Is The Rapture A Literal Event?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,996
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Perhaps you can put things IN CONTEXT, and help out with the following.
John 3 [13] And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.
Christians stumble over this verse all the time, but if it is kept within its context, it is very clear as to what Jesus meant.

JESUS IS THE LORD FROM HEAVEN
11 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness.
12 If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? 13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but He that came down from heaven, even the Son of Man which is in Heaven.

1. Jesus of Nazareth was asserting here THAT HE WAS NO ORDINARY MAN. He was the Lord from Heaven (1 Cor 15:47 -- The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second Man is the Lord from Heaven.)
2. Not only was He the Son of Man who had come down from Heaven, but even while on earth, He was still in Heaven (in Spirit)!
3. Therefore He is speaking about His UNIQUE resurrection and ascension into Heaven.
4. No man on earth had ever come directly from Heaven, died, been buried, been resurrected, and then ascended directly to Heaven. That is the significance of verse 13.
5. Thus verse 13 does not exclude Enoch and Elijah. It simply tells us that Christ's descent from and ascent to Heaven are totally unique.

Who are the parents of the Elijah and Enoch you mentioned?
This is totally irrelevant.
Do you believe Elijah and Enoch CAME DOWN from heaven, and then went BACK to heaven?
Elijah did indeed come from Heaven at the Transfiguration of Christ and then went back to Heaven. But he never died and was then resurrected (as was Christ). He was taken up body, soul, and spirit.

Do I believe every word of Scripture? Absolutely. And that is why I am giving you this clarification.
 

stunnedbygrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
12,397
12,048
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yeah, I get it. I guess I take issue when people start deciding who is going to be left behind

Yeah...like, everyone just assumes they will be one of those counted worthy to escape the time of testing coming on the world...
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbyrd009

Stan B

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2019
1,967
983
113
81
Toronto
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
How is that relevant to the FACT -- the Bible FACT -- that Enoch and Elijah were taken to Heaven (and in those bodies)?

And it came to pass, when the LORD would take up Elijah into Heaven by a whirlwind, that Elijah went with Elisha from Gilgal...And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold,there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into Heaven. (2 Kings 2:1,11)

By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God. (Heb 11:5)

It is never a good idea to take Scripture out of context.

Enoch, so how do we resolve the apparent conflict that "no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven." ??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Helen

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,996
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Enoch, so how do we resolve the apparent conflict that "no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven." ??
The key is in "ascended up". This is a reference to the unique ascension of Christ, where He was actually "carried up" (presumably by angels), and also "received up" (presumably by the Father) and no man has ever ascended up in that fashion.

And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into Heaven. (Lk 24:51) So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into Heaven, and sat on the right hand of God. (Mk 16:19)

And to emphasize that uniqueness Christ also stated two critical things: (1) he that came down from Heaven, and (2) He that is simultaneously in Heaven -- "even the Son of Man which is [PRESENT TENSE] in Heaven". This sets Christ apart from either Enoch or Elijah.

The use of the term "the Son of Man" reveals that Jesus was speaking about the divine Messiah, and the Jews would understand this from the prophecy of Daniel. That is why they accused Him of blasphemy (later on) when He alluded to that before His crucifixion.
Jesus saith unto him [the High Priest], Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of Heaven. Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy. (Mt 26:64,65)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan B

Taken

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Encounter Team
Feb 6, 2018
24,573
12,984
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Christians stumble over this verse all the time, but if it is kept within its context, it is very clear as to what Jesus meant.

Perhaps people do stumble over understanding this verse.

The verse I mentioned was:
John 3:
[13] And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.

JESUS IS THE LORD FROM HEAVEN
11 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness.
12 If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? 13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but He that came down from heaven, even the Son of Man which is in Heaven.


Uh huh, aware of those scriptures and what they mean.

John 3:13 is clear.
NO MAN, has ascended UP to Heaven, but He who Came DOWN from Heaven.
He who came DOWN from Heaven, is Identified; He who is "called" Son of God, (and later "called", the Son of man).
The only one "called" the "S"on of man IS the same whose "name" is JESUS.

Luke 1 [35] And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be "called" the Son of God.

