The text plainly says "lay by him in store", which means "by him in storage". Where did individual Jews keep their things "in storage", Dead Bread, in a church collection plate, as you so ridiculously suggest? No, at home in a jar, cupboard, or buried for safe keeping! Jews were not to concern themselves with financial affairs when they got paid on Friday afternoon - the Sabbath was approaching. They would handle them after the Sabbath "on the first day of the week", which is why Paul told them to set aside some $$$ on "the first day of the week" after the Sabbath, but before they'd spent it all on bills and whatnot. No Sunday morning church collection plate in here anywhere.
Error #4: Col. 2:16-17 establishes Sunday sacredness
As usual, the layers of satanic papal deception are so numerous, we need to peel back each one and examine them individually. You and the papacy insist Paul is referring to the "weekly Sabbath" in Colossians 2:16-17. Let's see what the evidence says:
The context, which mentions "meat, drink, holy days, new moons, is clearly dealing with the Ceremonial Law of Moses, not the Sabbath of the Ten Commandments which "stand fast forever and ever" - which Isaiah says will be observed in the new Heaven (Isaiah 66:23). To insist that Paul's use of "sabbaths" refers to the Ten Commandment Sabbath when the rest of the verse content unequivocally refers to the Mosaic Law is theological skulduggery. It's dishonest hermeneutics.
The weekly Sabbath wasn't a "shadow" of anything - it was made before sin, when all was light. However, the yearly sabbaths of the Jews were most certainly "shadows of things to come",Atonement, and Tabernacles). The weekly Sabbath is no shadow of anything, it is a memorial to Creation "for in six days the Lord made heaven, the earth, and the sea, and rested on the seventh day, same Creation account in Genesis the Whore of Babylon says is mythology? Why do papists hate the Word of God so much? Oh, it exposes their lies, that's why.