The Man Of Sin Of Ii Thessalonians 2: 3

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

tulsa2010

New Member
Dec 13, 2010
7
1
1
92
Rolla, Missouri
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Man of Sin of II Thessalonians 2: 3

The topic of Revelation 12 and the woman fleeing into the wilderness, as brought up here by veteran, is interesting. I haven't studied this chapter in detail so far, but I understand the significance
of the woman being given the wings of a great eagle to fly into the wilderness. The woman has left the Church and its false doctrines. The woman is outside the Churches in the wilderness where she metaphorically gives birth to the man-child. What is that? Some groups have read about this man-child and said, "Thats Us." The Man-Child is not the entire Church. Its a smaller group not in false doctrines. The Serpent in Revelation 12: 15 is especially interested in going after the woman and the man-child to destroy them. He would not be as interested in going after those in false doctrines. But the woman and the man-child are given protection from Satan, and it says in verse 16 that the earth helped the woman and swallowed up the flood sent out by the Dragon. It may not be necessary to define exactly what that flood is that comes from the mouth of the Dragon. Its an attack on the woman and the man-child. But because they are given protection by God, Satan is not successful in destroying them and their mission. They may be too tough for Satan to get, and he may soon go after those who show signs of coming out of false doctrines. and are not quite as tough because they don't have as much of God's protection., at least not from physical harm A couple of scriptures come to mind. Luke 21: 36 says " Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.." Luke 10: 19 says " Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall by any means hurt you." Serpents and scorpions are metaphors for certain kinds of people. See Matthew 23:::33 for who the serpents are, and Ezekiel 2: 3-6 for scorpions, The reason we know the scorpions in Ezekiel 2 are metaphoric is because they are said to speak words.

But I want to focus on another Scripture and a couple of Bible threads related to it.

II Thessalonians 2: 3 says "Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;"

Paul does not tell us who the man of sin is. But the man of sin is said to be revealed when or after the falling away begins. The falling away is the falling of Christians from the truth of the gospel of Christ. The truth is in part replaced by man-made doctrines, so that the gospel is leavened.

Christ says in John 17: 12 that "While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled. " The son of perdition here is
Judas Iscariot. Perdition is Strong's number 684, "ruin or loss, physical, spiritual or eternal, damnable, destruction, die, perdition, perish, pernicious ways, waste." Revelation 17: 8, 11 say "The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is...And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition."

Judas was a servant of Satan, but he was of the twelve disciples of Christ. The beast in Revelation 17: 8 is also a Servant of Satan and will go into perdition, or eternal ruin. The beast in Revelation 17: 7 carries the woman of Revelation 17: 1-7 called the great wh*re, and mystery, Babylon the great, mother of harlots and abominations of the earth, who represents false religion, or man's religion.

It is interesting that Revelation 17: 8, 11 mentions a three step sequence the beast goes through. The beast was, and is not and yet shall come up out of the bottomless pit. He or it was and is not, and is of the seven. In Genesis 2 God finished his work of creation and rested on the Seventh Day. He sanctified the Seventh Day. Man was created on the sixth day. Remember that in Revelation 13: 18 the number of the Second Beast of Revelation 13 is 666, or the number six repeated three times. It s the number of man. Before the Cross the main kingdoms of the ancient world were the Egyptian and Assyrian kingdoms, and we add the four kingdoms of Daniel 2 - the Babylonian, Persian, Greek and Roman empires - and we get six kingdoms of man's rule.
Christ began the kingdom of God during the Roman Empire, so that the kingdom of God on earth is the seventh kingdom. Number Seven is the rule of God. But we don't want to get so far into Biblical numerology as to go where Harold Camping of Family Radio went with his Old Testament time lines and numerology he used to claim to predict the end of the world in 1994.

This three step sequence, or six, seven and eight sequence, can be applied to the beasts of Revelation 13. I am not saying that the
text says either beast once existed as the rule of man, then entered into the kingdom of God, but went on into the eighth phase which goes back to man's religion and man's rule. while mixing in part of the rule of God. But we can use the principle stated in Revelation 17: 8, 11 to look at the beasts in this way.

Following the Cross there were six main kingdoms which in some way mixed the kingdom of God with the kingdom and rule of man.
The Holy Roman Empire and the Spanish Empire were both Catholic kingdoms which mixed in a little of Christianity with man's rule. and then came some kingdoms which were at least in part Protestant nations - England, Russia, or the Soviet Empire, Nazi Germany and then the United States.