Luke 1:
[31] And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his "name" JESUS.

Luke 24:37 ... the "supposed" son of Joseph.

Heb 2:16 ...took "upon" himself the seed of Abraham...
(Thus he was the SON of Man (Abraham, the faithful)....and according to tradition the sons, are also called "sons" of their grand & ascending grand fathers..

Thus Jesus taking upon Himself the Seed of Abraham...MADE Him a descendant of Abraham's "stock" descendants.

(And to NOTE...the Scriptures are exclusive of identifying Abraham as "faithful"...and so also it was Jesus who is "faithful", and the "stock' Descendants of Abraham, "who were "faithful", is whom Jesus is identified, as "having taken on THEIR seed".


1. Jesus of Nazareth was asserting here THAT HE WAS NO ORDINARY MAN. He was the Lord from Heaven (1 Cor 15:47 -- The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second Man is the Lord from Heaven.)


Uh huh, aware, not in question.

2. Not only was He the Son of Man who had come down from Heaven, but even while on earth, He was still in Heaven (in Spirit)!

Not in question.

What was in one Question was the "background" parental history of Elijah and Enoch, that you said was "irrelevant".

This is "totally" irrelevant.

I disagree.
A NAME and CALLING and TAKING, are significant.

Enoch was an earthly man out of the dust of the earth, with earthly parents.
Elijah was an earthly man out of the dust of the earth, with earthly parents.
Jesus is the Lord who came forth out from God in Heaven.

John 16
[28] I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father.

John 16

[27] For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God.

Continued;

Glory to God,
Taken
 

Taken

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Encounter Team
Feb 6, 2018
24,573
12,984
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
1. Jesus of Nazareth was asserting here THAT HE WAS NO ORDINARY MAN. He was the Lord from Heaven (1 Cor 15:47 -- The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second Man is the Lord from Heaven.)

AND...
John 3:
[13] And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven...


Scripture notifies us;
That which God created (BY forming from Dust, ON Earth, OF the Dust of the ground, was a FORM, God called a man.

Gen 7
[7] And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground,

Our FORM, is our BODY.

2. Not only was He the Son of Man who had come down from Heaven,

Disagree with your wording.
"The Son of MAN, did not come down from Heaven. "The Spirit of God, (The SEED of God ), came down from Heaven"


The "FORM" (BODY) that was Revealed, at Jesus' birth....WAS A BODY, "prepared" of God....Was a FORM, (of a FAITHFUL Servant ) Jesus took upon Himself.

Heb 10

[5] Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:

What did that body LOOK LIKE?

Phil 2:8 ...The fashion, "as a man"...
Phil 2:7 ..."Likeness" of men...

What reputation did that body have?

Phil 2:7 ...A "servant".

What did that body DO?

Phil 2:8 ... Became "obedient unto death".

What was UNDER the BODY, (form) he "took upon Himself" ?

Phil 2:6 ... the "form of God".


Phil 2

[6] Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
[7] But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
[8] And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.


but even while on earth, He was still in Heaven (in Spirit)!

Agree, God is everywhere.

3. Therefore He is speaking about His UNIQUE resurrection and ascension into Heaven.

I believe Jesus was the WORD of God in the FLESH likeness as a man, that men COULD see, as God promised. A teacher BY example for earthly men to witness and speak of what they had seen, that others might believe.

4. No man on earth had ever come directly from Heaven, died, been buried, been resurrected, and then ascended directly to Heaven. That is the significance of verse 13.

Earthly Men, are formed bodies.
Their Life is their blood.
Their Life is tainted/corrupt/sinfull, from their natural birth.
Their body is brought into a Living state, when they Receive the Breath of Life, from God, and thereafter a man IS both a FORM and a Living soul.

5. Thus verse 13 does not exclude Enoch and Elijah. It simply tells us that Christ's descent from and ascent to Heaven are totally unique.

Verse 13 did not "INCLUDE" Enoch and Elijah.


This is totally irrelevant.

The relevance was establishing, Elijah and Enoch were men out of the Earth, NOT FORMS/ Bodily men who came down from heaven, then returned to Heaven.

