New Zealand is not the only Nation in which the investments (in infrastructure) of many generations, have been Laundered- But the laws related to NZ display quite clearly how this is easily perceived as nothing more than Organised Crime
The Crimes Act 1961 which is said to "Bind the Crown" (section 408) displays to us in part 10 Crimes against rights of property the legal definition of a crime resulting from the concealing of and/or the transferring of interests in property Section 243 Money Laundering (note the use of the term "without limitation") describes the process we have come to know as "Privatisation" almost to the letter.
http://www.legislati.../DLM327382.html
Why would any Government or responsible representative Body, commit an act which pre-existing legislation (said to Bind the Crown) defines as Criminal??? -Like, Penning into Creation, New Legislature/Instruments (corporations) in which to, conceal/transfer "OUR" interests in Properties?
BECAUSE THEY CAN?- and you can't touch "Their" trust accounts (or can you/we?)
What point then in having a "Bind upon the Crown"? and has the "Crown" therefore displayed that it cannot be Bound by the Law of Contract?
Is that not like the "Crown" lacking Legal Capacity/integrity?
In the absence of Honour- Do we actually NEED to adopt the Egyptian methodology of outing this (two party) regime "In the Hope of Adherence to Rule of Law"? [From those serving in positions of trust, (especially to so do)].
These problems could be resolved but the Criminal acts will continue until APATHY is overruled
In my opinion God has already shown his hand...... But seems to have little or no support.. my guess is that numbers count toward resolve....... .
The Crimes Act 1961 which is said to "Bind the Crown" (section 408) displays to us in part 10 Crimes against rights of property the legal definition of a crime resulting from the concealing of and/or the transferring of interests in property Section 243 Money Laundering (note the use of the term "without limitation") describes the process we have come to know as "Privatisation" almost to the letter.
http://www.legislati.../DLM327382.html
Why would any Government or responsible representative Body, commit an act which pre-existing legislation (said to Bind the Crown) defines as Criminal??? -Like, Penning into Creation, New Legislature/Instruments (corporations) in which to, conceal/transfer "OUR" interests in Properties?
BECAUSE THEY CAN?- and you can't touch "Their" trust accounts (or can you/we?)
What point then in having a "Bind upon the Crown"? and has the "Crown" therefore displayed that it cannot be Bound by the Law of Contract?
Is that not like the "Crown" lacking Legal Capacity/integrity?
In the absence of Honour- Do we actually NEED to adopt the Egyptian methodology of outing this (two party) regime "In the Hope of Adherence to Rule of Law"? [From those serving in positions of trust, (especially to so do)].
These problems could be resolved but the Criminal acts will continue until APATHY is overruled
In my opinion God has already shown his hand...... But seems to have little or no support.. my guess is that numbers count toward resolve....... .