But it is the Second Beast of Revelation 13 that I want to deal with here. The Second Beast is said in Revelation 13: 11 to look like a lamb, but he speaks like a dragon. He or it is deceptive. This beast has been called the False Prophet. I know that Revelation 19: 20 says the False Prophet is said to be thrown into the lake of fire. Yet the Second Beast is still a collective, a group of those who believe they are God's people. It is those who stay in false doctrines. They that remain in a mix of man's religion with the Gospel of Christ are deceived and led by False Prophets, who can be called The False Prophet, But those who remain in man's religion also try to keep others in the same false doctrines.

The Second Beast of Revelation 13, who is dealt with from verses 11 to 18, appears as he is number eight or the six, seven eight cycle. We can say it is implied that this beast came out of a Christianity that once was in number seven, in God's rest.

In Revelation 13: 12 the Second Beast causes people, or Christians, to worship the First Beast, described in verses 1 to 10, whose deadly wound was healed. This indicates that the First Beast is some kind of a composite, because verses 1-2 describe the four beasts of Daniel 7, which are the British Empire, the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany and the United States as the diverse dreadful fourth beast. The nation whose deadly would was healed and who the Second Beast causes people to worship sounds like the nation of Israel, the Little Horn of Daniel 7: 8 and 8: 9.

This all is quite different from the end time scenario of Separation Theology, or Scofieldism, which cannot see the nation of Israel as any kind of beast, even if we admit that America is the fourth beast of Daniel 7: 7. The beast whose deadly wound was healed in 1948 uses the Fourth beast of Daniel 7: 8 to increase its power as the Little Horn.

Some who want an end time single person Anti-Christ will say that Paul's man of sin in II Thessalonians 2; 3 is the one man Anti-Christ. But the gist of what John tells us about the Anti-Christ in I John 2: 18-19 and I John 4: 2-3 is that there is not one single Anti-Christ to appear during the dispensationalist seven year tribulation, but that the spirit of Anti-Christ manifests as many Anti-Christs and we can believe that these Anti-Christs will become more threatening in the tribulation. There will be a tribulation but I am not at all sure it will last seven years.

Since Paul associated the revealing of the man of sin with the falling away in II Thessalonians 2: 3 it is more likely that the man of sin is the Second Beast of Revelation 13: 1-18,. To cause the falling away of Christians
from the truth of Christ's gospel into false doctrines is the .mission of the Second Beast of revelation 13. And that falling away has been going on since the late 19th century.

My King James Version Reference Bible lists I Timothy 4: 1, Daniel 7: 25 and Revelation 13: 5 for II Thessalonians 2: 3. I Timothy 4: 1 is the most relevant of these three, which says ". Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;"

The man of sin is not a one man Anti-Christ, but the context fits the Second Beast of Revelation 13: 11-18, the False Prophet, which again, is not one man, though the False Prophet can include the office of False Prophet (John Hagee at present?). The Second Beast is the Church in apostasy, or in the falling away from the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ. "Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son (II John 1: 9)."
 

Martin W.

Active Member
Jan 16, 2009
817
37
28
70
Winnipeg Canada
Tulsa2010
With all respect I worry about you Tulsa. You seem to have the idea that if every Christian "is not as good as you" they are the enemy. It seems to be your continual focus and clouds your thinking.

Read the first couple of chapters of 1st Corinthians . If it could be done wrong , the Corinthians were doing it. But they were still part of the church and it said they lacked no spiritual gifts.

They certainly needed correction , but they were not the enemy .

I think your focus on "less than perfect" Christians is consuming you.

We all go wrong at one time or another.

Topics such as "the woman fleeing into the wilderness" are fraught with difficulties because (at this moment anyway) we are not able to determine who exactly the "woman with the wings of a great eagle" actually is.

Your position is based on some weak assumptions. The exact thing you accuse "the weak church" of doing.

Best wishes in your studies. You have the enthusiasm , just try to get the focus correct .

Your friend , I hope.
Thanks
Martin.
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
I commend your thoroughness Tulsa on your conclusion that the "man of sin" Paul spoke of in 2 Thess.2 is not about a singular Antichrist. Yet in all references Paul was giving there, it was in the singular tense about a certain individual.