Elijah did indeed come from Heaven at the Transfiguration of Christ and then went back to Heaven.

Scripture clearly notifies us:
Bodies of men do not originate IN Heaven.
ALL bodies of men are Sentenced to DIE, God requires it.
All Bodies of men "shall be raised", some to glory, some to damnation...Following a TRUMP signal.
ALL saved souls, depart their physically DEAD body, and GO TO Heaven.
Bodies of DEAD men WERE raised (on Earth) and their living soul returned to them.

But he never died and was then resurrected (as was Christ). He was taken up body, soul, and spirit.

There is NO evidence Enoch or Elijah, BODILY when UP to Heaven. <--- THAT is historical theory, philosophies, mindful conclusions. It does not say that IN Scripture.

Scripture DOES SAY;
The Lord "GIVES" Life and the Lord "TAKES AWAY LIFE".

1 Sam 2:6
[6] The LORD killeth, and maketh alive:

Job 1:21
[21] And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away;

^ Forms/Bodies come forth out of the womb.
^ Gods Breath begins the individuals Life, of his own given soul.

The Life God gives IS His BREATH, in a soul.
The Body is not the soul.

God Gives the Body Life.
God Takes Away the Body's Life.

The Faithful soul departs the dead body and goes to Heaven.

Both the Bodily form...AND...the soul are CALLED by the mans Identity, ie the mans NAME, and are a Reference to THAT man.

IN Context;

Enoch was an earthly man.
Enoch's father was Jared.
Enoch son was Methuselah.
Enoch "walked" with God.
Enoch lived 365 years.
Enoch was "TAKEN" by God.

Gen 5:
[19] And Jared lived after he begat Enoch eight hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:
[20] And all the days of Jared were nine hundred sixty and two years: and he died.
[21] And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah:
[22] And Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:
[23] And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years:
[24] And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

Walking "WITH" God is what a "FAITHFUL" servant does.

Taken by God, is the BODILY Form becoming "DEAD".

What God "TAKES to Heaven" is the "LIVING SOUL" that departs a physically DEAD BODY.

Nowhere does Scripture say, the BODY of Enoch rose UP to Heaven.

^ THAT is an earthly mans, GUESSING.
Guessing does not constitute a FACT.

In Context; About Elijah.

Elijah is identified by his clan; the Tishbite's.
Elijah is revealed as a faithful man of God, and stood against false gods, even when up against kings who believed in false gods.

2 Kings 2:1
[1] And it came to pass, when the LORD would take up Elijah into heaven by a whirlwind, that Elijah went with Elisha from Gilgal.

^ That is "written" knowledge Revealed after the fact it became "known" the LORD, "TOOK" Elijah, and "HOW" (in a whirlwind), Elijah was LAST SEEN by other men.

The Key word is NOT, that Elijah was Last SEEN in a "whirlwind". Any man can be "last seen" in a "whirlwind", something we might call a "tornado"; Wind "whirling" in a circular motion.

The Key word IS, the LORD "TOOK" Elijah.

Again, IN CONTEXT, (without philosophies and mindful ideas of men)...

The Lord God, TAKES the LIFE of mans BODY, that it becomes DEAD, and Returns to the Earth from whence it came.

The Lord God, TAKES the LIFE of a "FAITHFUL" Living soul, "TO" Heaven, that it REMAIN with the Lord God.

While you believe and teach that ELIJAH and ENOCH Bodily were TAKEN to HEAVEN.

I disagree. Scripture does not say so. Scripture teaches...Saved souls and Quickened spirits GO UP TO Heaven and BODY'S return to the earth.

About the TWO WITNESSES, at Jesus' ascension...They were UNNAMED witnesses.
It is speculation of WHO they are.

I would without doubt say the two WITNESSES, were Saved souls, that were IN their RISEN from the Earth Bodies, dressed in White....

My speculation is; Their bodies returned TO the Earth...and their living SOULS returned to Heaven, As WITNESSES, IN Heaven (to other Living Souls), THAT THEY SAW, Jesus RISE UP to Heaven...(since Living SOULS IN HEAVEN, would have ALSO for the first time, BEEN SEEING JESUS for the First time, as He arrived in Heaven)...
IOW, the TWO witnesses, were verifying...JESUS is JESUS the Lord.

