BibleScribe
Member
Hi Veteran,
I would suggest that the vehicle mechanics belie your paint. The fact is, you obviously have no clue as to the merit of the text, and thus arrive to an incorrect conclusion. Specifically, ( -- not a complete synopsis):
* The interpretation is NOT from the book of Jeremiah.
* The "going forth of the word" is NOT from a man, but directly from GOD.
* The shibiym/shabuwa (plural/singular) is not the usual concise Feminine gender, but rather the inconcise Masculine gender.
* The seven and the sixty-two and NOT one number. If the AUTHOR had intended this as such, HE would have simply said ~sixty-nine~.
* There is an anointed one after the seven, and a second anointed one after the sixty-two.
* The term "after" is not immediately, but simply subsequent to.
* The destroyer comes after the seventieth shabuwa.
And of course, these are not all the observations to discount an ancient fulfillment, for it was Montgomery who described this prophecy as the "dismal swamp" of OT prophecy.
BibleScribe
Then again, maybe you can explain exactly how you arrive at a 7-year Tribulation. -- Or maybe you should read your own words to yourself.
BibleScribe
I would suggest that the vehicle mechanics belie your paint. The fact is, you obviously have no clue as to the merit of the text, and thus arrive to an incorrect conclusion. Specifically, ( -- not a complete synopsis):
* The interpretation is NOT from the book of Jeremiah.
* The "going forth of the word" is NOT from a man, but directly from GOD.
* The shibiym/shabuwa (plural/singular) is not the usual concise Feminine gender, but rather the inconcise Masculine gender.
* The seven and the sixty-two and NOT one number. If the AUTHOR had intended this as such, HE would have simply said ~sixty-nine~.
* There is an anointed one after the seven, and a second anointed one after the sixty-two.
* The term "after" is not immediately, but simply subsequent to.
* The destroyer comes after the seventieth shabuwa.
And of course, these are not all the observations to discount an ancient fulfillment, for it was Montgomery who described this prophecy as the "dismal swamp" of OT prophecy.
BibleScribe
BibleScribe, on 02 August 2011 - 07:22 AM, said:
I'm not sure why you assign Daniel's seventieth week as the Tribulation week. Do you believe lies?
Revelation 13:5 defines the Tribulation as 42 months. This is correct.
BibleScribe
Well that's an incorrect assumption. Revelation 13:5 describes the reign of the anti-christ as 42 months, not the duration of the tribulation!
Revelation 13:5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
Why do you have to respond with comments like, "Do you believe lies."
Maybe it's you who is "believing lies!
Then again, maybe you can explain exactly how you arrive at a 7-year Tribulation. -- Or maybe you should read your own words to yourself.
BibleScribe