It's likewise with our Lord's warning of a pseudochristos in Matt.24:24 and Mark 13:22. Also, the details given about that beast by our Lord in Rev.17 is also pointing to a specific entity, just as the Biblical usage of the word "dragon" in Rev.12 is specifically defined as a name for the devil himself. From Matt.24:21 to 26 our Lord was pointing to a particular entity working great signs and wonders to deceive, which is also given in 2 Thess.2 abou that Wicked one, and in Rev.13:11 forward about the another beast who speaks as the dragon.

That "son of perdition", "man of sin", "that Wicked", which Paul declared is to come and sit in the Temple of God, showing himself that he is God, is about the devil himself. Satan coveting God's Throne is what the very first sin in the beginning was about. Our Lord defined that in Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 about the devil doing that back in times of old.

Our Lord Jesus called Judas "a devil" in John 6:70, which is how the "son of perdition" title was also applied to Judas for following the devil. It's important to remember that ONLY the devil and his angels are now already judged and sentenced to PERISH in the future lake of fire. That's the origin of that "son of perdition" title, a direct pointer to Satan himself, for Judas has not yet been judged to perish today.

The "man of sin" title also is about Satan, because Satan sinned from the beginning as written (1 John 3:8). He committed the very first sin against God when he rebelled, and drew a third of the angels into rebellion with him (Rev.12:3-4).

The phrase "that Wicked", with Wicked capitalized in most KJV Bibles, is another pointer directly to Satan. It is given as a proper name, like "Death" capitalized in Rev.6.

In Rev.11, we're told the beast that ascends from the bottomless pit will kill God's two witnesses in Jerusalem in the last days. That's another direct pointer to Satan, even appearing on earth by ascending from the bottomless pit in the last days.

In Rev.9, we're told the locust army have 'a' king over them, the angel of the bottomless pit, and his name is Apollyon in the Greek, which is from the same Greek word where 'perdition' comes from in other NT Scripture.

And most of all, in Rev.12:7-9 we're shown that old serpent, the devil himself, being cast out of the heavenly dimension to this earthly dimension in order to cast waters like a flood at the symbolic woman Israel, which is a link to all those other Scriptures above.

If a believer will simply focus on those Scripture examples and think for theirself, I don't see how those pointers can be missed.

Moreover, in the 1 John 2:18 verse, there is mention of both a singular "antichrist", and plural "many antichrists". To infer that verse is not about a singular antichrist goes against even the rules of simple grammar, since to have 'many apples', a singular 'apple' must first exist. The idea of "many antichrists" is the subject of the "mystery of iniquity" which Paul covered, and it's the "workers of iniquity" per OT history. It's simply about those who follow Satan. But they are not Satan himself. John And Paul were simply declaring how the many antichrists working of iniquity was already at work in this world, not that the particular antichrist John mentioned they heard was to come had actually showed up yet. The early Church fathers also understood this difference, which is why they still looked for a particular Antichrist in their days long after Apostle John had given that 1 John 2:18 verse.

Weigh this about man's doctrine of no single Antichrist. That doctrine's purpose is to deny the coming of a particular false messiah, the pseudochristos our Lord Jesus warned of in Matt.24, that Paul warned of in 2 Cor.11 about the "another Jesus", and "son of perdition" in 2 Thess.2, and our Lord through John warned of in Rev.13 doing miracles on earth in the sight of men. Now what would be the point in denying a singular Antichrist working with those great signs and wonders on earth?

It's purpose is to get our Christian brethren to not look for that singular Antichrist, which that false messiah's main purpose of coming in the last days is to present himself to the world as God, the very role which Satan covets against God and His people. Another purpose is so as to be able to mis-assign the timing of when that future false messiah is to appear on earth working great signs and miracles. If no singular Antichrist is meant, then man can go about mis-assigning anyone or anything that works against Christ to it, from OT times all to the way up to today, and once again, they won't be looking for the coming future false messiah our Lord warned His about.

Until those specific signs our Lord gave about that singular Antichrist is fulfilled, we may see many patterns for it, but those patterns or types or only for getting our attention to be prepared for the actual Antichrist for the last days. The LORD gives us many patterns or types for a coming event as a way to warn us. That's why the idea of Babylon is used again at the end of this world per Revelation. For the end of this world, the full Antichrist role is going to manifest by Satan de facto coming to this earth to fulfilll that role, the role of playing God upon the earth, a role that he has always coveted since he first rebelled. This is why our Lord gives us a hint of that by revealing a beast system of 10 horns, 7 heads, but only 7 crowns linked with Satan's original rebellion per Rev.12:3-4. In the next Rev.13 chapter, we were to pick up on that difference for the final beast system on the earth, which is to have 10 crowns instead of that old one of 7 given back at Rev.12.
 

precepts

Member
Feb 24, 2008
180
0
16
56
I can only lead a horse to water .......... The "son of perdition" (KJV) is not a normal human being but the angel from the bottomless pit. What more proof do we need than God's own words stating that Judas was the "son of perdition", not a son of perdition but the son of perdition. The point is, the Beast has been many different beings thru out history including Nebuchadnezzar and the 8th Roman horn/king/emperor.