Throughout Scripture it is taught...
God TAKES the LIFE of the earthly BODY, and it returns to the Earth.
God Saves the Soul and quickened spirit OF men, and those things DEPART dead bodies, and GO...to Paradise, Heaven, where the Tree of Life is.

It is also noted God Can and Has Raised DEAD BODIES, and "PUT" their Living soul, back IN it's BODY, (on Earth).

But nowhere is it taught, BODIES of earthly men have RISEN up to Heaven.

Do I believe every word of Scripture? Absolutely. And that is why I am giving you this clarification.

Thanks, but your "clarification" hinges on "philosophies and theories of men".

Glory to God,
Thanks
 
Last edited:

Reggie Belafonte

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2018
5,871
2,919
113
63
Brisbane
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Since I quoted Scripture, what you are saying here is that YOU DO NOT believe the Bible totally. Just whatever you wish to pick and choose.
I do not pick and choose at all.
I do believe in the Holy Bible.
Look at what dear Taken has put forward, I am in agreement with such and such is scripture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taken

Taken

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Encounter Team
Feb 6, 2018
24,573
12,984
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I do not pick and choose at all.
I do believe in the Holy Bible.
Look at what dear Taken has put forward, I am in agreement with such and such is scripture.

I think we all can get a bit side tracked at times being wrapped up in our own passion of Walking with God.

We don't all hear, read, learn, study the exact same things, at the exact same time, or for the exact say amount of time, thus our "Distance" on our walk with God, varies.

I agree with many things Enoch111 has said, and disagree with some things Enoch111 has said. And the same with you and others.

Understanding scriptures is an ongoing process. And when someone says something that my instinct is to disagree, I often go to direct my reading and study to THAT point of disagreement, for verification, of what they say. Sometimes, I set it aside, if I am already in an intense study of another topic.

"Cherry-picking" is one of those terms, like, "hate, bigot, discriminate, anti, racist...etc." that is immediately "supposed" to "put the other in a bad light" and "supposed" to deflect from the point, and "put" the other on a course of "defending" themselves.

"I", absolutely believe all Scripture is true...
But absolutely, "I cherry-pick".
"I" absolutely "ONLY" apply To myself, that which applies To "me".

You said, the Rapture was a new age thing.
I will agree, the word "Rapture" is a fairly new "English Language" Term, dating back to the early 1800's.

And agree with Enoch111, that the soles saved IN Christ, was taught 2,000 + years ago, will be "caught up" in the air, to meet the Lord, before the Great Tribulation.

I also believe, many who disagree with the EVENT referenced as "The Rapture", do not fully know or understand exactly ...
Who, what, when, why, where or how, "The Rapture" applies to.

Whomever believes IN the event called "The Rapture...should know the who, what, when, why, where and how...
As well, one who does not believe in the event called "The Rapture", should know WHY he does not believe in such an event.

Glory to God,
Taken
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reggie Belafonte

Stan B

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2019
1,967
983
113
81
Toronto
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
The key is in "ascended up". This is a reference to the unique ascension of Christ, where He was actually "carried up" (presumably by angels), and also "received up" (presumably by the Father) and no man has ever ascended up in that fashion.
I have checked a number of commentaries, who have as many different opinions on this, as there are commentators.
 

Reggie Belafonte

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2018
5,871
2,919
113
63
Brisbane
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I think we all can get a bit side tracked at times being wrapped up in our own passion of Walking with God.

We don't all hear, read, learn, study the exact same things, at the exact same time, or for the exact say amount of time, thus our "Distance" on our walk with God, varies.

I agree with many things Enoch111 has said, and disagree with some things Enoch111 has said. And the same with you and others.

Understanding scriptures is an ongoing process. And when someone says something that my instinct is to disagree, I often go to direct my reading and study to THAT point of disagreement, for verification, of what they say. Sometimes, I set it aside, if I am already in an intense study of another topic.

