrong, i do deeply respect the catholics. along the history, the catholict did some bad things and many very good thinmgs. i apologice if i am ofending you. the best i can do is to quit this topic on Mary.

there is not anything that prevent as from interpreting "brothers" as brothers by Joseph, or even cousins. it is impossible to prove it one way or the other.

there is nothing in the Bible saying that Mary did not continues to be virgin, despite such version comes from later non biblical traditions (susanne)

in the Gosples there is only one small detail that makes as understand that Jesus did not have marital life with mary until Jesus birth...leaving an open window to interpretate that Joseph did have such marital life after Jesus birth. but it is very tiny suport for that.

the coincidence of a pagan virgin godess is very embarrasing, but proves nothing.



i propose you keep loving me, and i comtinue to love you without alouding this topic to be a oportunity for satan to make us fight.

 

[aspen]

I am done.

I do love all christians. few years ago my daughter (28 years old) was bapticed in a catholic church. she was bapticed the Mary day. the catholic churches are full of genuine and sincere christians. despite having few doctrines wrong, i do deeply respect the catholics. along the history, the catholict did some bad things and many very good thinmgs. i apologice if i am ofending you. the best i can do is to quit this topic on Mary.

there is not anything that prevent as from interpreting "brothers" as brothers by Joseph, or even cousins. it is impossible to prove it one way or the other.

there is nothing in the Bible saying that Mary did not continues to be virgin, despite such version comes from later non biblical traditions (susanne)

in the Gosples there is only one small detail that makes as understand that Jesus did not have marital life with mary until Jesus birth...leaving an open window to interpretate that Joseph did have such marital life after Jesus birth. but it is very tiny suport for that.

the coincidence of a pagan virgin godess is very embarrasing, but proves nothing.



i propose you keep loving me, and i comtinue to love you without alouding this topic to be a oportunity for satan to make us fight.

I chose to become Catholic (was Protestant) and came to a new understanding of Mary, based on Church history, Tradition and the Bible. Although her role was important in the Christian narrative, devotion to her has nothing to do with salvation. I believe we can safely and wisely agree to disagree on this subject.

 

[Goinheix]

I chose to become Catholic (was Protestant) and came to a new understanding of Mary, based on Church history, Tradition and the Bible. Although her role was important in the Christian narrative, devotion to her has nothing to do with salvation. I believe we can safely and wisely agree to disagree on this subject.

Glad to meet you.

 

[aspen]

Glad to meet you.

Nice to meet you, as well.

 

[Angelina]

Hi Goinheix!

Welcome to CB!

You can direct your questions to the Administrator " HammerStone " by sending him a PM [sending a personal message]

He is not available at the moment due to a family death but I'm sure he will be able to answer any queries that you may have regarding Christianity Board rules...I personally do not think that you will be breaking any rules by having an opinion on a subject that is not fundamental to our faith, in Jesus.

Bless you and welcome again!