Why the 4/5 horsemen, the 4/5 beast kingdoms, and the 4 angels, released from the Euphrates river, and the Beast? Each horseman represents a beast kindom ruler and one of the 5 fallen angels. Satan would be the 6th fallen.
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
I can only lead a horse to water .......... The "son of perdition" (KJV) is not a normal human being but the angel from the bottomless pit. What more proof do we need than God's own words stating that Judas was the "son of perdition", not a son of perdition but the son of perdition. The point is, the Beast has been many different beings thru out history including Nebuchadnezzar and the 8th Roman horn/king/emperor.

Why the 4/5 horsemen, the 4/5 beast kingdoms, and the 4 angels, released from the Euphrates river, and the Beast? Each horseman represents a beast kindom ruler and one of the 5 fallen angels. Satan would be the 6th fallen.

Judas was not the "son of perdition" of 2 Thessalonians 2, and there's an easy way to know that. The "son of perdition" Paul was speaking of in 2 Thess.2 was still yet to come in his days, and Judas was already dead! Preachers saying Paul meant Judas Iscariot really show their learning now don't they; blind leaders of the blind.

The word "beast" used in God's Word is a metaphor for Satan's host. It can apply to Satan himself also, just as Christ used that "son of perdition" title for Judas (John 17:12), because Judas followed the devil.

Christ even called Judas "a devil" in John 6:70. So WAS Judas Iscariot actually the devil? No, just as that "son of perdition" title is really a pointer to the devil himself. So just as the devil himself is the real "son of perdition", the devil also is the main "beast" also. Afterall, Satan was assigned lowly to the dust as "that old serpent".

This is why in Rev.13:11 the "another beast" is about false messiah appearing with two horns LIKE a lamb (Christ), but speaks as the dragon. Rev.12:9 told us the word "dragon" is another title for the devil himself. Funny how short some people's memories are, since that was given in the Rev.12 chapter just prior to the Rev.13 chapter.

The Daniel 4 event of king Nebuchadnezzar going literally crazy to live in the wild like an animal with the beasts (animals) is a lesson about this also. Nebuchadnezzar setup a golden image idol of himself for all to bow down in worship to at the sound of musical instruments calling to worship. And those who refused to bow to it were to be killed. That serves as a pattern for what the "another beast" entity of Rev.13:11 forward is to do in the last days on earth, setting up an "image of the beast" for the whole earth to bow in worship to. Thus Nebuchadnezzar represents a beast king as a type for the final beast king of Revelation. That final beast king will be Satan coming as the false messiah to work great signs and wonders upon the earth during the coming tribulation.
 

precepts

Member
Feb 24, 2008
180
0
16
56
vet's
Judas was not the "son of perdition" of 2 Thessalonians 2, and there's an easy way to know that. The "son of perdition" Paul was speaking of in 2 Thess.2 was still yet to come in his days, and Judas was already dead! Preachers saying Paul meant Judas Iscariot really show their learning now don't they; blind leaders of the blind.
Try reading comprehension!


vet's
The word "beast" used in God's Word is a metaphor for Satan's host.
vet 2:4


vet's
It can apply to Satan himself also,
You're inventing your own doctrine and then accusing others of misleading? There is no plece in the bible to establish this as truth. Instead the "dragon", as described in Revelation, consist of the "Beast" and the 4 Euphrates angels.


vet's
just as Christ used that "son of perdition" title for Judas (John 17:12), because Judas followed the devil.
I'm not going to keep going around this mayberry bush with you on this one. Judas is called "the" son of perdition, not "a" son of perdition. There's a big difference in the reading comprehension since you want to get personal.

vet's
Christ even called Judas "a devil" in John 6:70. So WAS Judas Iscariot actually the devil?
A small "d" makes a whole lot of difference when it comes to reading Comprehension.


vet's
No, just as that "son of perdition" title is really a pointer to the devil himself.
Imagine, you're the 1st person in my 43 yrs existance to interpret the "Devil" as the Beast. Maybe you should apply for the pulitzer prize.

vet's
So just as the devil himself is the real "son of perdition", the devil also is the main "beast" also. Afterall, Satan was assigned lowly to the dust as "that old serpent".
vet 23:23


vet's
This is why in Rev.13:11 the "another beast" is about false messiah appearing with two horns LIKE a lamb (Christ), but speaks as the dragon. Rev.12:9 told us the word "dragon" is another title for the devil himself. Funny how short some people's memories are, since that was given in the Rev.12 chapter just prior to the Rev.13 chapter.