"Cherry-picking" is one of those terms, like, "hate, bigot, discriminate, anti, racist...etc." that is immediately "supposed" to "put the other in a bad light" and "supposed" to deflect from the point, and "put" the other on a course of "defending" themselves.

"I", absolutely believe all Scripture is true...
But absolutely, "I cherry-pick".
"I" absolutely "ONLY" apply To myself, that which applies To "me".

You said, the Rapture was a new age thing.
I will agree, the word "Rapture" is a fairly new "English Language" Term, dating back to the early 1800's.

And agree with Enoch111, that the soles saved IN Christ, was taught 2,000 + years ago, will be "caught up" in the air, to meet the Lord, before the Great Tribulation.

I also believe, many who disagree with the EVENT referenced as "The Rapture", do not fully know or understand exactly ...
Who, what, when, why, where or how, "The Rapture" applies to.

Whomever believes IN the event called "The Rapture...should know the who, what, when, why, where and how...
As well, one who does not believe in the event called "The Rapture", should know WHY he does not believe in such an event.

Glory to God,
Taken
What I am saying is that the position of people like Tim la hey ? ect is pathetic on the so called rapture, this is new age nonsense to me, I would go look at the RCC what is in depth position on the subject and not a load of dribble made up that's worthy of Homer Simpson cartoon.
I never heard the word peddled as The rapture until maybe late 1990's in the USA it may of been earlier for them but not here in Australia that I knew off.
Now I asked people in the church that I knew back in the 60's to 80's and said about the rapture that such a wording was not ever mentioned in church ever, this crept in and then it became number one topic in the church over time, the change in all the Christian denominations is astounding, I find it all a joke. the amount of so called Priest that know bugger all is amazing, my father in law is always telling me what an idiot their Priest are, it's one idiot followed by another idiot, he has a dig at them all the time and half the time they just don't get it. he is being nice tho. he says listen to this, to me and then questioning the Priest in front of me, then after he says to me, see what a dill ! and he is like 90yo and he can remember back clearly what was taught and the change to what they are peddling nowadays.

You look at what Pope Frances has been saying :rolleyes::confused::eek::oops:o_O what a complete total fool ! what a straight out Satanist ! if anyone had studied all of what Pope Ben had said before he became Pope and then look at what Pope Francis says, you could not get anything more different.
It's all about catering for all the fools and trying to be seen as popular and never to offend anyone regardless, that is the first commandment and the second is thou must not be a racist. that's the key to the modern bible. Politically Correct version under Pope Cultural Marxist Socialist Communist the 3rd:p. the new bible for Slavery under Lies and cunning distortions.
 

Taken

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Encounter Team
Feb 6, 2018
24,573
12,984
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What I am saying is that the position of people like Tim la hey ? ect is pathetic on the so called rapture, this is new age nonsense to me, I would go look at the RCC what is in depth position on the subject and not a load of dribble made up that's worthy of Homer Simpson cartoon.
I never heard the word peddled as The rapture until maybe late 1990's in the USA it may of been earlier for them but not here in Australia that I knew off.
Now I asked people in the church that I knew back in the 60's to 80's and said about the rapture that such a wording was not ever mentioned in church ever, this crept in and then it became number one topic in the church over time, the change in all the Christian denominations is astounding, I find it all a joke. the amount of so called Priest that know bugger all is amazing, my father in law is always telling me what an idiot their Priest are, it's one idiot followed by another idiot, he has a dig at them all the time and half the time they just don't get it. he is being nice tho. he says listen to this, to me and then questioning the Priest in front of me, then after he says to me, see what a dill ! and he is like 90yo and he can remember back clearly what was taught and the change to what they are peddling nowadays.

You look at what Pope Frances has been saying :rolleyes::confused::eek::oops:o_O what a complete total fool ! what a straight out Satanist ! if anyone had studied all of what Pope Ben had said before he became Pope and then look at what Pope Francis says, you could not get anything more different.
It's all about catering for all the fools and trying to be seen as popular and never to offend anyone regardless, that is the first commandment and the second is thou must not be a racist. that's the key to the modern bible. Politically Correct version under Pope Cultural Marxist Socialist Communist the 3rd:p. the new bible for Slavery under Lies and cunning distortions.

