I don't really know what you mean here . . . of course there are the OT faithful who are accepted by God.Even the RCC acknowledges the Old Testament saints
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't really know what you mean here . . . of course there are the OT faithful who are accepted by God.Even the RCC acknowledges the Old Testament saints
It's worse than a false hope. The doctrine has spawned cults like Heaven's Gate that commit mass suicide. In the case of Heaven's Gate, the head nut job said that a UFO behind a comet was going to take them all to safety, so they put on coveralls with patches like space suits, new sneakers and took poison when the comet arrived.
They weren't the only cult to do something like that, but their wacky doctrine came from a former Christian who expanded on rapture doctrine. It's escapist doctrine driven by fear, and some folks will take their own lives rather than have to pass through the tribulation unharmed.
Absolutely. The Lord has taught me things from scripture about that kingdom, but not to share so much as to understand the reason for certain "divine appointments," that left me doubting my sanity.There's a lot more depth to this, we are just skimming the surface here.
I've long thought that one's ecclesiology will have more to do with they rapture view than anything else. And how literally/metaphorically they interpret the Bible. But then those are inextricably bound also.
This may seem a change of topic but I assure you it is not. Let me ask you, are you millennialist? Do you believe that Jesus will rule the world from Jerusalem, that Israel will be an entire nation of priests, and that the nations of the world will come to Jerusalem to worship Jesus there?
Do you believe that the 12 Apostles will sit as judges over the 12 tribes?
Much love!
I see no requirements of believers in scripture other than belief and obedience, but scripture clearly defines the saints who come out of the great tribulation as part of His church and as those who will live and reign with Him in His kingdom.Do you understand the point that he is making?
There is no "requirement" for any particular believer to experience the tribulations of the end of the age.
And just the same, no believer is exempt from experiencing tribulations in the course of their life.
Much love!
You seem very concerned with temporal sequence regarding the church. Eg the Gentile church as opposed to the entire church. As an example, the modern church didn't exist until after Pentecost. That much is obvious. However, that doesn't make the Old Testament saints any less part of His Church.I think this is a bit premature . . . or . . . can you describe back to me in simple terms what my reasoning is? Perhaps you understand me better than it seems.
Much love!
Do you see this kingdom as being the same kingdom that Jesus came offering to Israel? And that had they received Jesus as their Messiah, that kingdom would have begun?Absolutely. The Lord has taught me things from scripture about that kingdom, but not to share so much as to understand the reason for certain "divine appointments," that left me doubting my sanity.
Ok, but the point being clarified here is that the argument that "No Christian is exempt from tribulation" is not a valid argument to show Christians must endure the Great Tribulation, right?I see no requirements of believers in scripture other than belief and obedience, but scripture clearly defines the saints who come out of the great tribulation as part of His church and as those who will live and reign with Him in His kingdom.
I'm not understand from this how you understand my reasoning, and how it might be "compromised".You seem very concerned with temporal sequence regarding the church. Eg the Gentile church as opposed to the entire church. As an example, the modern church didn't exist until after Pentecost. That much is obvious. However, that doesn't make the Old Testament saints any less part of His Church.
Time is a spatial dimension and part of creation. This isn't just special relativity theory, but expressed in the first chapter of Genesis. There were no days before God separated the light from the darkness on day one.
So time is entirely irrelevant to God. We experience time as part of creation, but He could only experience time by entering His creation as the Holy Spirit, and as His Son. This isn't expressed in scripture because our natural experience is the passage of time. We live in a moment, but are aware of past and present. As it is written God placed eternity in our hearts, it's part of our conscious awareness.
We see a creation of the church at Pentecost, He saw it from the foundation of the world. The mind of Christ gives us God's perspective or it would be impossible to understand prophecy.
Not exactly, but the Lord wasn't offering a worldly kingdom in His first appearance. He knew the scriptures and He knew He was headed for the cross, not a throne in Jerusalem.Do you see this kingdom as being the same kingdom that Jesus came offering to Israel? And that had they received Jesus as their Messiah, that kingdom would have begun?
Much love!
I don't believe it's optional. You're either here or your not. But the Tim LaHaye stuff is sheer fantasy. If we're saved to be His witnesses and salt and light to a dying world, why would we be yanked off the planet when we're needed the most? That's just crazy.Ok, but the point being clarified here is that the argument that "No Christian is exempt from tribulation" is not a valid argument to show Christians must endure the Great Tribulation, right?
Much love!
Not exactly. Paul preached first in synagogues wherever he went, then moved on to preach to gentiles. The first church in Jerusalem was largely Jewish. The church leaders were Apostles and members of Jesus ' family.I'm not understand from this how you understand my reasoning, and how it might be "compromised".
Yes, God is eternal, and is not bound by our continuum, having Himself created it. I think we are in agreement on that.
Paul wrote that the Jews having rejected the Gospel, that it would henceforth go directly to the Gentiles. While God is eternal, this is still what happened, right?
God is eternal, but still Israel was the only nation that could have covenant relationship with God during OT times, right? And then Jesus brought all people near to Him, and now all people can have covenant relationship with Him.
In Ecclesiates, I think the better understanding is that God has fixed man's hearts in this world, so that no one can understand what He is doing.
Ecclesiastes 3:11 KJV
11) He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.
Much love!
Not exactly. Paul preached first in synagogues wherever he went, then moved on to preach to gentiles. The first church in Jerusalem was largely Jewish. The church leaders were Apostles and members of Jesus ' family.
Tim LaHaye? I didn't see his posts . . .But the Tim LaHaye stuff is sheer fantasy.
That's just is . . . this affects those who are here at the time. Whomever that is.You're either here or your not.
God doesn't have other witnesses? The Revelation portrays that otherwise. Two witnesses. 144,000 Israelites. Angels flying through the skies . . .If we're saved to be His witnesses and salt and light to a dying world, why would we be yanked off the planet when we're needed the most? That's just crazy.
God is not a big fan of cowardice.
What is your thinking on Peter's statement?Not exactly, but the Lord wasn't offering a worldly kingdom in His first appearance. He knew the scriptures and He knew He was headed for the cross, not a throne in Jerusalem.
Interesting idea, and one I've not heard before. I can only think of one place, where Paul says we will judge angels, is that where you get this idea from?I think that in the Millennium, the angels are granted the opportunity to experience flesh and choice,
why would we be yanked off the planet when we're needed the most? That's just crazy.
This all happens after the fiery cleansing of the Second Coming. Judaism has nothing to do with it.
You put Satan in the NHNE. Should we call that Satanism?
Yes I've read this at least a dozen times, but every passage about Paul's travels has him start preaching in the synagogues and moving out to preach to the gentiles. Acts also has Peter as an Apostle to the Jews and doesn't even speak to some of the other apostles at all. This was because Acts was written by Luke, a companion of Paul.Acts 28:25-28 KJV
25) And when they agreed not among themselves, they departed, after that Paul had spoken one word, Well spake the Holy Ghost by Esaias the prophet unto our fathers,
26) Saying, Go unto this people, and say, Hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive:
27) For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
28) Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it.
Much love!