The Daniel 4 event of king Nebuchadnezzar going literally crazy to live in the wild like an animal with the beasts (animals) is a lesson about this also. Nebuchadnezzar setup a golden image idol of himself for all to bow down in worship to at the sound of musical instruments calling to worship. And those who refused to bow to it were to be killed. That serves as a pattern for what the "another beast" entity of Rev.13:11 forward is to do in the last days on earth, setting up an "image of the beast" for the whole earth to bow in worship to. Thus Nebuchadnezzar represents a beast king as a type for the final beast king of Revelation. That final beast king will be Satan coming as the false messiah to work great signs and wonders upon the earth during the coming tribulation.
Pulitzer prize winning information, vet! Lead the flock! :lol:
 

Martin W.

Active Member
Jan 16, 2009
817
37
28
70
Winnipeg Canada
The woman has left the Church and its false doctrines. The woman is outside the Churches in the wilderness where she metaphorically gives birth to the man-child. What is that? Some groups have read about this man-child and said, "Thats Us." The Man-Child is not the entire Church. Its a smaller group not in false doctrines.

QUESTION : Why is it that folks who are pretending to be bible scholars have to always come along and inject strange personal opinions like quoted above ?

ANSWER : Because it serves their internal righteous pride as they convince themselves they are not part of the large and imperfect church.

When a person creates false doctrine to convince themselves they do not follow false doctrine it is done to satisfy internal religious pride.

Which of course some people find addicting.



Martin W.
Member of the large and imperfect church
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
Maybe some here need a little lesson on the timing Apostle Paul was talking about in 2 Thess.2, and of what entity?

2 Thess 2:1-4
1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

Paul's subject? The second coming of Jesus Christ, and our gathering to Him. That's "day of Christ" phrase is actually 'day of The Lord' in the Greek (with kurios instead of Christos). That shows Paul was speaking of a time future, and since Christ's return and the day of The LORD has not happenned yet even today, we know that day is yet future to us still. All that is simple English grammar in those two verses that set the time stage of this prophecy through Paul for the future.


3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

To infer Paul was speaking about Judas Iscariot there would mean what for the prophecy time Paul just set in the previous verses? Judas was already dead when Paul said this, so how could Judas be this "son of perdition" he was speaking of? We cannot simply try to change the timing Paul gave in the first two verses to make this "son of perdition" fit Judas Iscariot who was already dead and gone.

Once again, what timing did Paul start this about within those first two verses? Christ's second coming and our gathering to Him and the day of The LORD events. That's still future to us today (unless you can prove to me that Christ Jesus has already gathered us to Himself to Jerusalem and ended the reign of the wicked off this earth already. No, I didn't think you could prove that).

Paul then declares that day of Christ won't come "except" a great falling away happens first, and that "son of perdition" is revealed. If Judas was who he was speaking of, then did the day of The LORD already happen back in Judas' day? No, not yet, because there's a lot of prophecy about Christ's return and the day of The LORD events that have NEVER yet been fulfilled, to our present days even (but I feel it will be soon).

What else did Paul give us in order to recognize that son of perdition he was speaking of?


4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
(KJV)


Did Judas do any of this? No. Did Judas Iscariot come and sit in the temple of God to show himself that he was God? No. Did Judas exalt himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped? No. Instead Judas held the money bag, and sought his own aims, fulfilling the prophecy of the pieces of silver in betraying our Lord Jesus to Satan's servants.


Thus holding to the false tradition that Paul was speaking about Judas Iscariot in that 2 Thessalonians 2 Scripture is a major show of ignorance, and of following a tradition that some false prophet devised to deceive with a long time ago. It is a ludicrous doctrine that leaves all common sense, and is very easy to refute just by staying focused on what Apostle Paul was pointing to there of a future timing.