I can not speak to what Catholics in Australia do, Nor would I say to go ask a Priest anything. I am not Catholic, nor believe many things they teach.
Nor would I continue to go and listen, if I Scripturally verified and found what the Preacher/Priest was preaching was not valid.

What Bible Version do you use If I may ask?

Glory to God,
Taken
 

Reggie Belafonte

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2018
5,871
2,919
113
63
Brisbane
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I can not speak to what Catholics in Australia do, Nor would I say to go ask a Priest anything. I am not Catholic, nor believe many things they teach.
Nor would I continue to go and listen, if I Scripturally verified and found what the Preacher/Priest was preaching was not valid.

What Bible Version do you use If I may ask?

Glory to God,
Taken
Authorised King James version with the words of Jesus in Red.

Catholic action edition 1961 and an older one that was what I studied with originally, I would not bother with the newer Catholic Bibles as they are hopeless backward rubbish. so I was lucky that I found a 1961 in like new condition. such gives very good information and foot notes and as to the real Catholic position, not like the total pathetic junk that the RCC is peddling nowadays.

I have other Bibles as well but, the two above are in a class above all the rest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taken

Copperhead

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2017
835
304
63
67
iowa
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"Cherry-picking" is one of those terms, like, "hate, bigot, discriminate, anti, racist...etc." that is immediately "supposed" to "put the other in a bad light" and "supposed" to deflect from the point, and "put" the other on a course of "defending" themselves.

that's for sure. But seems to be the normal course of dialogue in this day.
 

Copperhead

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2017
835
304
63
67
iowa
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Authorised King James version with the words of Jesus in Red.

Yeah, authorized by the Church of England. Many reformers did not accept that "authorization". I always get a kick out it when I here the "authorized" comment. No one seems to ask who it is authorized by. It is a great translation, but not an infallible one.
 

bbyrd009

Groper
Nov 30, 2016
33,943
12,081
113
Ute City, COLO
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States Minor Outlying Islands
This thread will be strictly limited in scope to minutely dissecting what every verse and word in the relevant passages refers to specifically, and I will police this thread to make sure it stays that way.
narf, how's that working out for ya, cant wait to look there lol
dunno why i missed your tag to me there, hmm
 

bbyrd009

Groper
Nov 30, 2016
33,943
12,081
113
Ute City, COLO
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Good God let's hope so! God is spirit, and if we are not for Him and have a desire to become One with Him, we are against Him.
But you are under the wrong impression. The rapture, in other words the resurrection...is the first "literal" experience of mankind! That is, it is man's moment of re-birth, being born of the spirit of God and into His literal and spiritual presence.

All the world and "creation"...was rather just an "image" of man's gestation. Do you not know that the world, like the womb is a hollow place of exile?
what he said, although i suggest that there is a crucial diff in erets and kosmou
 

bbyrd009

Groper
Nov 30, 2016
33,943
12,081
113
Ute City, COLO
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States Minor Outlying Islands
This really takes the cake! If you had planned to thoroughly confuse your readers, you succeeded admirably.
what does the Preacher say as you are going down into and comin up out of the water, pEnoch

ok dont think i'm interested in the rest, hope you aint readin Paul to your destruction ok
 

Hidden In Him

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2018
10,600
10,883
113
59
Lafayette, LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
narf, how's that working out for ya, cant wait to look there lol
dunno why i missed your tag to me there, hmm

I lost all hope...
like within two pages or something, LoL.

Dave L kinda screwed this thread up in a hurry, and I got to playing around with him to where I wasn't taking things seriously anymore.

demotivational-poster-lion-facepaw.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbyrd009

Hidden In Him

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2018
10,600
10,883
113
59
Lafayette, LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I lost all hope...
like within two pages or something, LoL.

Dave L kinda screwed this thread up in a hurry, and I got to playing around with him to where I wasn't taking things seriously anymore.

demotivational-poster-lion-facepaw.jpg

No, wait... it wasn't Dave L on this one. Somebody else said something that hit my funny bone, and I never recovered or something.

Who knows... another day in the life of Christianity Board, I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taken and bbyrd009